PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Punjab State Board PSEB 11th Class Political Science Book Solutions Chapter 8 Justice Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 11 Political Science Chapter 8 Justice

Long Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Define the term ‘Justice’. Discuss the fundamental postulates of Justice.
Answer:
‘Justice’ is of utmost importance in Political Science. Its existence is as ancient as human society. Several scholars have defined justice differently in every age.
Meaning and definitions of Justice. The word ‘Justice’ has been derived from Latin word ‘ Jus’ which means, Bond or Tie. It means, Justice is that system where in all individuals are related to each other. In modern Political Science, Justice stands for that state of social life in which personal rights are combined with social welfare. Main definitions of justice are mentioned below :
1. To quote J.S. Mill, “Justice is the name for certain classes of moral values, which concern the essentials of human well-being more clearly and are, therefore, of more absolute obligations, than any other rules for the guidance of life.

2. According to Barker, “Justice is an order of persons and an order of the principles regulating the distribution of rights to persons, which is measured and determined by a final and ultimate value.”

3. According to Salmond, “Justice means to give every individual his due share.”

4. Merriam opines, “Justice consists in a system of understandings and procedures through which is accorded what is agreed upon as fair.”

Merriam’s definition highlights the following four aspects:

  • Justice is concerned with moral values and conceptions of society.
  • Justice is related to procedures also. Law and Courts are set to get justice.
  • The aim of Justice is to arrange rights and conveniences for people.
  • Different classes of society at a time can have different conceptions of rights and conveniences.

On the basis of above-mentioned definitions, we can conclude that Justice is that state in which a man can lead a well-set and disciplined life.

Fundamental Postulates Of Justice:
Arnold Brecht has described the following Fundamental Postulates of Justice-

1. Truth: Truth is the basic postulate of justice. Truth means exact presentation of an incident. Truthfulness of the facts stated in courts is of primary importance.

2. Generality of the Systems of Value: It means that the same conception of justice should be applied to every matter.

3. Equality before Law: All the citizens should be equal before law. The citizens should not be discriminated in the name of caste, colour, creed and sex.

4. Freedom: Justice and freedom are co-related. The Liberals are of the view that man can get justice only in a free atmosphere. Freedom should be restricted for the welfare of society and nation.

5. Respect for the Essentials of Nature: It is against the spirit of justice to compel a man to do some work which is beyond his capacity naturally. For example, to expect an old and ill man to put in physical labour is purely injustice.

These above-mentioned five fundamental postulates are necessary to be followed to get justice at the local, national and international level.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Question 2.
What are the socio-economic dimensions of Justice ? Explain fully.
Or
What do you understand by the phrase, ‘Justice, Social and Economic’? Indicate five of its major implications.
Answer:
Two forms of Justice- Moral and Legal were prevalent traditionally. But these days Justice has various aspects – legal, political, social and economic. The importance of social and economic justice is increasing day-by-day and both are inter-connected. Social and economic justice is the very basis of present welfare states.

Social Justice:
Social justice is extremely popular in modem age. Innumerable people, all over the world, have adopted Socialism and Marxism only because of social justice. Once Pandit Nehru expressed his view that Marxism is extremely popular not because of its scientific principle but for its readiness for social justice.

According to Gajendra Gadker, “ Social Justice means the abolition of all social inequalities and provision of equal opportunities to all the individuals living in society.” Allen says, “ Social justice means removal of inequalities and discrimination amongst the members of the society.” Thus social justice means that all the people living in society are equal. The people should not be treated discriminately on the basis of caste, religion, colour and sex.

All the people should have equal opportunities to develop their personalities, all should have equal facilities to use public places, religious places and the places of entertainment. The State shouldn’t adopt the policy of untouchability and the interests of the minorities should be. safeguarded.

According to Barker, it is the main objective of society to give opportunity to each individual to develop his inborn talent. So establishment of adequate conditions for all is Social Justice.
Laski is of the view that to provide equal social rights is social justice. Establishment of social justice is the responsibility of the State. Social justice has been strongly emphasised in Indian Constitution and the Government of India has passed general laws to establish Social Justice.

Economic Justice:
Social justice and Economic Justice are intimately related to each other. Aristotle considered economic inequality to be improper. Kautilya suggested that the State would provide means to live to the orphans, helpless and the disabled. The State would organise economic system in such a way as to provide justice to its citizens.

Karl Marx, the expounder of Communism, called Economic Justice to be the basis of social, political and cultural justice. Now-a-days social justice without economic justice is thought to be sheer imagination. M.C. Chagla has rightly commented, freedom is meaningless if it obstructs the realization of economic justice. Social justice has no value for a hungry and unemployed person.

According to Setalvad, “Economic justice is the provision of equal opportunities to the citizens to acquire wealth and use it for their living, it is applied to those persons who are disabled or old or unemployed and therefore not in a position to acquire wealth and should be helped by society to live.”

Important elements of economic justice are mentioned below:

  • The bare necessities of all the citizens should be provided with.
  • Every individual should be given the sources of livelihood. Adequate wages for their work should be given.
  • Under special circumstances citizens have the right to get government aid. The State should protect the old, unemployed and economically infirm.
  • Men and women should get equal wages for equal work.
  • The scholars differ in their views about the control over property and sources of production.

It is the State’s responsibility to establish economic justice. The State aims at eliminating economic inequality. Economic justice is the very foundation of modem state. A just society can’t he established without economic justice. The Government of India is trying its best to maintain economic justice.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Explain the term Justice.
Answer:
The word ‘Justice’ has been derived from Latin word ‘Jus’ which means, Bond or Tie. It means, Justice is that system where in all individuals are related to each other. Justice is connected with the fact as to what type of moral, social, economic, political and legal relations an individual has with the other individual. In Modern Political Science, Justice stands for that state of social life in which personal rights are combined with social welfare.

  1. According to Salmond, “Justice means to give every individual his due share.”
  2. Merriam opines, “Justice consists in a system of understanding and procedures through which is accorded what is agreed upon as fair.”

Question 2.
Distinguish between legal and moral justice.
Answer:
The difference between legal justice and moral justice is as follows:
1. Legal justice deals with Principles and procedures as laid down by the system of law prevailing in a state whereas moral justice deals with what is right and what is Wrong. What are our rights and what are our duties as human beings.

2. The coercion power of state works behind legal justice whereas the strength of morality is behind moral justice.

3. The scope of legal justice is limited than moral justice.

4. Legal codes are defined and fixed but this is not so with moral justice.

Question 3.
Discuss the meaning and importance of Social Justice.
Answer:
Meaning of Social Justice:
Social Justice means that all the people living in a society are equal. Social Justice implies that there should not be any discrimination among citizens from social point of view. No discrimination should be made on the basis of religion, caste, colour, sex, etc. All the people should have equal opportunities to develop their personalities.

Importance of Social Justice:
The importance of social justice is increasing day-by-day in a modern democratic state. Social justice is the very basis of present Welfare state. Once Pandit Nehru expressed his view that Marxism is extremely popular not because of its scientific principles but for its readiness for social justice. Social justice is very essential for the maintenance of social harmony and peace in the society. To make democracy a success, social justice is essential.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Question 4.
What do you mean by Social Justice? Do you agree that majority of the people are denied social justice in India?
Answer:
Meaning of Social Justice:
Social Justice means that all the people living in a society are equal. Social Justice implies that there should not be any discrimination among citizens from social point of view. No discrimination should be made on the basis of religion, caste, colour, sex, etc. All the people should have equal opportunities to develop their personalities.

Majority of the People are denied Social Justice in India:
Though the makers of the Indian constitution have made a provision for social justice through Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy, yet majority of the people are being denied social justice in India. The citizens enjoy right to equality which is the very basis of the social justice, but in practice economic equality does not exist which is the pre-condition for social and political equality.

Though Article-17 had abolished untouchability yet in practice untouchability is followed in many parts of the country. Poor people are not getting social justice and more than thirty per cent of the people are living below poverty line. Children, women and weaker sections of the society are still exploited and they do not enjoy social justice.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Very Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Discuss the term Justice.
Answer:
The word ‘Justice’ has been derived from Latin word ‘Jus’ which means, Bond or Tie. It means, Justice is that system where in all individuals are related to each other. In Modem Political Science, Justice stands for that state of social life in which personal rights are combined with social welfare.

Question 2.
Define Justice.
Answer:

  1. According to Salmond, “Justice means to give every individual his due share.”
  2. Merriam opines, “Justice consists in a system of understanding and procedures through which is accorded what is agreed upon as fair.”

Question 3.
Discuss the meaning of Social Justice.
Answer:
Social Justice means that all the people living in a society are equal. Social Justice implies that there should not be any discrimination among citizens from social point of view. No discrimination should be made on the basis of religion, caste, colour, sex, etc. All the people should have equal opportunities to develop their personalities.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

One Word to One Sentence Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
From which language has the word ‘Justice’ been derived?
Answer:
The English word ‘Justice’ has been derived from the Latin word ‘Jus’.

Question 2.
Write down the meaning of Justice.
Answer:
The Enghsh word Justice means a Bond or tie.

Question 3.
Give a definition of Justice.
Answer:
According to D.D. Raphael,“Justice protects the rights of the individual as well as the order of society.”

Question 4.
Write down the definition of Justice given by Salmond.
Answer:
According to Salmond,“Justice means to provide everybody his share.”

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Question 5.
Mention two basic postulates of Justice.
Answer:

  1. Truth
  2. Liberty.

Question 6.
Mention any two dimensions or forms of Justice.
Answer:

  1. Legal Dimension of Justice.
  2. Social Dimension of Justice.

Question 7.
What is the meaning of Political Justice?
Answer:
Political Justice means that every individual, without any discrimination, should have the right to participate in the governance of the state.

Question 8.
Write down any two means to get political justice.
Answer:

  1. Democratic System
  2. Political Rights.

Question 9.
What is meant by Social Justice?
Answer:
Social Justice means that all individuals living in a society are equal and there should be no discrimination in their mutual relations.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Question 10.
What is the meaning of Economic Justice?
Answer:
There should be a proper division of the material means of the country. They should be used for the benefit of more and more people. They should serve the interest of maximum people.

Question 11.
What is Legal Justice?
Answer:
Legal Justice is concerned with the principle and process established by law in a state.

Fill in the blanks

1. Justice is that state in which a ……………… can lead a well-set and disciplined life.
Answer:
Man

2. The word justice has been derived from ……………… word.
Answer:
Latin

3. According to ……………… “justice means to give every individual his due share.”
Answer:
Salmond

4. Truth is the basic postulate of ……………… .
Answer:
Justice

5. All citizens should equal before ……………… .
Answer:
Law.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

True or False statement

1. Justice and freedom are co-related.
Answer:
True

2. Social justice is extremely popular in modem age.
Answer:
True

3. Social justice -and Economic justice are not related to each other.
Answer:
False.

4. Men and women should get equal wages for equal work.
Answer:
True

5. It is not the state responsbility to establish economic justice.
Answer:
False.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Choose The Correct Answer

Question 1.
Justice require:
(A) Committed judiciary
(B) Fearful judges
(C) Independent judiciary
(D) Dishonest judges.
Answer:
(C) Independent judiciary

Question 2.
People get proper justice in:
(A) Dictatorship
(B) Totalitarian state
(C) Monarchy
(D) Democracy.
Answer:
(D) Democracy.

Question 3.
Which one of the following Is not the fundamental postulate of justice:
(A) Truth
(B) Equality before law
(C) Freedom
(D) Property.
Answer:
(D) Property.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 8 Justice

Question 4.
Justice la administered by:
(A) Executive
(B) Judiciary
(C) Legislature
(D) Political Parties
Answer:
(B) Judiciary

Question 5.
Justice Is essentially a:
(A) Legäl concept
(B) Moral concept
(C) Socia) concept
(D) All of the Above.
Answer:
(D) All of the Above.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Punjab State Board PSEB 11th Class Political Science Book Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 11 Political Science Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Long Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Equality? Discuss its important kinds.
Answer:
Like liberty equality also has its importance for the individual. Both liberty and equality are very closely related to each other. There can be no liberty in the absence of equality. From the very beginning the individuals have tried to attain the right to equality. In ancient times the system of slavery was considered natural and it is quite clear from this thing that the individuals were not considered equal and they were not entitled to all the rights.

There were many struggles for the attainment of the right to equality. In the American Declaration of Independence (1776) it was declared that all the individuals are equal. In the French Declaration of Rights it was said that “Men are born and, always continue, free and equal in respect of their rights.” In the 19th and 20th centuries almost all the States recognized the right to equality. Russian constitution declared all individuals as equal and gave equal rights to all the citizens. In India also the right to equality is an important part of fundamental rights.

Meaning Of Equality:
Equality does not mean that all persons may be treated equal in all respects. Nor does equality imply that all persons should be given identical treatment irrespective of their capacity and temperament. Equality also does not mean ‘the identity of reward’ for efforts that are undesirable. The popular meaning of equality is that all men are equal, that all should get equal incomes and equal treatment. But this is a misconception of the principle of equality.

All men are never equal. Nature has endowed different men with different capacities. One individual is bom with the genius of the poet, another with that of the musician, a third with that of an engineer. The vast majority do not possess special aptitude of any kind. Men are not bom equal. In the words of Elton Trueblood, “Physically some men are three or four times as strong as others, able to perform many times as much work.

Intellectually the contrast is still greater, as may be realised when we compare an average person with a man like Sir Winston Churchill If intellectual in equality is more marked than physical inequality, moral inequality is still more so. The contrast between self-centred and cruel persons on the one hand, and the saints and heroes on the other, is really incalculable.”

All that is necessary to ensure the principle of equality is that special privileges of all kinds should be abolished. The State should grant equal civil and political rights to all people, making no discrimination on the ground of race, colour or income. All persons should be regarded as equal before the eyes of law.

Like liberty, equality has also a positive connotation. Not only all special privileges should be abolished, but all men should be given adequate opportunities to develop their abilities. This does not mean that all should get equal opportunities or that the State should make equal arrangements for everybody. All that is necessary to ensure equality is that the State should provide suitable opportunities for everybody.

If a citizen feels that he has the making of a good doctor in him, nothing stands in the way of his joining a good medical institution. He should be enabled to develop his abilities with the help of the State. The principle of equality is satisfied when the State provides its citizens with adequate opportunities for developing their abilities.

Thus there should be adequate and suitable facilities in the State for everyone to develop his own genius. The State should pass such laws that everyone in the State should be given full chances of development. The State should actively promote the welfare of all citizens.

Definitions of Equality:

  1. According to Laski, “Whatever rights inhere in another by virtue of his being a citizen must inhere and to the same extent in me also.”
  2. According to Barker, “The principle of equality accordingly means that whatever conditions are guaranteed to me in the form of rights shall also and in the same measure be guaranteed to others and that whatever rights are given to others shall also be given to me.”
  3. According to Laski, “Equality means, first of all the absence of special privileges and in the second place it means that adequate opportunities are laid upon to all.”

Characteristics of Equality:
On the basis of the above-mentioned facts we come to know about the following features of equality:
1. Absence of Special Privileges:
An important feature of equality is that no individual or section of people is given special privileges in society. Nobody is given special privileges on the basis of caste, colour, creed, religion and blood. All the members of the State and society should get equal opportunities on equal basis. The principle of equality cannot enjoy special privileges.

2. Provision for Adequate Opportunities of Development:
Equality means that every man in the State should get adequate opportunities for realizing his best self. Nature has not made all men equal. But it is not proper for the State to follow the law of Nature. On the other hand, the State through its laws should not increase this natural inequality. Rather it should pass such laws that no one in the State should be denied the opportunity of developing his own genius.

No one can be deprived of the opportunity to make progress on the basis of caste colour, creed and religion. The right to vote and the right to be elected should be given to all equally so that everybody gets the chance to participate in the administration, merit should be the main criterion to enter government service. Evferybody should be governed by the same law of the land and all should be equal in the eyes of law.

3. Provision for Minimum Standard of Living for every Individual:
Another important feature of equality is that all the basic needs of every individual should be satisfied in the society. The things without which life is meaningless must be accessible to all. “The urgent claims of all must be met before we can meet the particular claims of some.”

All the individuals in society cannot have the same amount of income. Every individual earns money according to his capacity and ability but everyone should have reasonable income so that he can make his both ends meet. Nobody should die of starvation. There should not exist gross inequalities of wealth among the members of society.

Kinds Of Equality:
Equality can be classified under the following heads:

  • Natural Equality.
  • Social Equality.
  • Civil Equality.
  • Economic Equality.
  • Political Equality.
  • National Equality.

1. Natural Equality:
Natural Equality has been explained differently by different writers. Some thinkers hold the opinion that Nature has created all the people equal and all persons should be given identical treatment irrespective of then- capacity and temperament. But the fact is that the Nature has not created all people equal.

People differ in colour, health, temperament and ability. Nature has not willed that all men should be equal. On the other hand, they are endowed with unequal abilities from their very birth. Natural equality may mean that all the individuals are basically equal and they should be treated equally. No individual can be sacrificed at the cost of the development of personality of another individual.

2. Social Equality:
Social equality implies that no distinction is made in the social status of the people on the ground of their riches, race, colour, religion, sex, class or caste. It implies that all members of the society are equal and no man is recognised as socially superior or inferior to other member of the community.

It also means that all persons should be treated as equal regardless of wealth, colour, caste and creed. If the society is divided into different castes or classes, that shows absence of social equality<197>that an untouchable should hold the same status in society as a Brahmin and a lord should not be considered superior to an ordinary citizen. But unfortunately that is not so in any State of the world except perhaps in Russia and that to a very limited extent. It will be nice if the sense of social inequality is uprooted and men are considered socially equal.

3. Civil Equality:
Civil equality means that everyone in the State enjoys the same status in the sphere of private law. It also sometimes implies the rule of law: It means that no person in the State should enjoy any special privileges. Fair justice is not possible in the absence of civil equality. This means that civil rights and liberties are enjoyed equally by all citizens irrespective of creed, colour and caste.

4. Economic Equality:
The aim of economic equality is to make all individuals equal in respect of wealth and income. This is the socialist idea.

Laski defines economic equality in a limited sense as consisting in equal opportunities for everyone to develop his natural faculties and power. Bryce considers that economic equality should not be an idea of democracy which is only a form of Government and should not disturb the foundations of social and economic order.

Nevertheless it should be the aim of democracy to reduce great inequalities in wealth. The concentration of property in the hands of a few is fatal to the purposes of the State and the socialist is right in his insistence that either the State must dominate property or property will dominate the State.

A very poor or starving man, having no economic opportunities has absolutely no use for the concept of equality. Therefore, economic equality has to be. given an important place in a State. Economic equality can exist, when all people have reasonable economic opportunities to develop themselves. Adequate scope for employment, reasonable wages, adequate leisure and other economic rights create economic equality.

5. Political Equality:
Political equality means that all the citizens should be treated equally in political sphere. According to Laski, by political equality is meant equal access of everyone to the avenue of authority. All the citizens should get equal political rights.

Every citizen should get the right to vote, right to contest elections, right to get Government job, right to criticise the Government and the right to address petitions and nobody should be discriminated against on the basis of caste, colour, creed, religion and blood. Certain qualifications can be laid down for getting the right to vote but these conditions should not be laid down on the basis of caste, colour, creed and religion.

6. National Equality:
National equality means that all nations of the world are equal while dealing with other nations of the world.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 2.
Discuss the relationship between Equality and Liberty.
Or
‘Liberty is meaningless without equality.’ Do you agree with this view? Give reasons for your answer.
Or
‘The passion for equality has made vain the hope of liberty.’ Do you agree with this view?
Or
Are Liberty and Equality opposed to each other? Discuss.
Or
Why do you think equality is a pre-condition of enjoying liberty in a democratic set-up? Comment.
Answer:
Both Liberty and Equality are the two basic principles of democracy. Since time immemorial people have struggled hard to attain them. Human life cannot develop fully without the attainment of liberty and equality. Now-a-days almost in all the States the citizens enjoy the right to liberty and equality.

Relation between Liberty and Equality:
Political thinkers differ among themselves on the exact relationship between liberty and equality. Some thinkers are of the opinion that the concept of equality is only a Utopia and not a reality. They say that both liberty and equality are opposed to each other and they are complementary terms. Both liberty and equality cannot go together. There are thinkers also who say that liberty and equality are closely related to each other and one cannot exist without the other. Liberty in the absence of equality is meaningless.

Liberty and Equality are opposed to each other:
There is a viewpoint that both liberty and equality are opposed to each other and they cannot go side by side. The main advocates of this viewpoint are De Tocqueville and Lord Acton. According to Lord Acton, “The passion for equality has made vain the hope for liberty.”

Equality curtails individual liberty. If everybody is considered equal in the eyes of law and equality is established in economic sphere then everybody’s liberty will be curtailed. Nobody will have the liberty to earn money according to his own sweet will. If equality is established then the intelligent and hard-working people will riot be able to develop their personality to the full. These thinkers say that liberty and equality are opposed to each other on the following grounds.

1. Natural Inequality:
People are of the opinion that Nature has not created all the people equal. Nature has created all the people unequal and all of them do not possess the same qualities. From their very birth some people are intelligent, some are fools, some are weak some are strong, some are active and others are lazy. Therefore, all these people cannot be considered equal. If all these people are treated equally, it will be unjust and irrational.

2. One Destroys the Other:
On the basis of the principles of individualism some people consider that both these concepts are opposed to each other. The individualists say that the individual should be left alone in the economic sphere and there should be free trade and competition. This will greatly help in the development of individual personality and the individual will live in a free atmosphere.

If the State establishes economic equalty then intelligent and hard-working people will not be able to make the best use of ability and capacity. If the individuals are left to themselves every individual will earn money according to themselves every individual will earn money according to his ability and capacity. It will result in gross inequalties of wealth and hence the end of equality. If the Government controls production and fixes the wages of the labourers* it will also result in the curtailment of liberty and the difference between the capable and incapable will come to an end.

3. Checks the Progress:
It is great injustice to treat the capable and incapable, the intelligent and the fool equally. This neither enhances the liberty of the people, nor it helps in the promotion of public welfare. The labourers, doctors, engineers, scholars, scientists, traders and artists, all cannot be treated on equal footing. This way equality is such a concept which is far away from reality.

Liberty and Equality are not opposed to each other. Most of the thinkers do not accept the viewpoint that liberty and equality are opposed to each other. In the modern age nobody would like to accept this viewpoint. Now-a-days the viewpoint that liberty and equality are closely related to each other is accepted at all hands. It is said that liberty in the absence of equality is meaningless.

Prof. Laski, Prof, Towny, Pollard and Maclver are the thinkers who support this viewpoint. According to Prof. Towny, “A large measure of equality, so far from being inimical to liberty is essential to it.” According to Pollard, “There is only one solution of problem of liberty. It lies in equality.”

Those who think that liberty and equality are opposed to each other misunderstand the meaning of these words. If liberty means unrestricted and unrestrained liberty and equality means equal wages and equal work then these people are right. But liberty does not mean unrestricted and absolute liberty. Nobody can be allowed to do things arbitrarily while living in society. Certain restrictions will certainly be imposed on the actions of every individual.

These restrictions should, of course, be reasonable, just and logical. The imposition of reasonable and moral restrictions instead of unjust and immoral restrictions on the actions of man is called liberty. The aim of liberty is to create comfortable atmos¬phere which can be conducive to the development of individual personality.

The people also misunderstand the meaning of equality. Equality does not mean that all the people are bom equal and all are entitled to get equal wages and equal work. This is not the real meaning of equality. All the people are not bom equal and, therefore, they are not entitled to get equal income and equal work.

Equality means that nobody should enjoy special privileges in the State and everybody should be entitled to get equal opportunities in life. Equality means reasonable distribution of wealth and not equal distribution of wealth among the members of the society.

Thus equality instead of being opposed to liberty is an essential condition of it. It is only when equal opportunities are provided to all that a man can be really free to develop his personality and powers according to his choice. In a society where social privileges and differences in income are the rule, there can be hardly any liberty for those placed in a position of inferiority.

Thus properly understood the two terms are not opposed to each other but rather complementary to each other. Laski rightly says, “De Tocquevile and Lord Acton misunderstood the meaning of the term equality They wrongly thought that equality means the identity of treatment of all or identity of reward of all and, therefore, it is incompatible with liberty, which means freedom for everybody to develop his or her personality according to his or her nature.”

According to Prof. Ashrivatham, “The French Revolutionists were neither mad nor stupid when they made their way cry Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.”

Conclusion:
It is quite clear from the above discussion that both liberty and equality go together. They are not opposed to each other. One cannot be had without the other. Both are consistent and the progress of man is impossible till he can enjoy political liberty and economic equality. Both of them are compatible and complimentary. They must be enjoyed together to bring about maximum individual and social welfare. Both must exist side by side and in the absence of one we cannot have the other.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
What is implied by the term ‘Equality’?
Or
Give the meaning of Equality. .
Answer:
Equality does not mean that all persons may be treated euqal in all respects. Equality stands for the absence or removal of special privileges available to some and denied to others. The state should grant equal civil and political rights to all people, making no discrimination on the grounds of race, colour or income. All persons should be regarded as equal before the eyes of law. Equality also means that all men should be given adequate opportunities to develop their abilities. The state should provide suitable opportunities for everyone to develop his own genius.

Question 2.
Define Equality.
Answer:
Some of the important definitions of equality are as under:
According to Barker, “The principle of equality accordingly means that whatever conditions are guaranteed to me, in the form of rights, shall also, and in the same measure be guaranteed to me and that whatever rights are given to others shall also be given to me.” .

Accroding to Prof. Laski, “Undoubtedly, it implies fundamentally a certain levelling process. It means that no man shall be so placed in society that he can over-reach his neighbour to the extent which constitutes a denial of the latter’s citizenship”.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 3.
What do you understand by equal opportunities for all?
Answer:
Equality means that every man in the state should get equal and adequate opportunities for realizing his best self. The state should pass such laws that no one in the state should be denied the opportunity of developing his own geinius. No one should be deprived of the opportunity to make progress on the basis of caste, colour, creed and religion. Everybody should be governed by the same law of the land and all should be equal in the eyes of law.

Question 4.
What is the meaning of Economic Equality?
Answer:
Properly understood economic equality implies the elimination of excessive inequalities of material resources. Economic Equality does not mean that everybody should have equal income. But it does mean that every citizen should enjoy equal opportunities for earnining his livelihood. All the citizens should have the means to meet their needs. Economic equality also implies the absence of exploitation of man by man or of one class by another.’

Question 5.
What is Political Equality?
Answer:
Political Equality means that all the citizens should be treated equally in political sphere. According to Laski, by political equality is meant equal access of everyone to the avenue of authority. All the citizens should get equal political rights. Every citizen should get the right to vote, right to contest election, right to get government job, rigtht to criticise the Government and right to address petitions.

Nobody should be discriminated against on the basis of caste, colour, creed, religion and blood. Certain qualifications can be laid down for getting the right to vote but these conditions should not be laid down on the basis of caste, colour, creed and religion.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 6.
Explain four types of Equality.
Answer:
Four types of Equality are as follows:

  1. Civil Equality: Civil Equality means that every one in the state enjoys the same status in the sphere of private law.
  2. Social Equality: Social equality means that no distinction is made in the social status of the people on the ground of their riches, race class or caste.
  3. Political Equality: Political equality means that all the citizens should be treated equally in political sphere.
  4. Economic Equality: Economic equality means that there should be minimum inequality in the society and everyone should have equal opportunities to develop his natural faculties and power.

Very Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Discuss the meaning of Equality.
Answer:
Equality does not mean that all persons may be treated euqal in all respects. Equality stands for the absence or removal of special privileges available to some and denied to others. The state should grant equal civil and political rights to all people, making no discrimination on the grounds- of race, colour or income.

Question 2.
What is the meaning of Economie Equality?
Answer:
Properly understood economic equality implies the elimination of excessive inequalities of material resources. Every citizen should enjoy equal opportunities for eamining his livelihood. All the citizens should have the means to meet their needs.

Question 3.
What do you understand by Political equality?
Answer:
Political Equality means that all the citizens should be treated equally in political sphere. Every citizen should get the right to vote, right to contest election, right to get government job, rigtht to criticise the Government and right to address petitions. Nobody should be discriminated against on the basis of caste, colour, creed, religion and blood.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 4.
Mention any two kinds of Equality.
Answer:

  1. Social Equality: Social equality implies that no distinction is made in the social status of the people on the ground of race, class, caste, sex, religion etc.
  2. Economic Equality: Economic equality can exist when all people have reasonable economic opportunities to develop themselves.

One Word to One Sentence Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
What do you mean by Equality ?
Answer:
Every individualmust get equal facilities so that he may grow and develop in accordance with his ability.

Question 2.
Write down any one definition of Equality.
Answer:
According to Laski,“Equality means first of all the absence of special privileges. In the second place, it means that adequate opportunities are laid open to all.”

Question 3.
Mention any one feature of Equality.
Answer:
The main feature of equality is that no individual or class enjoys special rights.

Question 4.
Describe different kinds of Equality.
Answer:

  • Natural Equality
  • Civil Equality
  • Social Equality
  • Political Equality
  • Economic Equality.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 5.
What is the meaning of Natural Equality?
Answer:
Natural Equality means that nature has made all individuals equal. So all the individuals should be equally treated.

Question 6.
What is Civil Equality?
Answer:
Civil Equality means that all individuals should get equal rights. In other words, all men are equal before law.

Question 7.
What is meant by Social Equality?
Answer:
Social equality means that all individuals should be considered equal. They should not be discriminated on the basis of religion, caste, colour, sex and money.

Question 8.
What is meant by Political Equality?
Answer:
Political Equality means that all citizens, without any discrimination, should have the right to vote, to be elected, to petition and to hold any public office.

Question 9.
What is the meaning of Economic Equality?
Answer:
Economic inequality should be minimum in society. Every individual must get salary sufficient enough to fulfil his basic needs.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 10.
Liberty and Equality are opposed to each other. Discuss.
Answer:
Because of an open competition in the economic field, the rich will become more rich. It will increase economic inequality.

Question 11.
Liberty and Equality are not opposed to each other. Elucidate.
Answer:
The objective of both Liberty and Equality is the same. It is to provide facilities for the development of individual so that every individual may develop his personality.

Fill in the blanks

1. Justice is that state in which a ……………… can lead a well-set and disciplined life.
Answer:
Man

2. The word justice has been derived from ……………… word.
Answer:
Latin

3. According to ……………… “justice means to give every individual his due share.”
Answer:
Salmond

4. Truth is the basic postulate of ……………… .
Answer:
Justice

5. All citizens should equal before ……………… .
Answer:
Law.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

True or False statement

1. Justice and freedom are co-related.
Answer:
True

2. Social justice is extremely popular in modem age.
Answer:
True

3. Social justice -and Economic justice are not related to each other.
Answer:
False.

4. Men and women should get equal wages for equal work.
Answer:
True

5. It is not the state responsbility to establish economic justice.
Answer:
False.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Choose The Correct Answer

Question 1.
Justice require:
(A) Committed judiciary
(B) Fearful judges
(C) Independent judiciary
(D) Dishonest judges.
Answer:
(C) Independent judiciary

Question 2.
People get proper justice in:
(A) Dictatorship
(B) Totalitarian state
(C) Monarchy
(D) Democracy.
Answer:
(D) Democracy.

Question 3.
Which one of the following Is not the fundamental postulate of justice:
(A) Truth
(B) Equality before law
(C) Freedom
(D) Property.
Answer:
(D) Property.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 7 Equality-Meaning and Kinds

Question 4.
Justice la administered by:
(A) Executive
(B) Judiciary
(C) Legislature
(D) Political Parties
Answer:
(B) Judiciary

Question 5.
Justice Is essentially a:
(A) Legäl concept
(B) Moral concept
(C) Socia) concept
(D) All of the Above.
Answer:
(D) All of the Above.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Punjab State Board PSEB 10th Class English Book Solutions English Main Course Book Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 10 English Main Course Book Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Why was the stout lady walking down the middle of a road ?
Answer:
She thought she had liberty to walk wherever she liked. She said now they had got liberty.

वह समझती थी कि उसे इस बात की आज़ादी है कि वह जहाँ चाहे, चल सकती है। उसने कहा कि अब उन्हें आजादी प्राप्त हो गई थी।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Question 2.
How was the stout lady mistaken about liberty ?
Answer:
She failed to understand that if every man were free to do what he liked,there would be no freedom at all. There would be chaos everywhere.

वह इस बात को समझने में असफल रही कि यदि प्रत्येक आदमी वह करने को आजाद हो जो वह चाहता है, तो वहां बिल्कुल कोई आजादी नहीं रहेगी। सभी जगह अराजकता फैल जाएगी।

Question 3.
What does the policeman at Picadilly Circus symbolize ?
Answer:
He symbolizes the true meaning of liberty. He puts a little check on personal liberty so that there is social liberty.

वह स्वतन्त्रता के सच्चे अर्थ का प्रतीक है। वह निजी स्वतन्त्रता पर थोड़ी-सी रोक लगाता है ताकि वहां सामाजिक स्वतन्त्रता हो सके।

Question 4.
Can we do whatever we feel like doing?
Answer:
Liberty is not a personal affair. It is a social contract. So we can’t be free to do whatever we like to do.

स्वतन्त्रता कोई निजी बात नहीं होती। यह एक सामाजिक इकरारनामा होती है। इसलिए हम अपनी इच्छा का हर कोई काम करने को स्वतन्त्र नहीं हो सकते हैं।

Question 5.
What was the writer reading during the journey ?
Answer:
He was reading a Blue-book.

वह एक महत्त्वपूर्ण सूचनाओं वाली पुस्तक पढ़ रहा था।

Question 6.
Why did the writer need a reasonable silence in the compartment ?
Answer:
The writer was not reading the book for pleasure. He was reading it for a serious purpose. That was why he needed a reasonable silence.

लेखक पुस्तक को आनन्द के लिए नहीं पढ़ रहा था। वह इसे एक गम्भीर उद्देश्य के लिए पढ़ रहा था। इसी कारण से उसे यथोचित शान्ति की आवश्यकता थी।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Question 7.
Who disturbed the author on the train ?
Answer:
Two passengers boarded the train. One of them kept talking loudly. The author couldn’t concentrate on the book he wanted to read.

दो यात्री गाड़ी में सवार हुए। उनमें से एक ऊंचे-ऊंचे स्वर में बोलता रहा। लेखक अपना ध्यान उस पुस्तक में केन्द्रित न कर पाया जो वह पढ़ना चाहता था।

Question 8.
What was the intruding passenger talking of ?
Answer:
He was not talking of any particular thing. He was talking of any and every subject under the sun.

वह किसी विशेष विषय पर बात नहीं कर रहा था। वह कल्पना किए जा सकने वाले किसी भी और सभी विषयों पर बोल रहा था।

Question 9.
What is the basis of social contract ?
Answer:
A reasonable consideration for the rights of others is the basis of social contract.

दूसरों के अधिकारों के प्रति उचित सम्मान रखना सामाजिक समझौते का आधार होता है।

Question 10.
We should be a judicious mixture of both.What does the writer mean by this statement ?
Answer:
There can neither be complete social liberty nor complete individual liberty. There must be a judicious mixture of both.

वहां न तो पूर्ण रूप से सामाजिक स्वतन्त्रता हो सकती है और न ही व्यक्तिगत स्वतन्त्रता। वहां अवश्य दोनों का विवेकपूर्ण मिश्रण होना चाहिए।

Long Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
What is the theme of the essay, ‘The Rule of the Road ? Explain.
Answer:
Liberty is not a personal affair. It is a social contract. Our personal liberty must not become a cause of nuisance for others. It is good to have personal liberty, but we must have reasonable consideration for the rights of others. Only then we can sweeten the journey of life.

स्वतन्त्रता कोई निजी बात नहीं होती है। यह एक सामाजिक समझौता होता है। हमारी निजी स्वतन्त्रता दूसरों के लिए सिरदर्दी नहीं बननी चाहिए। निजी स्वतन्त्रता होना अच्छी बात होती है किन्तु हमें दूसरों के अधिकारों के प्रति उपयुक्त सम्मान रखना चाहिए। केवल तभी हम जीवन-रूपी यात्रा को मधुर बना सकते हैं।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Question 2.
Describe, in your own words, how the writer was disturbed during his train journey.
Answer:
During his train journey, the writer wanted to do some serious reading. But two men boarded the train and sat next to him. One of them started talking loudly. He kept talking irrelevantly all the time. He made it impossible for the writer to continue with his reading.

अपनी रेल-यात्रा के दौरान लेखक कोई गम्भीर पढ़ने का काम करना चाहता था। किन्तु दो आदमी गाड़ी में सवार हो गए और उसकी बगल में बैठ गए। उनमें से एक ऊंचे स्वर में बातें करने लगा। वह पूरा समय असंगत बातें करता रहा। उसने लेखक के लिए अपना पढ़ने का काम जारी रखना असम्भव बना दिया।

Question 3.
‘Liberty is not a personal affair only, but a social contract.’ Explain.
Answer:
Liberty is not a personal affair; it is a social contract. Unrestrained personal liberty can lead to chaos only. Our personal liberty should not intrude into the liberty of others. It should not become a nuisance for others. In order to sweeten the journey of life, we should have a reasonable regard for the liberty of others.

आज़ादी कोई निजी विषय नहीं होता; यह एक सामाजिक समझौता होता है। अनियन्त्रित निजी आजादी केवल अव्यवस्था की ओर ले जा सकती है। हमारी निजी आजादी को दूसरों की आज़ादी में घुसपैठ नहीं करना चाहिए। यह दूसरों के लिए सिरदर्दी नहीं बननी चाहिए। जीवन रूपी यात्रा को मधुर बनाने के लिए हमें दूसरों की आजादी के प्रति उचित सम्मान प्रदर्शित करना चाहिए।

Vocabulary and Grammar

Question 1.
Match the phrases in Column A with their meanings in Column B :
Answer:
A ——– B
A pointed out — showed, explained
of course — without doubt
to have a fancy for — to have a liking for
to be indifferent to — to ignore
to occur — to come to mind
to look after — to take care of
to fly into passion — to go mad
to rush out — to come out quickly
to reflect on — to think about

Question 2.
Add the correct suffixes to the words given in the brackets and fill in the blanks, choosing words from the list given below :
Answer:
1. We must work hard for our freedom.
2. The difference between madness and wisdom is measured by success.
3. Human journey from childhood to manhood is full of surprises.
4. Truthfulness is essential for sweetness in life.
5. Parenthood is an art.
6. Happiness is an intrinsic quality.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Question 3.
Fill in the blanks with suitable words from amongst those given in the box :
Answer:
There once lived in Athens a very wise man called Diogenes. He was an eccentric fellow. To show people how he despised wealth and luxury, he lived in an old tub. One day he came to the marketplace with a lighted lantern in broad daylight. He looked at the face of everyone he met with his lantern. People followed him wondering as to what he was searching for. But he did not answer their questions. At last he blew out his lantern and went into his tub. When people pressed him for an answer, he replied, “I was looking for an honest man; but there is not a single such man in all Athens.”

Question 4.
Punctuate the following sentences : Answer:
(a) “But why? Isn’t it absurd ?” I persisted. “I can buy as many things as I like,” he replied.
(b) John said, “I am in a hurry and can’t spare time.”
(c) Phatik was furious. He cried, “If you don’t get down this minute, I’ll thrash you.”
(d) “What an easy paper !” said Ashok. “Was it set by a kind examiner ?”
(e) On Tuesday, the Prime Minister of Afghanistan would reach India.

Question 5.
Rearrange the following words and phrases to form meaningful sentences :
Answer:
(a) Cricket is a game of glorious uncertainties.
(b) Mumbai is a very large city.
(c) Jupiter, the largest planet in the solar system, has thirty-nine satellites.
(d) The equator is an imaginary line that divides the earth into two equal halves.

Question 6.
Fill in the blanks with correct form of the verbs given in brackets :
Answer:
(a) Sitar maestro Pandit Ravi Shankar has been nominated for this year’s Grammy Award for his album, ‘Full Circle’.
(b) This is the fourth time he has been nominated for the music world’s top award.
(c) Shankar has already won two Grammy Awards.
(d) ‘Full Circle’, which was recorded in October 2000, features Shankar’s rendering of the night raga Kaushi Kanhara.

Objective Type Questions

Question 1.
What is liberty ?
(i) A personal affair.
(ii) A social contract.
(iii) Both of these.
(iv) None of these.
Answer:
(ii) A social contract.

Question 2.
What was the author reading during the journey ?
Answer:
He was reading a Blue-book

Question 3.
We should interfere in the liberty of others. (True/False)
Answer:
False

Question 4.
The stout old lady was walking in the middle of the
(i) road
(ii) pavement
(iii) railway track
(iv) none of these.
Answer:
(i) road

Question 5.
The policeman at Picadilly Circus is the symbol of ……..
(i) liberty
(ii) tyranny
(iii) anarchy
(iv) none of these.
Answer:
(i) liberty

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Question 6.
A reasonable consideration for the …………. of others is the foundation of social conduct.
(i) duties
(ii) friends
(iii) rights
(iv) relatives.
Answer:
(iii) rights

Answer each of the following in one word / phrase / sentence :

Question 1.
Name the author of the chapter.
Answer:
A.G. Gardiner.

Question 2.
What is the author’s purpose in writing this essay ?
Answer:
To tell us how we should behave while using the roads.

Question 3.
What was the undesirable thing the lady was doing in Petrograd ?
Answer:
She was causing confusion all around.

Question 4.
What did the lady wrongly think ?
Answer:
She thought she was free to do anything she liked.

Question 5.
Is a policeman controlling the traffic a symbol of tyranny ?
Answer:
No, he is truly a symbol of liberty.

Question 6.
How can we enjoy a good social order ?
Answer:
By allowing our liberty to be curtailed a bit.

Question 7.
Can I be allowed to do whatever I feel like ?
Answer:
No, I can do nothing that affects other people’s liberty.

Question 8.
Why was the author feeling uncomfortable in the train ?
Answer:
Because his co-passengers went on chatting very loudly.

Question 9.
Can we be complete anarchists or completely socialists ?
Answer:
No, we can and must try to be a judicious mixture of both.

Question 10.
Can I choose to make my son a pickpocket ?
Answer:
No, such an unsocial act is not allowed in a civilized society.

Complete the following:

1. The lady in Petrograd had no respect for …………
2. The excessive individual liberty is liable to become a social
3. The policeman at the Picadilly circus is a symbol of …………………. not of tyranny.
4. In my own matters, I can be as ………………… as I like.
5. We are more conscious of ………………… than of our own.
6. Good social conduct implies a ……………. consideration for the rights of others.
Answer:
1. rule of the road
2. anarchy
3. liberty
4. free
5. the faults of others
6. reasonable.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

Write True or False against each statement :

1. The lady in the story was walking in London.
2. Picadilly Circus is in Petrograd.
3. Our liberty should not cause inconvenience to others.
4. The two men in the railway carriage were aware of the rule of the road.
5. The author wanted to read a novel in the train.
6. A civilized person always has a consideration for the rights of others.
7. Liberty is merely a personal affair, not a social contract.
Answer:
1. False
2. False
3. True
4. False
5. False
6. True
7. False.

Choose the correct option for each of the following :

Question 1.
The lady in the story was walking in the middle of ……….
(a) a street
(b) a thoroughfare
(c) the pavement
(d) a crowded platform.
Answer:
(a) a street

Question 2.
The policeman at the Picadilly circus was …….
(a) an arrogant person
(b) talking loudly
(c) disrespectful to the ladies
(d) a symbol of liberty.
Answer:
(d) a symbol of liberty.

Question 3.
We have to sacrifice a bit of …………. in a civilized society.
(a) our personal liberty
(b) other people’s liberty
(c) truthfulness
(d) none of these three.
Answer:
(a) our personal liberty

Question 4.
In my personal matters, I am ………..
(a) bound by religion
(b) free to do what I like
(c) to be honest
(d) I am not free
Answer:
(b) free to do what I like

Question 5.
“The rule of the road
(a) is an indicator of our civility
(b) can be flouted
(c) has least importance
(d) is just an essay.
Answer:
(a) is an indicator of our civility

The Rule of the Road Summary & Translation in English

The Rule of the Road Introduction:
We have the liberty to do what we like, but our liberty should not interfere with the liberty of others. If every man were free to do what he likes, there would be chaos everywhere. The rule of the road means that to preserve the liberties of all, the liberties of everybody must be curtailed. That is what a policeman on the road does.

Liberty is not a personal affair. It is a compromise or social contract. We are free in matters which don’t touch the liberty of anyone. But in matters which affect the liberty of others, we have to curtail our liberty. We should never do anything that can cause discomfort to those around us.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

For example, we should not talk aloud while travelling in a train if someone sitting close to us wants to read or do something in quiet. A reasonable consideration for the rights of others is the foundation of social conduct. This is the only test of our being civilized or uncivilized. Society has to respect the liberty of the individual and the individual has to respect the liberty of society. There can neither be complete social liberty nor complete individual liberty. It is a judicious mixture of both.

The Rule of the Road Summary & Translation in English

(Page 110)

That was a jolly story which Mr Arthur Ransome told the other day in one of his messages from Petrograd. A stout old lady was walking with her basket down the middle of a street in Petrograd to the great confusion of the traffic and with no small peril to herself. It was pointed out to her that the pavement was the place for foot passengers, but she replied : ‘I’m going to walk where I like.

We’ve got liberty now.’ It did not occur to the dear old lady that if liberty entitled the foot passenger to walk down the middle of a road, it also entitled the car driver to drive on the pavement, and that the end of such liberty would be universal chaos. Everybody would be getting in everybody else’s way and nobody would get anywhere. Individual liberty would have become social anarchy.

There is a danger of the world getting liberty-drunk in these days like the old lady with the basket, and it is just as well to remind ourselves of what the rule of the road means. It means that in order that the liberties of all may be preserved, the liberties of everybody must be curtailed. When the policeman, say at Picadilly Circus, steps into the middle of the road and puts out his hand, he is the symbol not of tyranny, but of liberty.

You may not think so. You may, being in a hurry and seeing your motor car pulled up by this insolence of office, feel that your liberty has been outraged. How dare this fellow interfere with your free use of the public highway ? Then, if you are a reasonable person, you will reflect that if he did not, incidentally, interfere with you he would interfere with no one, and the result would be that Picadilly Circus would be a maelstrom that you would never cross at all. You have submitted to a curtailment of private liberty in order that you may enjoy a social order which makes your liberty a reality.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

(Page 111)

Liberty is not a personal affair only, but a social contract. It is an accommodation of interests. In matters which do not touch anybody else’s liberty, of course, I may be as free as I like. If I choose to go down the Strand in a dressing-gown with long hair and bare feet, who shall raise on objection ? You have liberty to laugh at me, but I have liberty to be indifferent to you. And if I have a fancy for dyeing my hair, or waxing my moustache or wearing a tall hat, a frock-coat and sandals, or going to bed late or getting up early, I shall follow my fancy and ask no man’s permission.

In all these and a thousand other details you and I please ourselves and ask no one’s leave. We have a whole kingdom in which we rule alone, can do what we choose, be wise or ridiculous, harsh or easy, conventional or odd. But directly we step out of that kingdom, our personal liberty of action becomes qualified by other people’s liberty. I might like to practise on the guitar from midnight till three in the morning.

If I went on to the top of a hill to do it, I could please myself, but if I do it out in the streets, the neighbours will remind me that my liberty to play on a guitar must not interfere with their liberty to sleep in quiet. There are a lot of people in the world, and I have to accommodate my liberty to their liberties. We are all liable to forget this and, unfortunately, we are much more conscious of the imperfections of others in this respect than of our own.

(Page 112)

I got into a railway carriage at a country station the other morning and settled down for what the school-boys would call an hour’s ‘swot’ at a Blue- book. I was not reading it for pleasure. The truth is that I never do read Blue- books for pleasure. I read them as a lawyer reads a brief, for the very humble purpose of turning an honest penny out of them. Now, if you are reading a book for pleasure it doesn’t matter what is going on around you. I think I could enjoy a really good novel even in the midst of an earthquake.

But when you are reading a thing as a task, you need reasonable quiet, and that is what I didn’t get, for at the next station in came a couple of men, one of whom talked to his friend for the rest of the journey in a loud and pompous voice on any and every subject under the sun.
If I had asked him to be good enough to talk in a lower tone, I daresay he would have thought I was a very rude fellow.

It did not occur to him that anybody could have anything better to do than to listen to him, and I have no doubt he left the carriage convinced that everybody in it had, thanks to him, had a very illuminating journey, and would carry away a pleasing impression of his great knowledge. He was obviously a well-intentioned person. The thing that was wrong with him was that he had not the social sense. He was not ‘a clubbable man’. A reasonable consideration for the rights or feelings of others is the foundation of social conduct.

Let us take the guitar as an illustration again. A man who wants to learn to play on it is entitled to learn it in his own house, even though he is a nuisance to his neighbours, but it is his business to make the nuisance as slight as possible. He must practise in the attic and shut the window. He has no right to sit in his front room, open the window, and blow his noise into his neighbours’ ears with the maximum of violence.

You are interfering with the liberties of your neighbours if you don’t do what you can to limit the noise to your own household. Your neighbours may prefer to have their Sunday afternoon undisturbed, and it is as great an impertinence for you to wilfully 10 trespass on their peace as it would be to go, unasked, into their gardens and trample on their flower beds.

(Page 113)

There are cases, of course, where the clash of liberties seems to defy compromise. My dear old friend X, who lives in West End Square and who is an amazing mixture of good nature and irascibility, flies into a passion when he hears a street piano, and rushes out to order it away. But nearby lives a distinguished lady of romantic picaresque tastes, who dotes on street pianos, and attracts them as wasps are attracted to a jar of jam. Whose liberty in this case should surrender to the other ? For the like of me, I cannot say. It is as reasonable to like street pianos as to dislike them and vice versa. I would give much to hear Sancho Panza’s solution of such a nice riddle.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

I suppose the fact is, that we can be neither complete anarchists nor complete socialists in this complex world. We must be a judicious mixture of both. We have both liberties to preserve, our individual liberty and our social liberty. I shall not permit any authority to say that my child must go to this school or that, shall specialize in science or arts, shall play cricket or soccer.

These things are personal. But if I proceed to say that my child shall have no education at all, that he shall be brought up as a primeval savage, or at Mr Fagin’s academy for pickpockets, then society will politely but firmly tell me that it has no use for primeval savages and a very stern objection to pickpockets, and that my child must have a certain minimum of education whether I like it or not. I cannot have the liberty to be nuisance to my neighbours or make my child a burden and a danger to the commonwealth.

It is in the small matters of conduct, in the observance of the rule of the road, that we pass judgement upon ourselves, and declare that we are civilized or uncivilized. The great moments of heroism and sacrifice are rare. It is the little habits of commonplace intercourse that make up the great sum of life and sweeten or make bitter the journey. I hope my friend in the railway carriage will reflect on this.

The Rule of the Road Summary & Translation in Hindi

The Rule of the Road Introduction:
हमें वह करने की आज़ादी है जो हम करना चाहते हैं, लेकिन हमारी आजादी दूसरों की आज़ादी में बाधा नहीं बननी चाहिए। यदि प्रत्येक व्यक्ति वह करने को आज़ाद हो जो वह चाहता है, तो सभी जगह अराजकता फैल जाएगी। सड़क के नियम का मतलब यह है कि सभी लोगों के स्वतन्त्र अधिकारों को बनाए रखने के लिए, सभी के स्वतन्त्र अधिकारों में कांट-छांट करनी ज़रूरी होती है।

सड़क पर तैनात किया गया पुलिस कर्मी यही काम करता है। स्वतन्त्रता कोई निजी बात नहीं होती। यह एक समझौता अथवा सामाजिक इकरारनामा होता है। हम ऐसे विषयों में स्वतन्त्र होते हैं जो दूसरों की स्वतन्त्रता को छूते नहीं हैं। किन्तु ऐसे विषयों में, जो दूसरों की स्वतन्त्रता को प्रभावित करते हों, हमें अपनी स्वतन्त्रता को सीमित करना होता है।

हमें कभी कोई ऐसा काम नहीं करना चाहिए जो हमारे इर्द-गिर्द के लोगों के लिए असुविधाजनक हो। उदाहरण के रूप में, हमें गाड़ी में यात्रा करते समय ऊँचा नहीं बोलना चाहिए यदि हमारी बगल में बैठा हुआ कोई आदमी पढ़ना चाह रहा हो अथवा खामोशी में कोई दूसरा काम करना चाह रहा हो। दूसरों के अधिकारों के लिए उचित सम्मान सामाजिक व्यवहार का आधार होता है। हमारे सभ्य या असभ्य होने की यही एकमात्र परख होती है। समाज को व्यक्ति की स्वतन्त्रता का सम्मान करना होता है और व्यक्ति को समाज की स्वतन्त्रता का। पूर्ण रूप से न तो सामाजिक स्वतन्त्रता हो सकती है और न ही व्यक्तिगत स्वतन्त्रता। यह दोनों का विवेकपूर्ण मिश्रण होता है।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

The Rule of the Road Summary & Translation in Hindi

(Page 110)

यह एक मज़ेदार कहानी थी जो उस दिन मिस्टर आर्थर रेन्सम ने पैट्रोग्राड से भेजे गए अपने सन्देशों में से एक सन्देश में बताई थी। एक हृष्ट-पुष्ट बूढ़ी औरत अपनी टोकरी उठाए हुए पैट्रोग्राड (पूर्ववर्ती रूस की राजधानी) की एक सड़क के बीचों-बीच चली जा रही थी। जिसके कारण यातायात में बहुत गड़बड़ पैदा हो रही थी तथा ऐसा करना स्वयं उस औरत के लिए भी कोई कम खतरनाक नहीं था। उसे बताया गया कि पैदल चलने वालों के लिए सड़क के साथ वाली पटरी उपयुक्त स्थान होता है, किन्तु वह औरत कहने लगी, “जहाँ मैं चाहती हूँ, वहीं चलूँगी। अब हमें आजादी मिल गई है।” उस प्यारी बूढ़ी औरत के दिमाग में यह बात न आई कि यदि स्वतन्त्रता का अर्थ पैदल चलने वालों को सड़क के मध्य चलने का अधिकार है तो इस का अर्थ यह भी है कि गाड़ी चलाने वालों को पटरी के ऊपर अपनी गाड़ी चलाने का अधिकार है और इस सबका अन्तिम परिणाम यह होगा कि सभी जगह अव्यवस्था फैल जाएगी।

प्रत्येक व्यक्ति दूसरे व्यक्ति के रास्ते में फंसने लगेगा और कोई भी कहीं पहुँच नहीं पाएगा। इस तरह व्यक्तिगत स्वतन्त्रता सामाजिक अराजकता का रूप धारण कर लेगी। टोकरी वाली बूढ़ी महिला की भांति आजकल संसार के लोगों को स्वतन्त्रता का नशा होने का खतरा बन आया है। इसलिए उचित रहेगा कि हम स्वयं को याद दिलाएँ कि सड़क के नियम का अर्थ क्या होता है। इसका अर्थ यह होता है कि सभी व्यक्तियों की स्वतन्त्रताओं में कुछ कांट-छांट की जाए ताकि प्रत्येक व्यक्ति की स्वतन्त्रताओं को बनाए रखा जा सके। उदाहरण के रूप में, जब कोई पुलिसकर्मी पिकाडिली सर्कस (लंदन का एक व्यस्त व्यापारिक चौराहा) के मध्य में आकर अपना हाथ उठा लेता है, तो उस समय वह किसी अत्याचार का प्रतीक नहीं होता है, अपितु स्वतन्त्रता का प्रतीक होता है। हो सकता है आप ऐसा न सोचें। हो सकता है आप जल्दी में हों और समझें कि पुलिसकर्मी का व्यवहार अभद्र है जिसने आप की गाड़ी को रोक दिया है, और इस तरह आप समझें कि आप की आजादी का अपमान किया गया है।

आप सोच सकते हैं कि उसकी हिम्मत कैसे हुई जो उसने सड़क के स्वतन्त्र इस्तेमाल करने के आपके अधिकार में विघ्न डाला। किन्तु यदि आप एक विवेकी आदमी हैं तो आप सोचेंगे कि यदि उसने आपको न टोका होता तो वह किसी अन्य को भी न टोकता और इसका परिणाम यह होता कि पिकाडिली सर्कस वाली जगह एक भंवर बन गई होती जिसे पार करने में आप कभी सफल न हुए होते। आप अपनी निजी स्वतन्त्रता में कुछ कमी के लिए सहमत हो गए ताकि आप एक ऐसी सामाजिक व्यवस्था का आनन्द ले सकें जो आपकी स्वतन्त्रता को सचमुच एक वास्तविकता बना दे।

(Page 111)

स्वतन्त्रता मात्र एक निजी विषय नहीं होता, यह एक सामाजिक समझौता होता है। इसका अर्थ है – आपसी हितों का समझौता। ऐसे विषयों में जहां किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की स्वतन्त्रता प्रभावित न होती हो, हम जितना चाहें उतना स्वतन्त्र हो सकते हैं। यदि हमारे मन में आए कि हमें स्ट्रैण्ड पर एक ड्रेसिंग गाउन पहने हुए जाना है, लम्बे-लम्बे बाल और नंगे पांव लिए, तो कौन इस पर आपत्ति करेगा ? आपको आज़ादी है कि आप मेरा मजाक उड़ाएं, लेकिन मुझे भी आजादी है कि मैं आपके मज़ाक की उपेक्षा करूं और यदि मेरे मन में आए कि मुझे अपने बाल रंगने हैं, अथवा अपनी मूंछों को ताव देना है अथवा एक लम्बा टोप पहनना है, या एक फ्राक के आकार का कोट और सैण्डल पहनने हैं, अथवा देर से सोना है और जल्दी उठना है, तो मैं अपनी चाहत को पूरा कर सकता हूं और मुझे किसी आदमी की इजाजत लेने की जरूरत नहीं है।

इन सभी विषयों में तथा हज़ारों अन्य विषयों में हम जैसा चाहें कर सकते हैं, और हमें किसी की अनुमति लेने की ज़रूरत नहीं होती। एक पूरा क्षेत्र होता है जहां केवल हमारा ही साम्राज्य होता है और जहां हम जैसा चाहें कर सकते हैं – हम बुद्धिमत्ता का व्यवहार कर सकते हैं अथवा मूर्खता का, हम कठोर बन सकते हैं अथवा सुलभ, आधुनिक विचारों वाले बन सकते हैं या रूढ़िवादी। किन्तु ज्योंही हम इस साम्राज्य के क्षेत्र से बाहर कदम रखते हैं, कोई भी क्रिया करने की हमारी निजी स्वतन्त्रता दूसरे लोगों की स्वतन्त्रता द्वारा सीमित हो जाती है। हो सकता है मेरा दिल चाहे कि मैं आधी रात से ले कर प्रात: तीन बजे तक अपनी गिटार पर अभ्यास करूँ। ऐसा करने के लिए यदि मैं किसी पहाड़

की चोटी पर चला जाऊँ तो मैं जैसा चाहे कर सकता हूं; किन्तु यदि यही काम मैं गलियों में करने लगा तो मेरे पड़ोसी मुझे याद दिलाएंगे कि गिटार बजाने की मेरी आज़ादी उनकी आराम से सोने की आज़ादी में विघ्न नहीं बननी चाहिए। संसार में अनेकों लोग हैं और मुझे अपनी स्वतन्त्रता को उनकी स्वतन्त्रता के अनुसार ढालना होता है। दुर्भाग्यवश हम यह भूल जाते हैं, तथा इस सन्दर्भ में अपनी कमजोरियों की अपेक्षा दूसरों की कमजोरियों की तरफ़ हमारा ज्यादा ध्यान रहता है।

(Page 112)

पिछले दिनों एक प्रातः मैं किसी ग्रामीण स्टेशन से रेलगाड़ी में सवार हुआ और यात्रा के एक घण्टे भर के समय के लिए संसद की रिपोर्ट पर लिखी एक पुस्तिका पढ़ने बैठ गया जिसे कोई स्कूली लड़का गहन पढ़ाई का नाम देगा। मैं इसे किसी मनोरंजन के लिए नहीं पढ़ रहा था। सच्ची बात यह है कि मैं कभी भी ब्लू बुक्स को मनोरंजन के लिए नहीं पढ़ता हूँ। मैं उन्हें वैसे ही पढ़ता हूँ जैसे कोई वकील किसी विषय के सारांश को पढ़ता है ताकि उसमें से कोई ईमानदारी की कमाई की जा सके।

अब यदि आप किसी पुस्तक को मनोरंजन के लिए पढ़ रहें हों, तो इस बात से कोई अन्तर नहीं पड़ता कि आपके गिर्द क्या हो रहा है। मेरे विचार में मैं किसी वास्तव में ही अच्छे उपन्यास को एक भूचाल के दौरान भी पढ़ सकता हूँ। किन्तु जब आप कोई पुस्तक किसी गंभीर काम के लिए पढ़ रहे हों तो आप को उपयुक्त शान्त वातावरण की ज़रूरत होती है जो कि मुझे गाड़ी में प्राप्त न हो सका, क्योंकि आगे के स्टेशन पर दो व्यक्ति डिब्बे में आ कर सवार हो गए।

उनमें से एक व्यक्ति पूरी शेष यात्रा के दौरान अपने मित्र के साथ एक ऊँची और खोखली दिखावटी आवाज़ में किसी भी और सभी विषयों पर बातें करता चला गया। यदि मैंने उस व्यक्ति से थोड़ा धीमा बोलने को कहा होता तो मैं कह सकता हूँ कि उसने अवश्य ही मुझे एक गुस्ताख आदमी समझ लेना था। उसके दिमाग़ में यह बात बिल्कुल न आई कि उसकी बातें सुनने से बेहतर कोई अन्य काम भी किसी को हो सकता था, और मुझे पूरा विश्वास है कि जब वह गाड़ी में से उतरा तो वह पूरा विश्वास लिए गया होगा कि डिब्बे में बैठे प्रत्येक व्यक्ति ने बहुत ज्ञानवर्धक यात्रा का आनन्द लिया होगा और उसे धन्यवाद देता होगा, तथा वह यह सोच कर और भी प्रसन्न होता होगा कि उसका ज्ञान कितना विशाल था। वह आदमी स्पष्टतः दिल का अच्छा था। जिस बात की उसमें खराबी थी, वह यह थी कि उसमें सामाजिक बुद्धि नहीं थी। वह किसी संगति में बैठने की बुद्धि नहीं रखता था।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Chapter 8 The Rule of the Road

दूसरों के अधिकारों तथा उनकी भावनाओं के प्रति उचित ध्यान रखना सामाजिक व्यवहार की नींव होता है। आइए गिटार वाले उदाहरण को हम एक बार फिर से लेते हैं। कोई व्यक्ति जो इसे बजाना सीखना चाहता है उसे अधिकार है कि वह इसे अपने घर में सीखे, यद्यपि वह अपने पड़ोसियों के लिए एक सिरदर्दी हो, किन्तु यह उसका कर्त्तव्य है कि वह इस सिरदर्दी को कम-से-कम बनाए। उसे अपनी अटारी में बैठ कर ही अभ्यास करना चाहिए और खिड़की बन्द कर लेनी चाहिए। उसे कोई अधिकार नहीं है कि वह अपने आगे वाले कमरे में आ कर बैठ जाए, खिड़की खोल दे, और अधिकतम ऊंचे स्तर में अपना शोर पड़ोसियों के कानों में धकेले। आप अपने पड़ोसियों की स्वतन्त्रताओं में विघ्न डाल रहे होंगे यदि आप अपने ही घर तक शोर को सीमित रखने के लिए वह काम नहीं करते जो आप कर सकते हों। हो सकता है आप के पड़ोसी रविवार का तीसरा पहर बिना किसी खलल के आराम से बिताना चाहते हों, और उन की शान्ति में जानबूझ कर विघ्न डालना उतनी ही बड़ी गुस्ताखी होगी जितनी उनके बाग में अनधिकार घुस जाना और उनकी फूलों की क्यारियों को अपने पैरों नीचे रौंद देना।

(Page 113)

निस्सन्देह ऐसी स्थितियां आ जाती हैं जहां आज़ादियों की भिड़न्त में कोई समझौता कर पाना असम्भव हो जाता है। मेरा प्रिय पुराना मित्र मिस्टर एक्स जो वेस्ट एण्ड स्क्वे अर में रहता है तथा जो सौम्यता और क्रोध का एक अचम्भाजनक मिश्रण है, वह अति क्रोधित हो उठता है जब उसे गली में किसी पियानो के बजने की आवाज़ आती है, और इसे वहां से भगाने के लिए दौड़ कर बाहर निकल आता है। किन्तु समीप ही एक विशिष्ट वृद्धा स्त्री रहती है जिसे रोमांचकारी और खल-कथाओं वाले उपन्यासों का शौक है, जिसे गली में पियानो बजाने वाले अति अच्छे लगते हैं, तथा उन्हें उसी प्रकार आकर्षित कर लेती है जैसे मीठी चटनी के किसी मर्तबान के ऊपर भिड़ें खिंची आती हैं।

इस अवस्था में किसकी आजादी को दूसरे के सामने झुकना चाहिए? जहां तक मेरा सम्बन्ध है, मेरे पास इसका कोई उत्तर नहीं है। पियानो को पसन्द करने की बात उतनी ही तर्कसंगत है, जितनी इससे घृणा करने की, और इसके विपरीत भी। इस तरह की पहेली का हल मेरे विचार से सैंको पेन्ज़ा से ही करवाया जाना चाहिए। मेरे विचार में वास्तविकता यह है कि इस जटिल संसार में हम न तो पूरी तरह से अराजकतावादी बन सकते हैं, और न ही पूरी तरह से समाजवादी।

हमें इन दोनों का एक समझदारी वाला मिश्रण बनाना होगा। हमें तरह की आज़ादियों को सुरक्षित रखना होगा अपनी निजी स्वतन्त्रता को और अपनी सामाजिक स्वतन्त्रता को। मैं किसी भी सत्ता को इस बात की इजाजत नहीं दूंगा कि वह इस बात का निर्णय करे कि मेरे बच्चे को इस स्कूल में जाना होगा या उस स्कूल में, विज्ञान का अध्ययन करना होगा या आर्टस का, क्रिकेट खेलना होगा या फुटबाल। यह बातें निजी हैं। किन्तु यदि मैं यह कहने लगूं कि मेरे बच्चे को कोई शिक्षा नहीं दी जाएगी, कि उसका पालन-पोषणं एक असभ्य जंगली की भांति किया जाएगा, अथवा उसे मिस्टर फागिन की अकादमी में जेब-तराशी का प्रशिक्षण दिया जाएगा, तो समाज इस बात को विनम्रतापूर्वक किन्तु दृढ़ता से मुझे बताएगा कि इसे जंगली किस्म के लोगों की कोई जरूरत नहीं है, और इसे जेबतराशों के सम्बन्ध में सख्त आपत्ति है, तथा यह कहेगा कि मुझे पसन्द हो या न हो, मेरे बच्चे को कुछ कम-से-कम शिक्षा अवश्य ग्रहण करनी होगी। मुझे इस बात की आजादी नहीं दी जा सकती कि मैं अपने पड़ोसियों के लिए सिरदर्दी बनूं या अपने बच्चे को

समाज के लिए कोई बोझ या ख़तरा बना दूं। साधारण व्यवहार की ये छोटी-छोटी बातें ही होती हैं, जैसे सड़क के नियम का पालन करना, जिनके द्वारा हम स्वयं को जांच सकते हैं और कह सकते हैं कि हम सभ्य हैं अथवा असभ्य। बहादुरी या बलिदान के अवसर कभी-कभार ही आते हैं। ये साधारण आपसी व्यवहार की छोटी-छोटी बातें ही होती हैं जो जीवन में महत्त्व रखती हैं और जीवन-रूपी सफ़र को मधुर या कड़वा बनाती हैं। मुझे आशा है कि रेल के डिब्बे वाला मेरा मित्र इस बात पर विचार करेगा।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

Punjab State Board PSEB 10th Class English Book Solutions English Main Course Book Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 10 English Main Course Book Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

Question 1.
Write a summary of the poem in your own words.
Answer:
Pertab Singh was the king of Jodhpore. He had a friend who was an Englishman. Suddenly, the friend died. Pertab Singh himself carried his friend’s bier. He did not care for the warning of priests who said that he would lose his caste by carrying the bier of an Englishman.

प्रताब सिंह जोधपुर का राजा था। उसका एक अंग्रेज़ मित्र था। अचानक मित्र की मृत्यु हो गई। प्रताब सिंह ने स्वयं अपने मित्र की अरथी उठाई। उसने पण्डितों की चेतावनी की परवाह न की जो कहते थे कि एक अंग्रेज़ की अरथी उठाने से वह अपनी जाति खो बैठेगा।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

Question 2.
What is the central idea of the poem ?
Answer:
This poem brings out the folly of the caste system. All men are equal in the eyes of God. No one is high or low by caste. Humanity is the only true caste. A caste that divides men from men can’t be called a true caste.

यह कविता जाति-प्रथा की मूर्खता को व्यक्त करती है। सभी लोग ईश्वर की दृष्टि में बराबर हैं। जाति से कोई बड़ा या छोटा नहीं होता। मानवता ही एकमात्र सच्ची जाति है। ऐसी जाति जो मनुष्यों को मनुष्यों से बांटती हो, उसे सच्ची जाति नहीं कहा जा सकता।

Question 3.
Who was Sir Pertab Singh ?
Answer:
Sir Pertab Singh was the king of Jodhpore. He lived in the Red-rose House. He was a true friend. He did not believe in the caste system. For him, the caste of a soldier was the only true caste.

सर प्रताब सिंह जोधपुर का राजा था। वह रेड-रोज हाऊस में रहता था। वह एक सच्चा मित्र था। वह जाति प्रथा में विश्वास नहीं रखता था। उसके अनुसार एक सैनिक की जाति एकमात्र सच्ची जाति होती है।

Question 4.
Why did Pertab Singh immediately like the English soldier ?
Answer:
The Englishman looked every inch a soldier. Pertab Singh himself was a true soldier. That was why he liked him immediately. He did not believe in any differences of caste. For him the caste of a soldier was the only true caste.

अंग्रेज़ पूरी तरह से एक सच्चा सैनिक दिखाई देता था। प्रताब सिंह स्वयं एक सच्चा सैनिक था। इस कारण से वह उसे तुरन्त पसन्द करने लगा। वह जाति के किसी भेद-भाव में विश्वास नहीं करता था। उसके लिए एक सैनिक की जाति ही एकमात्र सच्ची जाति थी।

Question 5.
How did the two comrades spend their days ?
Answer:
The two comrades spent their days together. They would go riding in the morning and in the evening. They told each other stories of love and adventure. Thus they passed their days happily. Then one day the English soldier died suddenly.

दोनों मित्र अपने दिन एक-साथ बिताया करते थे। वे प्रातः और सायं घुड़सवारी करने के लिए जाया करते थे। वे एक-दूसरे को प्यार और साहस की कहानियां सुनाया करते। इस तरह उन्होंने अपने दिन प्रसन्नतापूर्वक बिताए। फिर एक दिन अंग्रेज़ सैनिक की अचानक मृत्यु हो गई।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

Question 6.
Why was Pertab Singh asked to send a sweeper when the Englishman died ?
Answer:
Four men were needed to carry the Englishman’s bier. But in Jodhpore, they could find only three Englishmen. No one from the Hindu castes was supposed to carry the bier of a non-Hindu. So Pertab Singh was asked to send a sweeper. A sweeper has no caste to lose.

अंग्रेज़ आदमी की अरथी उठाने के लिए चार आदमियों की ज़रूरत थी। किन्तु जोधपुर में वे केवल तीन अंग्रेज़ ही ढूँढ पाये। हिन्दू जातियों में से कोई भी ऐसे आदमी की अरथी उठाने को तैयार नहीं होना था जो हिन्दू न हो। इसलिए प्रताब सिंह से कहा गया कि वह एक मेहतर को भेज दे। एक मेहतर की कोई जाति नहीं होती जिसे वह खो बैठे।

Question 7.
What was the problem that arose when the Englishman died ?
Answer:
Four men were needed to carry the Englishman’s bier. But in Jodhpore, they could find only three Englishmen. No one from the Hindu castes was supposed to carry the bier of a non-Hindu. Thus a problem arose to find the fourth bearer.

अंग्रेज़ की अरथी को उठाने के लिए चार आदमियों की ज़रूरत थी। किन्तु जोधपुर में वे केवल तीन अंग्रेज़ ही ढूँढ पाये। हिन्दू जातियों में से कोई भी ऐसे आदमी की अरथी उठाने को तैयार नहीं होना था जो हिन्दू न हो। इसलिए चौथे उठाने वाले को ढूंढने की समस्या पैदा हो गई।

Question 8.
What, according to the priests, had Pertab Singh lost ? Why?
Answer:
The priests said that Pertab Singh had lost his caste. He had carried the bier of a foreigner. Religion did not allow this. Pertab Singh had defied religion. He had made himself impure and thus lost his caste. However, Pertab Singh did not care what the priests said.

पुरोहितों ने कहा कि प्रताब सिंह अपनी जाति खो चुका था। उसने एक विदेशी की अरथी को उठाया था। धर्म इस की इजाजत नहीं देता था। प्रताब सिंह ने धर्म का उल्लंघन किया था। उसने स्वयं को अपवित्र बना लिया था और इस तरह अपनी जाति खो बैठा था। किन्तु प्रताब सिंह ने उस बात की परवाह न की जो पुरोहितों ने कही।

Objective Type Questions

Question 1.
Sir Pertab Singh lived in …………… House.
(i) Red-rose
(ii) Black-rose
(iii) Rose-red
(iv) Rose-blood.
Answer:
(iii) Rose-red

Question 2.
Sir Pertab Singh’s friend was ……………. soldier.
(i) an Indian
(ii) a Chinese
(iii) an English
(iv) a Pakistani.
Answer:
(iii) an English

Question 3.
According to the priests, Pertab Singh lost his caste forever. (True False)
Answer:
True.

Answer each of the following in one word / phrase / sentence :

Question 1.
Who wrote the poem, ‘A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh’ ?
Answer:
Sir Henry Newbolt.

Question 2.
What was Sir Pertab Singh’s house called ?
Answer:
It was called Rose-red House.

Question 3.
Who came forward to carry the bier of Pertab’s English friend ?
Answer:
Sir Pertab Singh himself.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

Question 4.
What did the Brahmins tell Sir Pertab Singh when he carried his English friend’s bier ?
Answer:
They told Pertab Singh that he had lost his caste.

Question 5.
What does the poem, ‘A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh’ bring out ?
Answer:
It brings out the folly of caste system.

Complete the following :

1. Sir Pertab Singh was the king of ……
2. ….. is the only true caste.
3. Sir Pertab Singh did not care about the warning of the …….
Answer:
1. Jodhpore
2. Humanity
3. priests.

Write True or False against each statement:

1. Sir Pertab Singh did not believe in the caste system.
2. Pertab’s friend was a German soldier.
3. No one is high or low by caste.
Answer:
1. True
2. False
3. True.

Choose the correct option for each of the following :

Question 1.
Sir Pertab Singh liked the English soldier because he looked every inch a …………
(a) lover
(b) soldier
(c) traitor
(d) joker.
Answer:
(b) soldier

Question 2.
The two comrades told each other the stories of ………
(a) saints and prophets
(b) kings and knights
(c) gods and goddesses
(d) love and adventure.
Answer:
(d) love and adventure.

Reading Comprehension

(1) In the first year of him that first
Was Emperor and King,
A rider came to the Rose-red House,
The House of Pertab Singh.

1. Name the poem and the poet.
2. Who came to Pertab Singh’s house ?
3. What was the house called ?
4. How long had Pertab Singh been the King ?
Answer:
1. The name of the poem is ‘A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh’. The poet is Sir Henry
2. A young English rider came to Pertab Singh’s house.
3. The house was called Rose-red House.
4. He was yet in the first year of his rule

(2) Beneath the morning stars they rode,
Beneath the evening sun,
And their blood sang to them as they rode
That all good wars are one.

1. Who were the riders ?
2. How did they feel while riding together ?
3. How did they feel about wars ?
4. How long did the two continue riding together ?
Answer:
1. The two riders were Pertab Singh and an English soldier.
2. They felt very brave and happy.
3. They felt that all good wars are one.
4. They kept riding from early dawn till it was evening.

(3) So ran their joy the allotted days,
Till at the last day’s end
The shadow stilled the Rose-red House
And the heart of Pertab’s friend.

1. Who was Pertab’s friend ?
2. What happened to the friend ?
3. How did the two feel while living together ?
4. Explain : “The shadow stilled the Rose-red House.?
Answers ·
1. Pertab’s friend was an English soldier.
2. The friend died suddenly.
3. They felt very happy while living together.
4. Pertab’s heart was filled with sorrow over his friend’s death. The whole palace was covered in the shadow of grief.

(4) There were three of his race and creed,
Three only and no more :
They could not find to bear the dead
A fourth in all Jodhpore.
‘O Maharaj, of your good grace
Send us a sweeper here;
A sweeper has no caste to lose
Even by an alien bier.’

1. “There were three of his race and creed. Which race has been mentioned here ?
2. What could they not find in all Jodhpore ?
3. What did they request the king to do ?
Answers
1. The race and creed of the Englishman has been mentioned here.
2. They could not find a fourth one of the English race and creed in all Jodhpore to carry the bier of a foreigner:
3. They requested the king to send a sweeper to carry the bier of a foreigner.

(5) What need, what need ?’ said Pertab Singh,
And bowed his princely head.
‘I have no caste, for I myself
Am bearing forth the dead.’

1. What need does Pertab Singh refer to ?
2. Who came forward to carry the bier ?
3. Whose bier was it ?
4. Why did Pertab Singh say, “I have no caste.” ?
Answer:
1. It was the need of a fourth person to carry the bier.
2. Pertab Singh himself came forward to carry the bier.
3. It was the bier of an English soldier who was Pertab Singh’s friend.
4. He said this because he did not believe in the caste system

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

(6) “God only knows,’ said Pertab Singh,
“That which I lose today :
And without me no hand of man,
Shall bear my friend away.’

1. Name the poem and the poet.
2. How did he feel over this loss ?
3. What did he decide to do ?
4. What did Pertab Singh say he had lost ?
Answer:
1. The name of the poem is ‘A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh’. The poet is Sir Henry Newbolt.
2. He felt very unhappy over the loss.
3. He decided to carry his friend’s bier himself.
4. He said he had lost a very dear friend.

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Poem Summary in English

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Introduction:
Now there arose a problem. There were only three Englishmen in all Jodhpore. They could not find a fourth one to carry the dead man’s bier. Religion did not allow a Hindu to carry the dead body of a foreigner. So, the king was requested to send a sweeper. But the king himself came forward to carry his friend’s dead body to the grave. The king was warned that he would lose his caste by doing so.

Sir Pertab Singh paid no heed to it. Next morning the Brahmins came to Pertab Singh. They informed him that he had been declared an outcaste. Pertab Singh angrily told the Brahmins that there was a caste higher than any other caste in the world. It was the caste of a true soldier. The king belonged to this caste and had no fear of losing it.

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Summary in English:

This ballad shows the folly of the Hindu caste system. Sir Pertab Singh was the king of Jodhpore. It was the first year of his rule when a rider came to his palace. This rider was a young Englishman. He was every inch a soldier. On seeing him Pertab’s heart lit up with joy. The two became fast friends.

Now the two friends spent most of their time together. They told each other their stories of love and adventure. Thus they passed their days joyfully. But unfortunately, after some days, Pertab’s friend died all of a sudden. The king’s heart was filled with sorrow. The shadow of grief spread over his palace.

Next morning the Englishman’s dead body was placed in a coffin. It was to be carried to the place of burial. But there arose a problem. There were only three men of his race and creed in all Jodhpore. They could not find a fourth one to carry the bier. Religion did not allow a Hindu to carry the bier of a foreigner. So they requested the king to send a sweeper. A sweeper, they said, had no caste to lose.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

But the king himself came forward to carry the bier of his friend. People were filled with surprise. They told the king that he would lose his caste if he did so. But the king paid no heed to what they said. No loss could be greater to him than the loss of his friend. Without caring for what the people said, he became the fourth pall-bearer. He carried the bier of his friend in the sight of all Jodhpore.

Next morning some Brahmins came to Pertab Singh. They said that a very fearful thing had happened. The king had lost his caste for what he had done. At this the king flew into a rage. He said that his caste was above the caste of any Brahmin or Rajput. It was immortal. It was wide as the world, free as the air, and pure as the pool of death. It was the caste of all noble hearts. It was the caste of a true soldier. Sir Pertab Singh had no fear of losing it.

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Poem Summary in Hindi

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Introduction:
यह गीत हिन्दू जाति-प्रथा की मूर्खता को नंगा करता है। सर प्रताब सिंह जोधपुर का राजा था। एक बार एक घुड़सवार उसके महल में आया। वह घुड़सवार एक अंग्रेज़ था। वह पूर्ण रूप से एक सैनिक प्रतीत होता था। दोनों पक्के मित्र बन गए। अब वे अपना अधिकतर समय इकट्ठे ही बिताया करते थे। एक दिन सर प्रताब सिंह के मित्र की अचानक मृत्यु हो गई। राजा का दिल दुःख से भर गया। अब एक समस्या पैदा हो गई। पूरे जोधपुर में केवल तीन अंग्रेज़ व्यक्ति थे। उन्हें मृत व्यक्ति की अरथी उठाने के लिए चौथा आदमी न मिल सका।

धर्म एक हिन्दू को इजाजत नहीं देता था कि वह किसी विदेशी के मृत शरीर को उठाकर ले जाए। इसलिए राजा से प्रार्थना की गई कि वह किसी मेहतर को भेज दे। किन्तु अपने मित्र के शव को उठा कर कब्र तक ले जाने के लिए राजा स्वयं आ गया। राजा को चेतावनी दी गई कि ऐसा करने से वह अपनी जाति खो बैठेगा। सर प्रताब सिंह ने इसकी ओर कोई ध्यान न दिया। अगली प्रातः ब्राह्मण प्रताब सिंह के पास आए। उन्होंने उसे सूचित किया कि उसे जाति में से निकाल दिया गया था। प्रताब सिंह ने क्रोधपूर्वक ब्राह्मणों से कहा कि एक जाति ऐसी थी जो प्रत्येक अन्य जाति से ऊंची थी। यह एक सच्चे सैनिक की जाति थी। राजा इसी जाति से सम्बन्ध रखता था तथा इसे खोने का उसे कोई भय नहीं था।

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Summary in Hindi:

कविता का विस्तृत सार यह गीत हिन्दू जाति-प्रथा की मूर्खता को स्पष्ट करता है। सर प्रताब सिंह जोधपुर का राजा था। उसके राज्यकाल का पहला वर्ष था जब एक घुड़सवार उसके महल में आया। यह घुड़सवार एक युवा अंग्रेज़ था। वह पूरी तरह से एक सैनिक प्रतीत हो रहा था। उसे देखकर प्रताब का दिल खुशी से भर गया। दोनों पक्के मित्र बन गए। – दोनों मित्र अब अपना अधिकतर समय इकट्ठे ही गुजारा करते थे। वे एक-दूसरे को अपने प्यार और पराक्रम की कहानियां सुनाया करते थे। इस प्रकार वे अपने दिन खुशी-खुशी बिताते चले गए। किन्तु दुर्भाग्यवश कुछ दिनों के पश्चात् प्रताब के मित्र की अचानक मृत्यु हो गई। राजा का दिल दुःख से भर गया। दुःख की परछाईं महल के ऊपर छा गई।

अगली प्रातः उस अंग्रेज़ के शव को एक ताबूत में रख दिया गया। इसे दफनाने की जगह पर ले जाया जाना था। किन्तु एक समस्या पैदा हो गई। पूरे जोधपुर में उसकी जाति तथा धर्म के केवल तीन लोग थे। उन्हें अरथी उठाने के लिए चौथा व्यक्ति न मिल सका। धर्म एक हिन्दू को इस बात की इजाजत नहीं देता था कि वह किसी विदेशी की अरथी को उठाए। इसलिए उन्होंने राजा से प्रार्थना की कि वह किसी मेहतर को भेज दे। उन्होंने कहा कि एक मेहतर की कोई जाति नहीं होती थी जिसे वह खो सकता हो।

किन्तु राजा अपने मित्र की अरथी को उठाकर ले जाने के लिए स्वयं आगे आया। लोग हैरानी से भर गए। उन्होंने राजा से कहा कि वह अपनी जाति खो बैठेगा यदि उसने ऐसा किया। किन्तु राजा ने उनके द्वारा कही गई बात की तरफ कोई ध्यान न दिया। अपने मित्र की हानि (मृत्यु) से बड़ी हानि उसके लिए कोई अन्य नहीं हो सकती थी। इस बात की कोई परवाह किए बिना कि लोग क्या कह रहे थे वह अरथी उठाने वाला चौथा व्यक्ति बन गया। वह पूरे जोधपुर की आंखों के सामने अपने मित्र की अरथी को उठा कर ले गया।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

अगली प्रातः कुछ ब्राह्मण प्रताब सिंह के पास आए। उन्होंने उसे बतलाया कि एक बहुत भयानक बात हो गई थी। राजा ने जो किया था उसके कारण वह अपनी जाति खो बैठा था। यह सुनकर राजा क्रोध से भर गया। उसने कहा कि उसकी जाति किसी ब्राह्मण या राजपूत की जाति से अधिक ऊंची थी। यह कभी न मिट सकने वाली थी। यह संसार जितनी विशाल, पवन जितनी स्वतन्त्र और मृत्यु के सरोवर जितनी पवित्र थी। यह सभी सच्चे दिल वाले व्यक्तियों की जाति थी। सर प्रताब सिंह को इसके खो जाने का कोई भय नहीं था।

A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh Poem Translation in Hindi

(1) (Lines 1-4)
In the first year of him that first
Was Emperor and King,
A rider came to the Rose-red House,
The House of Pertab Singh.

अनुवाद-उसे सम्राट् तथा राजा बने हुए अभी पहला ही वर्ष चल रहा था जब एक घुड़सवार प्रताब सिंह के लाल-गुलाबी महल में आया।

(2) (Lines 5 – 8)
Young he was and an Englishman,
And a soldier, hilt and heel,
And he struck fire in Pertab’s heart
As the steel strikes on steel.

अनुवाद-वह घुड़सवार जवान था तथा एक अंग्रेज़ था। वह सिर से पांव तक पूरा सिपाही था। उसे देखकर प्रताब सिंह के दिल से ऐसी ज्वाला उठी जो फौलाद के साथ फौलाद के टकराने पर निकलती है।

(3) (Lines 9-12)
Beneath the morning stars they rode,
Beneath the evening sun,
And their blood sang to them as they rode
That all good wars are one.

अनुवाद-वे प्रातःकाल के तारों की छांव में इकट्ठे घुड़सवारी किया करते। सायंकाल को सूर्य डूबने के समय भी वे इकटे घुड़सवारी किया करते तथा जब वे घुड़सवारी कर रहे होते तो उन्हें अपने खून में से यही संगीत सुनाई देता कि भले कामों के लिए लड़ी जाने वाली सभी लड़ाइयां एक जैसी होती हैं।

(4) (Lines 13-16)
They told their tales of the love of women,
Their tales of East and West,
But their blood sang that of all their loves
They loved a soldier best.

अनुवाद-वे एक-दूसरे को अपने-अपने प्यार की कहानियां सुनाते। वे पूर्व के देशों की तथा पश्चिम के देशों की कहानियां सुनाते। किन्तु उनके खून में से यही संगीतमय आवाजें आतीं कि वे सबसे अधिक एक सैनिक से ही प्यार करते थे।

(5) (Lines 17-20)
So ran their joy the allotted days,
Till at the last day’s end
The shadow stilled the Rose-red House
And the heart of Pertab’s friend.

अनुवाद-इस प्रकार उनका प्रसन्नतापूर्ण जीवन निश्चित दिनों तक चलता रहा। अन्त में मौत की परछाईं ने लाल-गुलाबी (पत्थर के बने हुए) महल को सुला दिया तथा प्रताब के मित्र के दिल को भी (अर्थात् प्रताब के उस अंग्रेज़ मित्र की मृत्यु हो गई)।

(6) (Lines 21-24)
When morning came, in narrow chest,
The soldier’s face they hid,
And over his fast-dreaming eyes
Shut down the narrow lid.

अनुवाद-जब प्रातः हुई तो उन्होंने एक तंग बक्से (ताबूत) में उस सैनिक के चेहरे को छिपा दिया तथा उसकी गहरी स्वप्नों से भरी आँखों से ऊपर ताबूत के तंग ढक्कन को बन्द कर दिया।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

(7) (Lines 25-28)
Three were there of his race and creed,
Three only and no more :
They could not find to bear the dead
A fourth in all Jodhpore.

अनुवाद-वहां उस अंग्रेज़ की अपनी कौम और जाति के तीन व्यक्ति थे। वे केवल तीन ही थे और कोई नहीं था। अरथी को उठाने के लिए पूरे जोधपुर में उन्हें कोई चौथा व्यक्ति न मिल सका।

(8) (Lines 29-32)
‘O Maharaj, of your good grace
Send us a sweeper here;
A sweeper has no caste to lose
Even by an alien bier.’

अनुवाद-“ओ महाराज, आपकी बड़ी कृपा होगी, यदि आप हमारे लिए यहां एक मेहतर भेज दें। एक मेहतर की जाति भ्रष्ट नहीं हो सकती है यद्यपि वह किसी विदेशी की (अथवा किसी अन्य जाति के व्यक्ति की) अरथी को भी कन्धा लगा दे।”

(9) (Lines 33-36)
‘What need, What need ?’ said Pertab Singh,
And bowed his princely head.
‘I have no caste, for I myself
Am bearing forth the dead.’

अनुवाद-“क्या ज़रूरत है, क्या ज़रूरत है ?” प्रताब सिंह ने कहा। यह कहते हुए उसने अपना शाही सिर झुकाया तथा फिर कहा, “मेरी कोई जाति नहीं है, क्योंकि मैं स्वयं मृतक को कन्धा देने जा रहा हूं।”

(10) (Lines 37-40)
O Maharaj, O passionate heart,
Be wise, bethink you yet :
That which you lose today is lost
Till the last sun shall set.’

अनुवाद-“ओ महाराज, ओ दया के सागर, बुद्धि से काम लीजिए। अभी भी आप विचार कर लीजिए। जो आप आज गंवा बैठेंगे वह अन्तिम सूर्य के डूबने तक (अर्थात् संसार के रहने तक) खो बैठेंगे।”

(11) (Lines 41-44)
‘God only knows,’ said Pertab Singh,
That which I lose today :
And without me no hand of man
Shall bear my friend away.

अनुवाद-प्रताब सिंह ने कहा, “वह तो केवल ईश्वर ही जानता है कि मैं आज क्या गंवा बैठा हूँ। तथा मेरे अतिरिक्त किसी भी अन्य व्यक्ति का हाथ मेरे मित्र (की अरथी) को उठा कर नहीं ले जाएगा।”

(12) (Lines 45-48)
Stately and slow and shoulder-high
In the sight of all Jodhpore,
The dead went down, by the rose-red steps
Upheld by bearers four.

अनुवाद-पूरे जोधपुर की आंखों के सामने शाही ढंग से धीरे-धीरे कन्धों पर उठाए गए मृत शरीर को लालगुलाबी (पत्थर की बनी) सीढ़ियों के नीचे ले जाया गया, जिसे चार व्यक्तियों ने उठाया हुआ था।

(13) (Lines 49-52)
When dawn relit the lamp of grief
Within the burning East
There came a word to Pertab Singh,
The soft word of a priest.

अनुवाद-जब अगली प्रातः होने पर जलती हुई पूर्व दिशा में सूर्य रूपी दुःख का दीपक फिर से चमकने लगा तो प्रताब सिंह को एक पुजारी की तरफ से नम्रतापूर्ण सन्देश प्राप्त हुआ।

(14) (Lines 53-56)
He woke, and even as he woke
He went forth all in white,
And saw the Brahmins bowing there
In the hard morning light.

अनुवाद-वह जाग उठा तथा जागते ही पूरे सफ़ेद वस्त्र पहने हुए बाहर आया। वहां उसने प्रातः की दुःखदायक रोशनी में ब्राह्मणों को सिर झुकाए हुए खड़े देखा।

(15) (Lines 57-60)
‘Alas ! O Maharaj, alas!
O noble Pertab Singh
For here in Jodhpore yesterday
Befell a fearful thing.

अनुवाद-“बहुत शोक की बात है ! ओ महाराज, बहुत शोक की बात है ! ओ भली आत्मा वाले प्रताब सिंह जी ! क्योंकि कल यहां जोधपुर में बहुत भयानक बात हो गई।”

(16) (Lines 61-64)
o here in Jodhpore yesterday
A fearful thing befell.’
‘A fearful thing,’ said Pertab Singh,
God and my heart know well.

अनुवाद-“हां, कल यहां जोधपुर में एक बहुत भयानक बात हो गई।” “हां, एक भयानक बात हो गई है,” प्रताब सिंह ने कहा, “यह तो ईश्वर और मेरा दिल अच्छी तरह से जानते हैं।”

(17) (Lines 65-68)
I lost a friend.’ ‘More fearful yet !
When down these steps you passed
In sight of all Jodhpore you lost
O Maharaj ! – your caste.

अनुवाद-“मैं एक मित्र खो बैठा हूँ।” “इससे भी अधिक भयानक बात हो गई है। जब पूरे जोधपुर की नज़रों के सामने इन सीढ़ियों से नीचे को आप चलकर गए थे, तब ओ महाराज, आप अपनी जाति खो बैठे थे।”

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 3 A Ballad of Sir Pertab Singh

(18) (Lines 69 – 72)
Then leapt the light in Pertab’s eyes
As the flame leaps in smoke,
“Thou priest ! thy soul hath never known
The word thy lips have spoke.

अनुवाद-तब प्रताब सिंह की आंखों में क्रोध की ज्वाला ऐसे चमक उठी जैसे धुएं में से आग चमक उठती है। “अरे पुजारी ! तुम्हारी आत्मा उन शब्दों के अर्थ को कभी समझ नहीं सकती है जो तुम्हारे होठों में से निकल रहे हैं।”

(19) (Lines 73-76)
‘My caste ! Know you there is a caste
Above my caste or thine,
Brahmin and Rajput are but dust
To that immortal line :

अनुवाद-“तुम मेरी जाति की बात करते हो ! तुम जान लो कि एक जाति ऐसी भी है जो मेरी जाति से तथा तुम्हारी जाति से भी ऊंची है। उस कभी न मिटने वाली जाति के सामने किसी ब्राह्मण अथवा राजपूत की जाति मात्र धूलि समान है।”

(20) (Lines 77—80)
“Wide as the world, free as the air,
Pure as the pool of death
The caste of all Earth’s noble hearts
Is the right soldier’s faith.

अनुवाद-“एक सच्चे सैनिक की जाति संसार जितनी विशाल, वायु जितनी स्वतन्त्र तथा मृत्यु के सरोवर के समान पवित्र होती है। तथा यह पूरी धरती के सज्जन पुरुषों की जाति होती है।”

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 10 State and Government

Punjab State Board PSEB 11th Class Political Science Book Solutions Chapter 10 State and Government Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 11 Political Science Chapter 10 State and Government

Long Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Bring out the distinction between the state and the government.
Answer:
State is the main subject of Political Science. Without state development of personality of the individual is not possible. State is a community of persons, permanently occupying a definite territory, having a government which is sovereign in internal and external matters. There are four essential elements population, definite territory, government and sovereignty. Without these four elements there can be no state.
Government is one of the elements of the states. State does not perform any functions. Its functions are performed by the government. The government performs this function by framing laws. According to Garner “Government is the collective name for the agency magistracy or organisation through which the will of the state is formulated, expressed and realised.” We in our daily life use the word state for government and government for i state. But distinction exists between state and government.

Distinction between State and Government:
In ancient times no distinction was made between state and government. King of France, Louis XIV used to say, ‘I am the state.’ He could claim that he was the government as he was the absolute monarch and all governmental authority was vested in him. But he could not claim himself to be the state as the state is altogether a different concept.

Similarly Stuart King of England tried to prove their absolutism never made a distinction between state and government. Even Hobbes has not made any distinction between state and government. Locke was the first writer who made a distinction between state and government. But even today masses do not consider any distinction between the two. Laski has pointed out that “the state is for the purposes of practical administration, the government.”

Following are the distinctions between State and Government : s 1. Government is a Part of State. Government is a part of the state and not itself a state. There are four elements of the state-population, fixed territory, government and sovereignty. Government is only one of the . elements which constitute the i state. No doubt without government there can be no state but government itself cannot be a state.

2. Government is the Agent of the State:
Government is the agent of the state. Just as it is the function of the’agent to carry out the will of the owners of his company, similarly aim of the government is to fulfil the wishes of the state. According to Laski, “It exists to carry out the purpose of the state. . It is not itself the supreme coercive power. It is simply the mechanism of administration which gives effect to the purposes of that power.

3. State is Abstract, Government is Concrete:
State is an idea. It has no form. It can be imagined only but we cannot see the abstract state. We can see the population and territory but not the state. But on the other hand government is a concrete institution. For example, we can think of Indian state but we cannot see it whereas we can see Indian government.

4. Membership of the State is compulsory, but not of Government:
Membership of the state is compulsory. Every citizen must be the member of one or the other state but every person cannot be the member of a government even if he so desires. The membership of a state is not voluntary. A man becomes a citizen of that state where he is bom, he cannot refuse to become a citizen of that state.

But every man is not a member of the Government and its membership is also not compulsory. To become a member of a government depends upon the will of the individual. To be a member of the government one must possess certain necessary qualifications and the persons fulfilling those alone can become the members of the government. The individual can leave the membership of the government at any time but no citizen can leave the membership of the state when he so likes.

5. Territory is essential for State, but not for Government:
Fixed territory is an essential element of the state. Without definite territory there can be no state. But definite territory is not essential for the government. Government is an institution which can be established in a closed room. During Second World War when Germany conquered many European countries then the governments of these countries were run in other countries. For example, government of France was run from England. But there cannot be a state without a definite territory.

6. State possesses Sovereignty but government does not posssess the same:
Sovereignty is an essential element of the state. Without sovereignty there can be no state. Before 1947 India was under the British empire and hence India was not a state. But sovereignty is not with the government. The powers enjoyed by the government are conferred upon it by the state. Powers of the state are unlimited whereas powers of the government are limited. Generally government derives its powers from the constitution, just in India. If government exercises its power in a corrupt manner, it can be changed.

7. State is peramanent, government is temporary:
State is permanent, though it is not immortal. A state remains state so long as it has four essential elements— population, definite territory, government and sovereignty. State ends when it loses sovereignty. But after gaining sovereignty it becomes state again. When Hitler conquered Austria, Poland etc. they did not remain states but after the war when they gained sovereignty they became states. But government is changeable.

Governments come and go but states continue for ever. If today, in one state there is monarchy, tomorrow there can be a democratic government. Before March, 1977, in India there was a Congress government but in the general election Congress Was defeated and Janata Party came into power but in the general election of 1980, Congress (I) gained a thumping majority in the Parliament.

8. Government does not include the whole population of the state:
Population is an essential element of the state. All the persons living within a territory of a state are included in the population of a state. But in the government only those persons are included who are working in different organs of the government, e.g., members of the parliament, members of the executive and judges of the judiciary etc. In other words in the population of the government only those persons are included who are drawing salary from the treasury.

9. State without government is impossible but government without state is possible:
Government is an essential attribute of the state and without government there can be no state. But it is not essential that there must be a state for the existence of a government. A government may exist without a state. During Second World War government of France was in England but there was no France state as France was conquered by Hitler.

10. Difference of Nature:
State is a result of growth. It is a natural institution. But government is an artificial institution which is formed by men. Thus from nature point of view state is natural whereas government is artificial.

11. States are the same everywhere, but Governments are different:
All states are essentially alike. Every large or small state has the same four elements-population, definite territory, Government and sovereignty. India, Pakistan, Japan, England, America, Russia, China etc., are having these four elements. But there are various forms of governments. Forms of government vary from state to state and from time to time. In India, Japan, England, Bangladesh etc. there is a parliamentary government but in U.S.A., there is a presidential government. In Communist China, Vietnam, Cuba, North Korea etc. there is a dictatorship of the Communist Party.

12. People can resist the Government, not the State:
People cannot oppose the state because whole population is included in the state. How can the population oppose themselves? Will of the state is expressed through government. All functions of the state are performed by the government. If a government does not work for the welfare of the people and enact such laws which are not in the interests of the masses, then masses have a right to oppose such a government and even government can be changed by peaceful or revolutionary methods.

Conclusion:
On the basis of above discussion we can say that differences exist between state and government. American Supreme Court has made a distinction between state and government in one of its decisions : “The state itself is an ideal personal, intangible, invisible, immutable. The government is an agent and within the spare of the agency a perfect representative, but outside of that it is lawless usurpation.” But state and government cannot exist without each other.

Both are different entities and though everything is done in the name of the state yet it is done by the government. According to Laski, “All institutions act through persons, the power they exercise cannot operate in any other fashion. The state, therefore, needs a body of men who operate in its name, supreme coercive authority which it disposes and this body of men is what we term the government of the state.”

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 10 State and Government

Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
What do you mean by Government?
Answer:
There are four essential elements of a state-population, definite territory, government and sovereignty. Without these four elements there can be no state.

Government is one of the elements of the state. State does not perform any functions. Its functions are performed by the government. The government formulates and expresses the will of the state. The government performs this function by framing laws. According to Garner, “ Government is the collective name for the agency magistracy or organisation through which the will of the state is formulated, expressed and realised.”

Question 2.
Distinguish between state and government.
Answer:

  • Government is a part of the state and not itself a state.
  • Membership of the state is compulsory, but not of government.
  • Fixed territory is an essestial element of the state. But definite territory is not essestial for the government.
  • State possesses sovereignty but government does not possess the same.

Very Short Answer Type Questions

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 10 State and Government

Question 1.
What do you mean by Government?
Answer:
Government is one of the elements of the state. State does not perform any functions. Its functions are performed by the government. The government formulates and expresses the will of the state. The government performs this function by framing laws.

Question 2.
Distinguish between state and government.
Answer:

  • Government is a part of the state and not itself a state.
  • Membership of the state is compulsory, but not of government.

One Word to One Sentence Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Define the term Government.
Answer:
According to Garner- “Government is the collective name for the agency magistracy or organisation through which the will of the state is formulated expressed and realised.”

Question 2.
Mention any one difference between state and Government.
Answer:
Territory is essential for State, but not for Government.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 10 State and Government

Fill in the blanks

1. Government is one of the elements of the
Answer:
State

2. King of France used to say , “I am the state.”
Answer:
Louis XIV

3. State is but Government is concrete.
Answer:
Abstract.

True or False Statement

1. The government formulates and expresses the will of the state.
Answer:
True.

2. State is a part of Government.
Answer:
False

3. State is parmanent, but Government is temporary.
Answer:
True.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 10 State and Government

Choose The Correct Answer

Question 1.
What is the difference between state and government?
(A) State is more comprehensive than Government
(B) Government is an agent of the state
(C) State is abstract, Government is concrete
(D) All of the Above.
Answer:
(D) All of the Above.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Punjab State Board PSEB 11th Class Political Science Book Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 11 Political Science Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Long Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
Define Society. Explain the characteristics of Society.
Answer:
Man is by nature a social animal and he cannot live without a society. A man who does not five in a society is either a beast or a God.
Meaning and Definitions of Society:
Whenever a number of people unite together to carry out some definite purpose, they make a society. It is the most general form of human organization. But it is to be noted that the individuals who wander aimlessly in the street or gather in a picture-house without any common purpose among them do not constitute a society. In simple words common purpose and interest is the basis for the formation of any society.

Different writers have given different definitions of society:

  1. According to Dr. Jenks, “The term society means harmonious or at least peaceful relationship.”
  2. According to Ginsberg, “A society is the collection of individuals united by certain relation of modes of behaviour which mark them from others, who do not enter into those relations or who differ from them in behaviour.”
  3. According to Maclver, “Society includes every willed relationship of man to man.”
  4. According to Summer and Keller, “Society is a group of human beings living in co¬operative efforts to win subsistance and perpetuate the species.”
  5. According to Wright, “It is not a group of people, it is the system or relationship that exists between individuals or groups.”
  6. According to Giddings, “Society is a group of individuals cooperating for the achievement of any objective of common interest or utility.”
  7. According to G.D.H. Cole, “Society is the complex of associations and institutions within the community.”
  8. According to Leacock, “Society suggests not political relations by which men are bound together, but the whole range of human relations and collective activities.”

On the basis of above definitions we may define society as a group of people, large or small, who are combined together for the achievement of some definite aim or common purpose or plan with common effort. For instance there exist many societies like the Royal Asiatic Society, the Scientific Society and the Historical Society etc. for the welfare of the people.

The society may be local like a cricket club or may be national like national trade union or even it may be international like Red Cross Society which maintains its branches in every part of the world. In the ancient times societies existed in a very simple form because the desires of the people were limited and few.

But, the modem society is complex in nature because of increased desires as a result of advancement of culture and civilization. Thus many associations and organizations may exist in one wide society. Hence in the true sense, society is an assemblage of such associations through which men develop their physical, mental and spiritual qualities for human welfare.

Characteristics Of Society:
1. A Group of Persons:
Society is a group of persons living and working together in a spirit of peace and harmony for the satisfaction of their common wants and the promotion of their common good. It is a group of human beings living together and working together to achieve a common purpose for a common good, through their joint efforts.

2. Common Aims:
Persons living in a society have common interests and common wants for the attainment of which they work together and live together. Societies as Aristotle said were formed for the sake of good life. But they are maintained afterwards for the sake of good life. Thus the aim of society is to promote the good life of the members. Common needs and common interests of the members of the society give them common activities which serve as a bond of unity among the members of society. Unity gives strength and solidarity to the group.

3. Mutual Cooperation:
The individual is dependent on the society for the various needs. His ideas and actions are coloured by the society in which he lives. He is what the society makes him. As life becomes more complex, the necessity of living in society grows more urgent. From the early childhood to full grown manhood, the individual needs society at every stage of his life. He cannot satisfy his material needs for food or shelter without the co-operation of others. He cannot solve the problem of security of protection by his isolated efforts. Hence a good and happy life is possible only through co-operation.

4. Voluntary Membership:
The membership of a state is compulsory while that of a society is voluntary. An individual may become the member of a society or may not or he may become the member of the more than one society. State and family are two natural associations of which an individual must be a member. But once he accepts the membership of a society he must abide by the rules and regulations of that society. .

5. Equality among Members of the Group:
All the members of society irrespective of caste, colour, creed and sex must enjoy equal rights. There should be no discrimination against any member of the society. No member should be above the rules of the society and no member should enjoy special privileges. Majority decisions should be final.

6. Loyalty to the Group:
Lack of discipline creates a confusion and chaos and so all the members of the group must show perfect loyalty to that group by thoroughly observing the rules of discipline. All the members should be loyal to the organisation. Strength, permanance and unity can be had in the organization only if all the members are thoroughly disciplined.

7. Aims of Society:
The society always aims at the development of the individual. It provides the individual with all those opportunities or facilities with which he can develop his powers and faculties to the fullest extent. Moreover, the society aims at general welfare and not merely looks to the benefit of a particular section of people. The ultimate aim of society consists in the development of national life, cultural and ideal as constrasted with individual personality.

8. Fulfilment of Social Instinct:
According to Aristotle, “Man is a social animal.’ Man wants to live in society for the fulfilment of his social instinct. He cannot lead life in isolation. He possesses an instinct of gregariousness. If there is anybody who wants to lead an isolated life, he is either a god or a beast. Man’s social instinct is satisfied only if he leads a group life.

Conclusion:
We can conclude in the end that the proper progress of life is impossible without society. A man can develop his personality and be at his best only in society. It is because man lives in society that he proudly calls himself, “The top and crown of all creation.” Society enables man to live happily.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 2.
Define State and discuss its essential elements.
Or
Discuss the essential elements of a State.
Answer:
State is the main subject of Political Science, but the term ‘State’ is used in many ways due to which it is difficult for a common man to understand the proper meaning of the word ‘State’. Generally distinction is not made between State, Society and Nation and ordinarily the people use the word State for society, country, nation, government etc. But from Political Science point of view, it is not correct because all these terms have different meanings.

Many times the word State is used for the federating units and for the federation. For example, the word ‘State’ is used for United States of America as well as the units of U.S.A. Similarly the word ‘State’ is used for India and for its units. Punjab, Bengal, Haryana, U.P., M.P. etc. are often called states but in fact these are not states. For a student of Political Science it is essential to know the meaning of term ‘State’.

Etymology of the word State:
The word ‘State’ is derived from the Latin word ‘Status’. The term ‘Status’ means social status of a man. In ancient times, no distinctioin was made between state and society. Hence the word ‘state’ was used to connote social status. But gradually its meaning changed and during the time of Cicero it was used for the status of the whole society.

In modern sense this term was used for first of all by Machiavelli, a great political scientist of Italy, in the book ‘The Prince’. In ‘The Prince’ Maehiavelli writes “All the powers which have had and have authority over men are states (state) and are either monarchies or republics.” Explaining the importance of the word ‘State’ as used by Machiavelli, Sir Earnest Barker writes, “The word ‘State’ when it came into use in England during the sixteenth century, brought with it from Italy the idea of a high ‘State’ or stateliness vested in some one person or some body of persons.”

Definition of State. According to Garner, there are as many definitions of the state as much is the number of writers. Different writers have given definitions from their own point of view. Some writers on the basis of source, some on the basis of elements, some on the basis of the origin of the state and some on the basis of aims of the state has defined the word ‘State’.

1. According to Aristotle, “State is a union of families and villages having for its end a perfect and self-sufficing life by which we mean happy and honourable life.” But Aristotle’s definition cannot be used in modem times as Aristotle has not made any distinction between state and society. Moreover, Aristotle’s definition has not mentioned territory and sovereignty.

2. According to Bluntschli, “State is politically organised people of a definite territory.”

3. According to Oppenheim, “The State exists when people are settled in a country under its own sovereign Government.”

4. According to Laski, “The State is a territorial society divided into government and subjects claiming within its alloted physical area a supremacy over all other institutions.”

5. According to Woodrow Wilson, “The State is a people organised for law within a definite territory.”

6. According to Gamer, “The State, as a concept of Political Science and Public Law, is a community of persons, more less numerous, permanently occupying a defined portion of territory, independent or nearly so of external control, and possessing an organised government to which the great body of inhabitants render habitual obedience.”

7. According to Gilchrist, “The State is a concept of Political Science and exist when a number of people, living on a definite territory are unifed under a government which in internal matters is the organ for expressing their sovereignty, and in external matters is independent of other governments.”

8. According to Bodin, “The state is an association of families and their common possessions governed by Supreme Power and by reason.”

9. According to Burges, “The State is a particular portion of mankind viewed as an organised unit.” .

10. According to Maclver, “The state is an association which acting through law as promulgated by a government endowed to this end with corecive power maintains within a community territorially democrated the universal conditions of social order.”

Among all these definitions, Garner and Gilchrist’s definitions are considered the best one because in these definitions all the four elements i.e. population, territory, government and sovereignty are clearly mentioned.

Elements of State:
On the basis of different definitions of State, we can say that state is a group of people having sovereignty, living in a fixed territory under the control of an organised Government. This definition of ‘state is based on four elements: Population, Fixed territory, Government and Sovereignty. It is true that different writers have stressed different elements. Some have emphasised Population, Government and Sovereignty and others have stressed Population, Territory and Government. But modem writers agree with the fact that state has four elements and state can’t exist without any one of them.

These elements are given below:
1. Population
2. Fixed Territory
3. Government
4. Sovereignty.

1. Population:
Population is the main element of state. State is not a group of animals and birds. It is a political institution of human beings. Existence of State can’t be imagined without population. No fixed rules are there to fix the limit of population, but sufficient population is needed for the state. Ten to twenty people can’t make a State.

However, difference of opinions exist among the writers about number of persons in a state. According to Plato, the number of population in a ideal state should be 5040. But according to Aristotle the number of population should neither be too small nor too large, but large enough to be self-sufficing and small enough to be well governed.

In other words, according to Aristotle population of the state should not be 50-60 because with this number the state cannot become self-sufficient and at the same time it should not be ten lakhs because such a big population is not controlled properly. Rousseau was a supporter of direct democracy, hence he fixed the population of a state at ten thousand and remarked that larger the population of state, less and liberty of the people.

But in the present time it is not possible to fix the population of the state. Modem tendency is in favour of states with huge population. Population of Communist China is about 135 crores whereas that of India more than 130 crores. Population of Russia is about 20 crores, and that of U.S.A. 30 crores.

But on the other hand there are very small states like San Marino and Monaco which have population of about 25 thousand and 32 thousand respectively. There are also countries which have the population in lakhs. Luxemburge has the population of 4 lakhs whereas that of Switzerland is more than 70 lakhs. For some countries large population becomes a big problem.

For example for India large population is problem and government is emphasising family planning so that the growth of population is checked. But there are states which encourage the couples to produce more children. Before World War in Germany as in Italy state prizes to the couple were offered who produced children above a fixed number. But those who were issueless and the married they were heavily taxed by the state.

But seeing the population of the modern states, we can say that it is not only difficult but rather impossible to fix the population of the state. But still we agree with the view expressed by Aristotle that the population of the state should be large enough to be self-sufficing and well governed. In fact the population of the state should be to such an extent that the masses of that state lead a happy and prosperous life.

2. Fixed Territory:
Just as population is an essential element of the state, similarly fixed territory is an essential attribute of the state. But some scholars do not consider fixed territory as an essential element of the state. According to Jellinek before 19th century no writer had included territory in the definition of the term ‘State’. Kulber was the first writer who wrote and talked about the element of territory. Seeley and Duguit have not regarded fixed territory as an essential element of the state. In the words of Duguit, “Territory is not an indispensable element in the formation of state.”

But modern writers are not ready to accept this view. According to them, without fixed territory there can be no state. If masses are the soul of the state then fixed territory is the body of the state. According to Bluntschli, “As the state has its personal basis in the people, so it has its material basis in the land. The people do not become a state until they have acquired a territory.

So long as the people do not occupy a fixed territory, state cannot come into existence. Nomadic tribes and gypsies who wander from one place to another do not constitute a state because they do not have fixed territory. Before T948 Jews were scattered all over the world but they could not form a state because they were having no fixed territory. But when they started living on a fixed territory of Israel, then Israel became a state. In fact this element of the state made state separate from other associations.

Meaning of State Territory:
When we say that territory, is essential for the state then territory does not mean only a part of land but it means land, water and air. All the rivers, mountains, lakes and the mineral resources which are within the area of the state, are included in the territory. If sea is along the land then certain miles of that set is also a part of the territory of the state. The air¬space over the land is also included in the territory of the state.

Limits of State Territory:
Just as population cannot be fixed for the state, similarly no definite limit can be laid down about the territory. In ancient times the area of Greek City-states was very small. In those days the means of transportation and communication had not much developed. In those days small city-states were preferred for the successful running of direct democracy because all the people were personally acquainted with one another and hence could easily assemble together for some discussion or to take some decision. But modern age is a scientific age.

Means of transport and communication are fully developed and it is not difficult to administer a vast territory. Today, big states have been established. There are countries, like China, India, Russia, America etc. whose territory spreads into lakhs of squre miles. At present the largest territory is under the jurisdiction of Russia. The area of Russia is 17,075,000 square Kilometre while that of Canada is 9,976,139 square kilometre.

But there are also countries with small territories like Monaco, San Marino, Liechtenstein Vatican, Luxumberge etc. which have 1.95 sq Km., 61 sq Km., 160 sq Km., 0.44 sq Km., 2586 sq Km. areas of land respectively. But in internationalism all countries are equal. For example, in the United States all member-states are equal. In the modem age that state is considered more powerful and important which is having a large territory because in a large territory there are more natural resources.

3. Government:
The third essential element of a state is government. People inhabiting a certain territory cannot by themselves constitute a state, until and unless there is a political organisation of the people. Such a political organisation is the government. Government is that agency which formulates, expresses and fulfils the collective will of the people. Without the government masses cannot be organised. In the words of Garner, “Without a government the population would be an incoherent, unorganised anarchic mass with no means of collective action.”

In a state government can be of any type. In India, U.S.A., England, Switzerland, Canada, France, Germany etc. there is a democratic form of government while in China, Cuba, North Korea, etc. there is a dictatorship of the communist party. In Nepal there is a monarchy. In some states there is a parliamentary form of government, while in some there is a presidential government. In Japan, India, England etc. there is a parliamentary government, while in U.S.A. there is a presidential government.

In some state there is a federal government, while in some there is a unitary government. In U.S.A., Switzerland and India there is a federal government, while in Japan and in England there is a unitary government. It is immaterial which form of government exists in a state because government is changeable. With a change of government the status of state does not change. Whatever the form of government, every government has three main functions- law-making, enforcement of law and interpretation of law.

To perform, these three main functions there are three organs of the government,
(1) Legislature,
(2) Executive and
(3) Judiciary.
The government should be powerful enough to maintain law and order and should be able to defend its territory against any sort of foreign aggression.

4. Sovereignty:
The fourth essential element of the state is sovereignty. Population, fixed territory and government cannot constitute a state unless there is sovereignty also. The word sovereignty is derived from Latin word Superanus which means supreme. In this way sovereignty means the supreme power of the State. State possesses supreme right and no body can disobey the state. Due to sovereignty state is having full control over all the citizens and their associations. It also implies freedom from control from any outside authority. According to Laski, “It is the possession of Sovereignty that the state is distinguished from all other forms of human associations.” Sovereignty is of two types-Internal Sovereignty and External Sovereignty.

(i) Internal Sovereignty:
Internal sovereignty implies that the state has full control over all individuals, associations, institutions, and organisations within the state. No one can challenge its authority. If anyone disobeys the orders of the state, state has a right to punish him. The will of the state is supreme and must prevail under all circumstances and in all cases. Sovereignty cannot be divided among the different associations within the state.

Some people think that in a federal government internal sovereignty is divided between the Centre and the states. But this view is not correct. Internal sovereignty cannot be divided. In a federation, instead of sovereignty, powers are divided between the Centre and the units.

(ii) External Sovereignty:
External sovereignty implies that outside the state there is no institution of power which can compel the state to do certain things which state is not otherwise interested to do. A sovereign state is complete independent. It is absolutely free to determine its policy towards other states. If the policies of a country are controlled by other countries then it means that country is not state. Before 1947 India was under the control of Great Britain, hence it was not a state.

But India got independence on 15th August, 1947 and then India became a state. International treaties and agreements are made by the will of the state. To be a member of the United Nations is not against the external sovereignty of the state because to become a member of the United Nations is the will of the state concerned. The United Nations cannot be called a state, because it does not give sovereign powers to its members. Similarly Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh etc. are not states because they don’t possess sovereignty which is with India. Thus there are four essential elements of the state and if out of these four elements one element is missing, state cannot be established.

Can any element be called the most important one ? Ordinarily, this question is raised which of the four elements of the state is the most important. Every element in its own place is important and if one element is missing we cannot have a state. We cannot think of a state without population. Without fixed territory we cannot have a state. Peace and order cannot be established without a government.

Government formulates, expresses and fulfils the collective will of the state. Fourth element of the state i.e., sovereignty is very important because other three elements are available in other associations also but sovereignty is possessed only by the state. Sovereignty is the only element which draws a line of demarcation between the state and the other associations and hence state is the highest association.

That is why some writers give more importance to sovereignty than other elements. In the word of Gettell, “The state is not the people, nor the land, nor the government, but all of them and in addition the state must possess that unity which makes it a distinct and independent political unity.”

But the truth is that all the four elements are essential elements for the formation of the state. In the words of Gettell, “The absence of any one of these elements destroys the state, all must exist in combination.”

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 3.
Distinguish between State and Society.
Answer:
In ancient time no distinction was made between the State and the government. Aristotle has not made any distinction between state and society. For Plato and Aristotle state was society. It was due to the reason that at that time city-state was so small that it was very difficult to make a distinction between state and society. Greek city-states covered all aspects of human life-State was not only a political organisation, but it was also a religious, economic and cultural institution.

Hence it was natural not to make a distinction between state and society. In the modern age Hegel and Bosanquet have not made any distinction between state and society. Hitler and Mussolini have also not considered any distinction between state and society. Mussolini remarked, “Everything within a state, nothing outside the state and nothing against the state.”

But State and Society are not one. Maelver has rightly said that, “To identify the social with the political is to be guilty of the grossest of all confusions, which completely bars any understanding of either society or of the state.”
Following are the differences between State and Society:

1. Society is prior to the State:
According to Aristotle man is a social animal by nature and necessity. From the beginning man is living in the society. With the advent of man on earth, society began. But state was established at that time when political organisation with the society was established. Political organisation was established when men realised the necessity of peace and political consciousness was created among them. Thus state was established after the formation of a society.

2. Aim of Society is wider than that of State:
Aim of the society is wider, whereas the aim of the state is narrow. Aim of the society is development of all aspects of individual life. It is concerned not only with the political relations of man but with the whole range of human relations such as religious, educational, recreational, economic, social etc. But the state is mainly concerned with the political aspect of individual life.

3. Society is larger than the State:
Size of the state is small in comparison to the size of society. If we take a broader view of the word ‘Society’ then we can include whole humanity in it. For example members of Hindu Samaj are in many countries-India, Pakistan, Canada, Great Britain etc. Hence the size of society is larger than the State.

4. Definite territory is essential for the State, not for the Society:
Definite territory is an essential element of the state and without it there can be no state. But for a society definite territory is not essential. The group of people who wish to form a society may live in a particular country or may be scattered all over the world. Before the establishment of Israel, Jewish society was spread all over the world. Red Cross Society has its branches all over the world.

5. State is organised, Society can be organised as well as unorganised:
Political organisation is very essential for a State. Without political organisation (government) there can be no government. Government is an essential element of the state and will of the state is expressed through it. But society includes organised as well as unorganised communities.

When there was no state man lived in family and in tribes and these tribes wandered from place to place but still there was society though it was unorganised. With the establishment of government organisation came into society and with this state came into being.

6. State possesses sovereignty, Society does not:
Sovereignty is an essential element of the state. State has a power to issue orders and get them obeyed. Those who disobey the laws of the state, they are punished by the state. But the society has no such power through which it can enforce its rules. Society can only make rules for the guidance of man’s conduct. But if anyone disobeys the rules of society, he cannot be punished by the society. At the most, society can exert moral pressure but it is up to the people whether to obey rules of the society or not.

7. Society regulates both External and Internal activities of man while state regulates only the external activities of man. State is concerned with the external activities of man and not with the internal, whereas society is concerned with both. State regulates the external activities of man through its laws. State can take action against the activities of the individual but when a man thinks, state has nothing to do with that. But society is concerned not only with external activities but also with what man thinks.

8. The rules of State are different from the rules of Society:
Rules, and laws and the state are definite and clear and they are enacted by the legislature. But rules of the society are based on customs traditions and conventions and hence they are not definite and clear.

Conclusion:
Prom the above discussion it is clear that clear-cut distinction exists between the State and the Society. This distinction is not only theoretical but practical also. State’s sphere is political and it should not interfere in the social life of the individual. If it interferes then it becomes a totalitarian state. However, modern state is a welfare state and hence it cannot interfere into religion, culture, language and morality etc. of the people.

Though State and Society are different entities, yet they are closely related and interdependent. According to Barker “Society is held together by the state and if it were not held together, it could not exist.” Though state is an organ of the society, but society is maintained by state and if the state does not maintain the society, state will cease to exist.

In the words of Barker, “State and society have the same moral purpose. They lend and borrow from each other.” In the end we can say that though both are closely related yet they are not one. Laski has rightly said that, “the state may set the keynote of the social order but it is not identical with it.”

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 4.
Define ‘Nation’ and discuss the distinctions between ‘Nation’ and ‘State’.
Answer:
Various terms which are generally used in Political Science have been defined differently by different writers. The term ‘Nation’ has also been defined in various ways. Different writers have defined this term from different points of view. These view-points can be divided into three parts:
1. Ethnic view;
2. Cultural and Psychic view;
3. Political view.

These three view-points are explained as follows:
1. Ethnic view:
The word ‘Nation’ comes from the Latin word ‘natus’ which means ‘bom’. A nation, therefore, means a people having common origin of coming from a common stock. The definitions given from this point of view are as follows:

  • According to Burgess, “A nation is a population of an ethnic unity, inhabiting a territory of a geographic unity.”
  • According to Leacock, “Nation is a union of men having racial or ethnographic significance.”

Comments:
In the ancient times the oneness of community or race may have been the basis of a nation but in the modem age this view is not acceptable. No community or a race can call itself absolutely pure. Therefore, this view-point is not acceptable because it does not suit the present conditions.

2. Cultural and Psychic View:
Some people are of the opinion that a nation refers to the large number of people in a state who are bound together by certain emotional and cultural ties and who have a feeling of oneness. They feel that the feeling of oneness is the result of same language, religion, culture, history and traditions. The definitions given from this point of view are as ahead:

Society, State And Nation:
(i) According to Bluntschli, “Nation is a union of masses of men .bound together, specially by language and customs in a common civilization which give them a sense of unity and distinction from all foreigners.”

(ii) According to Barker, “A nation is a community of persons living in a definite territory and there by bound together by the bonds of mutual love.” Comments. This view-point is comparatively better than the one given before. One thing is quite clear now that psychological and spiritual unit is quite essential for the building up of a nation.

3. Political View:
The modern writers generally take the meaning of a nation as a political organisation. Most of the writers are of the opinion that the nation does not only mean that group of people which has a cultural and spiritual unity but it should also have a political unity.

Following definitions have been given from this point of view:

  • According to Hyes, “A nationality by acquiring unity and sovereign independence becomes a nation.”
  • According to Gilchrist, “Nation is the State plus something else the unit of the people organised in one State.”

Comments:
Most of the writers now-a-days consider nation a political institution but this view-point is not wholly correct. It is not proper to use the word ‘nation’ from political point of view. According to J. W. Garner, “ a nation is not necessarily a people organized as a State nor is a State essentially a nation.”

From the above discussion we can conclude that no single point of view can justifiably define or interpret nation. No point of view is complete in itself, there is some truth in every point of view. In a nutshell we can say that a nationality is a group of people bound together by certain ties like religion, culture, traditions, conventions and literature, etc. in such a manner that they have a sense of oneness. One nation, one state principle in the modern times is the most important one.

Difference Between State And Nation:
Ordinarily no difference is considered between nation and nationality. Nation comes very near to the State. Union of states is often called the union of nations, e.g., League of Nations, United Nations Organisation. In the modern age we find nation state which are formed on the basis of ‘one nation, one State’ principle.

The theory of one nation, one state itself points out towards the distinction between state and nation. According to this theory every nation should have the right to form a state and the states formed in this manner are called natural states. It implies that there can be state without the nation and there can be nation without the state.

Following points would make the distinction between the nation and the state clear:
1. State has four essential Elements:
State has four essential attributes- population, territory, government and sovereignty. Out of these, if there is even the lack of one element, the state cannot come into existence. We don’t need any of the four elements for the making of a nation. Nation is an association organised through cultural and spiritual feelings.

Nation can come into existence only when the people get conscious of unit. e.g., themselves into one group. That one group must have the feeling of oneness and that is possible only if the people have the same language, religion, culture, traditions and conventions etc. The elements of a nation may change and they go on changing, but the elements of state are permanent and they are always the same.

2. Idea of oneness is Essential for the Nation but not for the State:
Only that group of people can be called a nation which has sense of unity, but it is not essential in the case of a State. In case of State, it is essential that the people should be politically organised. Before Bangladesh’s coming into existence Pakistan was certainly a State but it was not a nation.

3. Definite Territory is essential for the State but not for the Nation:
State is a territorial organisation and it is only a definite territory. Nation is connected with the feeling of unity and not with any fixed territory. The members of an association or an organisation may be limited to small territory and they may also be spread all the world over.

4. There can be Many Nations in one State and Many States in one Nation:
Austria-Hungary was a single State before World War I, although there was no sense of spiritual unity among her people. In fact, she was a State having two distinct nations-Austria and Hungary within its fold. This proves that there can be many nations in one State. Pakistan and Bangladesh were two nations but they were one State. It is now that Pakistan and Bangladesh are two different States. On the other hand, one nation may be divided into two States, as North Korea and South Korea are one nation but they are two different States.

5. Sovereignty is essential for the State and not for the Nation:
State has the elements of sovereignty and it is essential for the existence of the State. The nation does not have any sovereignty. Nation attempts at attaining freedom and when it wins it, it gets sovereignty and with it also becomes a State and starts using its sovereignty. Now Bangladesh has become a State and the sovereignty which previously was in the hands of the rulers of Pakistan, now rests with the rulers of Bangladesh.

6. The State can Neither Create a Nation Nor End a Nation:
Due to the element of sovereignty, the State has control over all its citizens and other foreigners living in its territory and also controls the associations and other organisations but- the State can neither create that sentiment for unity in the hearts of the people which is essential for the making of a nation nor it can end a nation. We can very well see the things in our own case. The English tyrannized over the Indians for a long time but despite that they could not become a hindrance in our uniting as a nation.

Despite all these differences it would not be wrong to say that as in the modem times, on the basis of one nation, one State theory, national states are emerging, the nation and the state are coming close to each other.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
What do you understand by Society?
Answer:
Society is a group of persons living and working together in a spirit of peace and harmony for the satisfaction of their common wants and the promotion of their common good. It is a group of human beings living together and working together to achieve a common purpose for a common good, through their joint efforts.

  1. According to Dr. Jenks, “The term society means harmonious or at least peaceful relationship.”
  2. According to Maclver, “ Society includes every willed relationship of man to man.,
  3. According to Giddings, “ Society is a group of individuals co-operating for the achievement of any objective of common interest or utility.”
  4. According to Wright, “Society is not a group of people, it is the system or relationship that exists between individuals or groups.”

Question 2.
Write down any four characteristics of society.
Answer: .

  1. Group of Persons: Society is a group of persons living and working together in a spirit of peace and harmony for the satisfaction of their common wants and the promotion of their common good.
  2. Voluntary Membership: The membership of a state is compulsory while that of a society is voluntary.
  3. Mutual Co-operation: The individual is dependent on the society for various needs.
  4. Social Instinct: Society provides the individuals with all those opportunities or facilities with which he can develop his powers and faculties to the fullest extent.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 3.
Describe the meaning of the word state.
Answer:
The word “State’ is derived from the Latin word “Status’. The term ‘Status’ means social status of a man. In ancient times, no distinction was made between state and society. But gradually its meaning changed and during the time of Cicero it was used for the status of the whole society. In modern times this term was used for first of all by Machiavelli. State is a superior organisation to all other associations.

Different writers have given different definitions of the State. According to Bluntschli, “ State is politically organised people of a definite territory.” According to Garner, “ The State, as a concept of political science and public law, is a community of persons, more or less numerous. Permanently occupying a defined portion of territory, independent or nearly so of external control, and possessing an organised government to which the great body of inhabitants render habitual obedience.”

Question 4.
What are the essential elements of a State?
Answer:
There are four essential elements of a state. These elements are:
1. Population
2. Fixed territory
3. Government
4. Sovereignty.

1. Population:
Population is an essential element of the State. No fixed rules are there to fix the limit of population, but sufficient population is needed for the state.

2. Fixed Territory:
So long as the people do not occupy a fixed territory state cannot come into existence. Territory does not mean only a part of land but it means land, water and air. All the rivers, mountains, lakes and mineral resources which are with in the area of the state are included in the territory.

3. Government:
People living in a certain territory cannot by themselves constitute a state until and unless there is a political organisation of the people. Such a political organisation is the government. In a state the government can be of any type.

4. Sovereignty:
Sovereignty means the supreme power of the state. State possesses supreme rights and nobody can disobey the state. Due to sovereignty state is having full control over all the citizens and their associations.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 5.
Make a distinction between State and Society.
Answer:
Following are the differences between state and society:

  1. Society is prior to the state. With the advent of man on earth, society began. But state was established at that time when organisation within the society was established.
  2. Aims of the society is development of all aspects of individual life whereas the state is mainly concerned with the political aspects of individual life.
  3. Size of the state is small in comparison to the size of society.
  4. Definite territory is essesntial for the state but not for society.

Question 6.
Is Punjab a State?
Answer:
Punjab is not a State. It is one of the provinces of Indian State. The population of Punjab is infact not the population of Punjab because people residing in Punjab are the citizens of India. Centre has a right to change the boundary of Punjab. Punjab government is not sovereign neither in internal matters nor in external matters. Hence, Punjab is not a State.

Question 7.
Define Nation.
Answer:
The Word ‘Nation’ comes from the Latin word ‘Natus’ Which means ‘bom’. A nation, therefore, means a people having common origin of coming from a common stock. Many writers defined Nation according to their view point. Following are the definitions of the Nation.

  1. According to Burgess, “A nation is a population of an ethnic unity, inhabiting a territory of a geographic unity.”
  2. According to Leacock, “Nation is a union of men having racial or ethnographic significance.”
  3. According to Barker, “A nation is a community of perons living in a definite territory and thereby bound together the bonds of mutual love.”
  4. According to Gilchrist, “Nation is the state plus something else the unit of the people organised in one state.”

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 8.
Distinguish between State and Nation.
Answer:

  1. State has four essential elements, but elements of nation are not fixed.
  2. The element of a nation may change and they go on changing, but the elements of state are permanent and they are always the same.
  3. Idea of oneness is essential for the nation but not for the state.
  4. Definite territory is essential for the state but not for the nation.

Very Short Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
What do you understand by Society?
Answer:
Society is a group of persons living and working together in a spirit of peace and harmony for the satisfaction of their common wants and the promotion of their common good. It is a group of human beings living together and working together to achieve a common purpose for a common good, through their joint efforts.

Question 2.
Discuss any two characteristics of society.
Answer:
1. Group of Persons. Society is a group of persons living and working together in a spirit of peace and harmony for the satisfaction of their common wants and the promotion of their common good.
2. Voluntary Membership. The membership of a state is compulsory while that of a society is voluntary.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 3.
What do you understand by state?
Answer:
The word “State’ is derived from the Latin word “Status’. The term ‘Status’ means social status of a man. In ancient times, no distinction was made between state and society. In modern times this term was used for first of all by Machiavelli. State is a superior organisation to all other associations.

Question 4.
Define State.
Answer:
According to Garner, “ The State, as a concept of political science and public law, is a community of persons, more or less numerous. Permanently occupying a defined portion of territory, independent or nearly so of external control, and possessing an organised government to which the great body of inhabitants render habitual obedience.”

Question 5.
What are the essential elements of a State?
Answer:
There are four essential elements of a state. These elements are:-
1. Population,
2. Fixed territory,
3. Government, and
4. Sovereignty.

Question 6.
Make a distinction between State and Society.
Answer:
Following are the differences between state and society:
1. Society is prior to the state: With the advent of man on earth, society began. But state was established at that time when organisation within the society was established.

2. Aims of the society is development of all aspects of individual life whereas the state is mainly concerned with the political aspects of individual life.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 7.
Is Punjab a State?
Answer:
Punjab is not a State. It is one of the provinces of Indian State. Punjab government is not sovereign neither in internal matters nor in external matters. Hence, Punjab is not a State.

Question 8.
Discuss the meaning of Nation.
Answer:
The Word ‘Nation’ comes from the Latin word ‘Natus’ Which means “bom’. A nation, therefore, means a people having common origin of coming from a common stock. Many writers defined Nation according to their view point. Following are the definitions of the Nation.

Question 9.
Distinguish between State and Nation.
Answer:

  • State has four essential elements, but elements of nation are not fixed.
  • The element of a nation may change and they go on changing, but the elements of state are permanent and they are always the same.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

One Word to One Sentence Answer Type Questions

Question 1.
From which word the word state is derived?
Answer:
The word state is derived from the Latin word status.

Question 2.
Define state.
Answer:
According to Blunstachli, “State is politically organised people of a definite territorý.”

Question 3.
Write down any two elements of state.
Answer:

  1. Population
  2. Government.

Question 4.
Define society.
Answer:
According to G.D.H. Cole, “Society is the complex of association and institutions with in the communit.”

Question 5.
Write down any one feature of society.
Answer:
Society is a group of persor.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 6.
Distinguish lietween state and socIety.
Answer:
Aim of society is wider than that of state.

Question 7.
Define Nation.
Answer:
According to Barker, “A nation is a community of persons living in a definite territory and there by bound together by the bonds of mutual love.”

Question 8.
Write down any two factors which promote feelings of Nationalism.
Answer:

  1. Common motherland
  2. Common Language

Question 9.
Write down any one difference between nation and state.
Answer:
State had four essential elements but elements of nation are not fix.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Fill in the blanks

1. The term …………………….. means social status of man.
Answer:
Status

2. …………………….. and Gilchrist definition of state are considered the best.
Answer:
Gamer

3. In China there is a …………………….. of the Communist Party.
Answer:
Dictatorship

4. Sovereignty means the …………………….. power of the state.
Answer:
Supreme

5. U.N.O. is not considered a …………………….. .
Answer:
State.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

True or False statement

1. Jammu and Kashmir is not a state in the strict scientific sense.
Answer:
True.

2. State is prior to society.
Answer:
False

3. State possess sovereignty, society does not.
Answer:
True.

4. State has four essential elements, but nation has five essential elements.
Answer:
False

5. Ideas of oneness is essential for the Nation but not for the state.
Answer:
True.

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Choose The Correct Answer

Question 1.
Who said “Society is the web of social relationships and it is always changing.”
(A) Ogg and Zink
(B) Garner
(C) Maciver and Page
(D) Karl Marx.
Answer:
(C) Maciver and Page

Question 2.
The main difference between ‘State’ and ‘Society is:
(A) State is an association within society.
(B) Society is territorial, while the state may or may not be.
(C) Society is prior to state.
(D) State commands force, while ‘Society’ rnly uas’io.
Answer:
(D) State commands force, while ‘Society’ rnly uas’io.

Question 3.
The principle “that the population of a state should be large enough to make it self-sufficient and small enough to make good government
possible” was advanced by:
(A) Rousseau
(B) Plato
(C) Aristotle
(D) Laski.
Answer:
(C) Aristotle

PSEB 11th Class Political Science Solutions Chapter 9 Society, State and Nation

Question 4.
Who said, “A nationality by acquiring unity and sovereign independence becomes a nation.”?
(A) Gilchrist
(B) Hayes
(C) Burgess
(D) Barber.
Answer:
(B) Hayes

Question 5.
Which of the following is not a difference between State and Nation?
(A) State has four essential elements but no essential elements of Nation.
(B) Idea of oneness is essential for the Nation but not for the State.
(C) Sovereignty is essential for the State and not for the Nation.
(D) Sovereignty is essential for the Nation and not for the State.
Answer:
(D) Sovereignty is essential for the Nation and not for the State.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

Punjab State Board PSEB 10th Class English Book Solutions English Main Course Book Poem 2 Death the Leveller Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 10 English Main Course Book Poem 2 Death the Leveller

Question 1.
What is the theme or the central idea of the poem ?
Or
Question 2.
Write the summary of the poem in your own words.
Answer:
Death comes to all. It spares none. It treats the mighty and the weak equally. It reduces everyone to dust. Therefore, it is useless to boast of one’s power or wealth. Only our good actions remain after our death. Therefore, we should always be just in our actions.

मृत्यु सभी को प्राप्त होती है। यह किसी को क्षमा नहीं करती। यह शक्तिशाली और कमज़ोर सभी के साथ एक जैसा व्यवहार करती है। यह प्रत्येक व्यक्ति को धूल में मिला देती है। इसलिए अपनी शक्ति या दौलत की डींग मारना व्यर्थ होता है। केवल हमारे अच्छे काम हमारी मृत्यु के बाद जीवित रहते हैं। इसलिए हमें अपनी क्रियाओं में सदा न्यायसंगत होना चाहिए।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

Question 3.
What lesson do you get from this poem ?
Answer:
Death spares none. It reduces everyone to dust. It treats the mighty and the weak equally. Therefore, it is useless to boast of one’s power or wealth. Only our good actions remain after our death. So we should always be just in our actions.

मृत्यु किसी को क्षमा नहीं करती। यह प्रत्येक आदमी को धूल में मिला देती है। यह शक्तिशाली और कमज़ोर सभी के साथ एक जैसा व्यवहार करती है। इसलिए अपनी शक्ति या दौलत की डींग मारना व्यर्थ होता है। हमारी मृत्यु के बाद केवल हमारे अच्छे काम ही जीवित रहते हैं। इसलिए हमें अपने कामों में सदा न्यायसंगत होना चाहिए।

Question 4.
What does the expression ‘scythe and spade’ stand for ?
Answer:
The given expression stands for the poor peasants and labourers. These people become equal with the kings in death. Death makes no difference between them and the kings.

हंसिया और फावड़ा गरीब किसानों और मजदूरों के प्रतीक हैं। ये लोग मृत्यु में राजाओं के बराबर हो जाते हैं। मृत्यु उनमें और राजाओं में कोई भेद नहीं करती है।

Question 5.
Do the conquerors tame death or the dead ?
Answer:
Conquerors can tame only the dead. They have no power over death. Rather it is death that one day overpowers them and reduces them to dust.

विजेता केवल मृतकों को ही वश में कर सकते हैं। उनका मृत्यु के ऊपर कोई नियन्त्रण नहीं होता है। इसके विपरीत यह मृत्यु होती है जो एक दिन उन पर काबू कर लेती है और उन्हें मिट्टी में मिला देती है।

Question 6.
Explain the lines :
“Only the actions of the just
Smell sweet and blossom in their dust.”
Answer:
Death spares none. It comes to one and all. It reduces everyone to dust. Only one thing escapes death. It is one’s good and just actions. They live even after one’s death. They are never forgotten.

मृत्यु किसी को क्षमा नहीं करती है। यह सभी को प्राप्त होर्ती है। यह प्रत्येक व्यक्ति को मिट्टी में मिला देती है। केवल एक चीज़ मृत्यु से बच पाती है। यह व्यक्ति के अच्छे और न्यायसंगत काम होते हैं। वे व्यक्ति के मरने के बाद भी रहते हैं। वे कभी भुलाए नहीं जाते हैं।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

Question 7.
This poem highlights the uselessness of human power and might. What is it that cannot be snatched by death ?
Answer:
It is only our good and just actions that cannot be snatched by death. All other things – living and non-living – mix with dust in the end. Death spares none. Only our good actions live after our death.

यह केवल हमारे अच्छे और न्यायसंगत काम होते हैं जिन्हें मृत्यु छीन नहीं सकती। शेष सभी चीजेंसजीव और निर्जीव – अन्त में मिट्टी में मिल जाती हैं। मृत्यु किसी को क्षमा नहीं करती। केवल हमारे अच्छे काम हमारी मृत्यु के बाद जीवित रहते हैं।

Objective Type Questions

Question 1.
The ultimate fate of all human beings is ___
(i) old age
(ii) life
(iii) youth
(iv) death.
Answer:
(iv) death

Question 2.
What lives after death ?
(i) Name
(ii) Good deeds
(iii) Fame
(iv) Glory.
Answer:
(ii) Good deeds

Question 3.
The glories of blood and state are just shadows. (True/False)
Answer:
True.

Answer each of the following in one word / phrase / sentence :

Question 1.
Who wrote the poem, ‘Death the Leveller ?
Answer:
James Shirley.

Question 2.
Who have to stoop to fate ?
Answer:
All men.

Question 3.
What are not substantial things ?
Answer:
The glories of our high birth and position.

Question 4.
What does the expression ‘scythe and spade stand for?
Answer:
For the poor peasants and labourers.

Question 5.
How does Death treat the mighty and the weak ?
Answer:
It treats the mighty and the weak equally.

Complete the following :

1. Death is a great
2. Man should not ………………. of his great deeds.
3. The fame and honour won by man fade away after his
Answer:
1. leveller
2. boast
3. death.

Write True or False against each statement : 

1. Conquerer can tame only the dead.
2. Only good actions live after one’s death.
3. Mighty deeds can save one from death.
Answer.
1. True
2. True
3. False.

Choose the correct option for each of the following :

Question 1.
People who win battles with their swords fail to gain victory over ……………
(a) enemy
(b) life
(c) friend
(d) death.
Answer:
(d) death.

Question 2.
Death makes no …………… between the poor and the rich.
(a) different
(b) similar
(c) difference
(d) similarity.
Answer:
(c) difference

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

Reading Comprehension

(1) The glories of our blood and state
Are shadows, not substantial things;
There is no armour against Fate;
Death lays his icy hand on kings.

1. Name the poem and the poet.
2. What are not substantial things ?
3. Explain : ‘Death lays his icy hand on kings.’
Answer:
1. The name of the poem is Death the Leveller?. The name of the poet is James Shirley.
2. The glories of our high birth and position are mere shadows. They are not substantial things.
3. Death spares not even kings. It treats the mighty and the weak equally.

(2) Sceptre and Crown
Must tumble down,
And in the dust be equal made
With the poor crooked scythe and spade.

1. Write the name of the poem and the poet.
2. Who are equal before death ?
3. What does the expression “scythe and spade’ stand for ?
Answer:
1. The name of the poem is ‘Death the Leveller. The name of the poet is James Shirley.
2. Mighty kings and the poor peasants are equal before death.
3. The given expression stands for the poor peasants and labourers.

(3) Some men with swords may reap the field,
And plant fresh laurels where they kill
But their strong nerves at last must yield;
They tame but one another still.

1. Name the poem and the poet.
2. What do some men do with swords ?
3. What do they fail to do ?
Answers
1. The name of the poem is ‘Death the Leveller’and the name of the poet is James Shirley.
2. Some men win battles with their swords.
3. They fail to gain victory over death.

(4) Early or late
They stoop to fate,
And must give up their murmuring breath
When they, pale captives, creep to death.

1. Who stoop to fate ?
2. Which two words show that meh.don’t want to die ?
3. What is meant by ‘pale captives’?
Answers
1. All men have to stoop to fate.
2. Murmuring breath.
3. The words ‘pale captives’ create an image of the helpless ones who are at the point of death.

(5) The garlands wither on your brow;
Then boast no more your mighty deeds!
Upon Death’s purple altar now
See where the victor-victim bleeds.

1. What are the garlands that wither ?
2. Why should one not boast of one’s mighty deeds ?
3. What is meant by the victor-victim ?
Answer:
1. Garlands refer to the honours of victory in wars. All these honours prove useless in death.
2. Mighty deeds can’t save one from death. Therefore, it is useless to boast of one’s mighty deeds.
3. The victor of any war becomes a victim by death. The poet calls him victor-victim.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

(6) Your heads must come
To the cold tomb 
Only the actions of the just
Smell sweet and blossom in their dust.

1. What is that which must happen ?
2. What is “cold tomb’ a symbol of ?
3. What idea does the poet want to convey ?
Answer:
1. Everyone must meet death in the end.
2. The words ‘cold tomb’are a symbol of death.
3. Only good actions live after one’s death. Therefore, one should always be just in one’s actions.

Death the Leveller Poem Summary in English

Death the Leveller Introduction:
Death is a great leveller. It knows no difference between a king and a pauper. It treats the mighty and the weak, the rich and the poor equally. Everybody has to bow before Death’s power. Man should not boast of his great deeds. Only good actions are remembered after one’s death.

Death the Leveller Summary in English:

The glories of our high birth and position are mere shadows. They are not substantial things. There is no shield that can save us from what is destined for us. Death lays its cruel hands on kings even. Their sceptre and crown tumble down and are made equal in dust with the poor scythe and spade. In other words, kings and peasants are made equal in death.

Some men win battles by the power of sword. They may win laurels by killing others. But the strong nerves of even such men must at last bow before death. Men can defeat one another only; they can’t defeat death. All powerful men must bow before their fate and give up their murmuring breath early or late. When death overpowers them, they look like pale captives. Death ends all their pride.

The fame and honour won by you shall fade away’ after your death. So, you should not boast of your mighty achievements. You should know that all victors become victims at the purple altar of Death. Your heads, too, will have to lie under the cold tombs after your death. Only the actions of just men live after their death, and spread their fragrance all around.

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

Death the Leveller Poem Summary in Hindi

Death the Leveller Introduction:
मृत्यु एक महान् सन्तुलन स्थापित करने वाली चीज़ होती है। यह किसी राजा या रंक में कोई अन्तर नहीं समझती। यद्यपि कोई बलशाली हो या दुर्बल, धनी हो या निर्धन, यह सबके लिए एक समान होती है। सब को मृत्यु की शक्ति के आगे झुकना पड़ता है। मनुष्य को अपने बड़े-बड़े कामों की डींग नहीं मारनी चाहिए। मृत्यु के बाद केवल व्यक्ति के अच्छे काम ही याद रखे जाते हैं।

Death the Leveller Summary in Hindi:

कविता का विस्तृत सार हमारे जन्म या रुतबे की शान केवल परछाईयां होती हैं। ये महत्त्वपूर्ण चीजें नहीं हैं। ऐसा कोई कवच नहीं होता जो हमें उससे बचा सके जो हमारे भाग्य में लिखा होता है। मृत्यु अपने निर्दय हाथ राजाओं पर भी रख देती है। उनकी राजसत्ता और शाही मुकुट नीचे गिर जाता है और उन्हें धूल में हसिया और फावड़ा. उठाए निर्धनों के बराबर कर देता है। दूसरे शब्दों में, राजा और किसान मृत्यु के सामने बराबर होते हैं।

कुछ आदमी तलवार की शक्ति से युद्ध जीत सकते हैं। वे दूसरों को मार कर विजय के उपहार प्राप्त कर सकते हैं। परन्तु ऐसे आदमियों के मज़बूत मन भी अन्त में मृत्यु के सामने झुक जाते हैं। मनुष्य केवल एक-दूसरे को हरा सकते हैं; वे मृत्यु को नहीं हरा सकते। सभी शक्तिशाली मनुष्यों को अपने भाग्य के सामने झुकना पड़ता है और उन्हें जल्दी या देर से अपना श्वास त्यागना पड़ता है। जब मृत्यु उन पर काबू पा लेती है, तो वे पीले पड़े हुए बन्धकों की तरह लगते हैं। मृत्यु उनका सब घमंड समाप्त कर देती है।

तुम्हारे द्वारा प्राप्त मान और सम्मान तुम्हारी मृत्यु के बाद समाप्त हो जाएगा। इसलिए तुम्हें अपनी बलशाली उपलब्धियों पर घमंड नहीं करना चाहिए। तुम्हें यह जान लेना चाहिए कि सभी विजेता मृत्यु की बैंगनी वेदी पर पराजित हो जाते हैं। तुम्हारे सिर भी तुम्हारी मृत्यु के बाद तुम्हारी ठण्डी कब्रों के नीचे पड़े होंगे। केवल न्यायप्रिय लोगों के काम ही उनकी मृत्यु के बाद रहते हैं और सब तरफ़ अपनी सुगन्धि फैलाते हैं।

Death the Leveller Poem Translation in Hindi

1. (Lines 1-4)
The glories of our blood and state
Are shadows, not substantial things;
There is no armour against Fate;
Death lays his icy hand on kings.

Word-meanings : 1. blood-कुल, खानदान; 2. substantial-महत्त्वपूर्ण; 3. armour-कवच।

अनुवाद-हमारे जन्म या रुतबे की शान और यश केवल परछाइयों के समान होते हैं ; ये कोई महत्त्व की ठोस चीजें नहीं होती; भाग्य से बचा पाने वाला कोई कवच नहीं होता ; मृत्यु अपना बर्फ समान ठण्डा हाथ राजाओं पर भी रख देती है।

2. (Lines 5 – 8)
Sceptre and Crown
Must tumble down,
And in the dust be equal made
With the poor crooked scythe and spade.

Word-meanings : 1. sceptre-राजसत्ता; 2. crown-राजा; 3. crooked—गोल आकार वाली; 4. scythe-दराती; 5. spade—फावड़ा।

अनुवाद-राजसत्ता हो या राजा, सभी को नीचे गिरना पड़ता है, और वे धूल में मिलकर बराबर हो जाते हैंगोल आकार वाली दरांती और फावड़ा चलाने वाले गरीब किसानों के साथ। अर्थात् मृत्यु में राजा और रंक सब बराबर हो जाते हैं।

3. (Lines 9-12)
Some men with swords may reap the field,
And plant fresh laurels where they kill :
But their strong nerves at last must yield;
They tame but one another still.

Word-meanings : 1. laurels विजय के उपहार; 2. yield-हार मानना।

अनुवाद-कुछ लोग तलवारों के ज़ोर से युद्ध जीत सकते हैं और दूसरों को मार कर विजयोपहार प्राप्त कर सकते हैं। किन्तु उनके शक्तिशाली शरीरों को भी अन्त में हार माननी पड़ती है; वे केवल एक दूसरे को ही हरा सकते हैं न कि मृत्यु को।

4. (Lines 13–16)
Early or late
They stoop to fate,
And must give up their murmuring breath
When they, pale captives, creep to death.

Word-meanings : 1. stoop-झुकना; 2. murmuring-फुसफुसाते हुए; 3. captives—बन्धक; 4. creep-रंगना।

अनुवाद-जल्दी या देर से, अर्थात् कभी न कभी, उन्हें भाग्य के सामने झुकना ही पड़ता है। वे झुक जाते हैं .. भाग्य के सामने, और उन्हें अपनी फुसफुसाती हुई सांसें छोड़नी पड़ती है, जब वे पीले पड़े युद्ध-बन्दियों की भांति रेंगते हुए मृत्यु की तरफ़ बढ़ते हैं।

PSEB 10th Class English Main Course Book Solutions Poem 2 Death the Leveller

5. (Lines 17-20)
The garlands wither on your brow;
Then boast no more your mighty deeds
Upon Death’s purple altar now
See where the victor-victim bleeds.

Word-meanings : 1. wither-सूख जाना; 2. brow-माथा; 3. altar-वेदी; 4. victor- . victim-विजेता और पराजित।

अनुवाद-तुम्हारे माथे पर पहनी हुई विजय की मालाएं मुरझा जाएंगी। इसलिए अपने शक्तिशाली कामों की डींग मत हांकों ! उधर देखो, मृत्यु की बैंगनी बलि वेदी पर अब वह पराजित हुआ विजयी किस प्रकार रक्त में लथपथ हुआ पड़ा है।

6. (Lines 21-24)
Your heads must come
To the cold tomb
Only the actions of the just
Smell sweet and blossom in their dust.

Word-meanings : 1. tomb-कब्र; 2. just-न्यायपूर्ण।

अनुवाद-तुम्हारे सिरों को ठण्डी कब्रों में अवश्य ही आना होगा; केवल न्यायपूर्ण लोगों के काम ही उनके मरने के बाद उनकी धूल में फूलों के समान खिलते और महकते हैं। .

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 6 Return to Air

Punjab State Board PSEB 10th Class English Book Solutions English Literature Book Chapter 6 Return to Air Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 10 English Literature Book Chapter 6 Return to Air

Question 1.
Why was the boy called ‘Sausage’ ?
Answer:
The boy was quite fat and plump. That was why he was called Sausage.

लड़का काफ़ी मोटा और गोलमटोल था। इसलिए हर कोई उसे कुल्चा कहता था।

Question 2.
Why did the boy not like diving ?
Answer:
The boy had weak eyesight. He could not see properly without his glasses. He had to take off his glasses for diving. Therefore, he did not like diving.

लड़के की दृष्टि कमज़ोर थी। वह अपने चश्मे के बिना ठीक तरह से देख नहीं पाता था। गोताखोरी के लिए उसे अपना चश्मा उतारना पड़ता था। इसलिए वह गोताखोरी पसन्द नहीं करता था।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 6 Return to Air

Question 3.
What is duck-diving ? How is it taught ?
Answer:
Duck-diving means diving into water in the manner of a duck. A brick is thrown into water and the learner is asked to bring it out. In this way, duck-diving is taught.

बत्तखी-गोताखोरी का अर्थ होता है, पानी में बत्तख की तरह गोता लगाना। एक ईंट पानी में फेंक दी जाती है और प्रशिक्षु से इसे निकाल कर लाने के लिए कहा जाता है। इस प्रकार बत्तखी-गोताखोरी सिखाई जाती है।

Question 4.
What happened to Sausage when he tried duck-diving the first time ?
Answer:
Sausage. had to remove his glasses for diving. He could not see properly inside the water. Instead of the brick, he brought out an old tin-box from the bottom.

गोताखोरी के लिए सासेज को अपना चश्मा उतारना पड़ा। पानी के अन्दर वह ठीक तरह से देख न पाया। ईंट की बजाए वह एक पुराना टीन का डिब्बा तल से उठा लाया।

Question 5.
Why couldn’t Sausage see inside the water ?
Answer:
Sausage had weak eyesight and had to wear glasses. But for diving, he had to remove his glasses. That was why he couldn’t see properly inside the water.

सासेज की नज़र कमज़ोर थी और उसे चश्मा पहनना पड़ता था। किन्तु गोता लगाने के लिए उसे अपना चश्मा उतारना पड़ा था। इसी कारण से वह पानी के अन्दर ठीक ढंग से देख न पाया।

Question 6.
Why did the water change colours ? How did it change colours ?
Answer:
The water changed colours because the intensity of sunlight decreased gradually underwater. The water changed from thick green to brown lemonade and then to blackish-brown.

पानी ने रंग इसलिए बदले क्योंकि सूर्य की रोशनी की चमक पानी के नीचे धीरे-धीरे कम होती गई। पानी का रंग गहरे हरे रंग से बदल कर भूरे नींबू-सोडे जैसा और फिर भूरा-काला हो गया।

Question 7.
Was Sausage sure that he would not come out alive ? Give examples to support your answer.
Answer:
Sausage had been underwater for a long time. He was about to lose his breath. Although he started going up quickly, he thought he would not come out alive.

सासेज लम्बा समय पानी के अन्दर रहा था। उसकी सांस उखड़ने वाली थी। यद्यपि उसने तेज़ी से ऊपर आना शुरू कर दिया, उसने सोचा कि वह जीवित बाहर नहीं आ पाएगा।

Question 8.
What did Sausage dig out ? Did he know what he had caught hold of when he was inside the water ? Why ?
Answer:
He dug out an old tin-box. But he did not know what it was. He had weak eyesight and could not see properly without his glasses.

उसने एक पुराना टीन का बक्सा खोद कर निकाला। किन्तु उसे यह पता नहीं था कि यह क्या था। उसकी नज़र कमज़ोर थी और अपने चश्मे के बिना वह ठीक ढंग से देख नहीं सकता था।

Question 9.
Where did Sausage reach while swimming ?
Answer:
While swimming, he reached the other end of the pond.

तैरते हुए वह तालाब के दूसरे किनारे पर पहुंच गया।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 6 Return to Air

Question 10.
What did Sausage do with the tin-box ?
Answer:
He took the tin-box to his home. He placed it on the mantelpiece. He put his coin collection in it. He wanted to keep it as long as he lived.

वह टीन के बक्से को अपने घर ले गया। उसने इसे अंगीठी पर रख दिया। उसने इसमें अपने सिक्कों का संग्रह डाल दिया। वह इसे उतनी देर रखना चाहता था जितनी देर वह जीवित रहे।

Objective Type Questions

Question 1.
The boy was called …………
(i) flabby
(ii) filthy
(iii) Sausage
(iv) honest.
Answer:
(iii) Sausage

Question 2.
The instructor threw a tin in the pond. (True/False)
Answer:
False

Question 3.
Sausage put his stamp collection in the tin. (True/False)
Answer:
False

Question 4.
Sausage brought a ………….. from under the water.
(i) tin-box
(ii) fish
(iii) duck
(iv) pearl.
Answer:
(i) tin-box

Question 5.
Duck-diving means diving into water in the manner of a …………..
(i) fish
(ii) duck
(iii) crocodile
(iv) turtles.
Answer:
(ii) duck

Question 6.
Where did Sausage reach while diving ?
Answer:
The other end of the pond.

Answer each of the following in one word / phrase / sentence :

Question 1.
Who is the author of the story ?
Answer:
Philippa A Pearce.

Question 2.
What was the boy called ?
Answer:
‘Sausage’

Question 3.
What did Sausage not like ?
Answer:
Diving

Question 4.
What is thrown into water while teaching duck-diving ?
Answer:
A brick.

Question 5.
Why couldn’t Sausage see inside the water ?
Answer:
Because he had a weak eyesight.

Question 6.
How did water change colours ?
Answer:
From thick green to brown lemonade and then to blackish brown.

Question 7.
What was Sausage about to lose underwater ?
Answer:
His breath.

Question 8.
What did Sausage dig out ?
Answer:
He dug out an old tin box.

Complete the following :

1. The author of the story used to swim in a ……..
2. The boy was very fat and ………………
3. Duck-diving means diving like a ……………….
4. Sausage could not see ………. in water.
5. The water changed its ……….
Answer:
1. pond
2. plump
3. duck
4. properly
5. colours.

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 6 Return to Air

Write True or False against each statement :

1. The boy was nicknamed ‘Sausage’ because he was fat and plump.
2. Sausage liked diving very much.
3. A pitcher is thrown into water in duck-diving training.
4. For diving, the boy had to remove his sweater.
5. Sausage was about to lose his breath underwater.
Answer:
1. True
2. False
3. False
4. False
5. True.

Choose the correct option for each of the following:

Question 1.
The author of the story was expert in …
(a) shooting
(b) birdwatching
(c) swimming
(d) playing at cards.
Answer:
(c) swimming

Question 2.
What did Sausage have to take off before going into water ?
(a) His hat.
(b) His dress.
(c) His legs.
(d) His spectacles.
Answer:
(d) His spectacles.

Question 3.
Sausage dug out an old ……….
(a) radio set
(b) tin-box
(c) book
(d) bottle.
Answer:
(b) tin-box

Question 4.
Where was the tin-box placed ?
(a) On the shelf.
(b) In the almirah.
(c) On the mantelpiece.
(d) On the rooftop.
Answer:
(c) On the mantelpiece.

Return to Air Summary & Translation in English

Return to Air Introduction:
The author used to swim in a pond. He was quite expert in swimming. But he could not dive from the diving-board. He had to take off his specs to go into the water. Therefore, he did not want to learn diving. But he was told that one should learn to dive and go underwater. In this way, a person could rescue anyone from drowning. To teach the author diving, his swimming instructor threw a brick into the pond and asked him to bring it out. When the author removed his specs, he could see only blurred figures.

Even then, he jumped into the water. He could not see the brick underwater. He found a brick-like object at the bottom of the pond. He dug it out from the mud. He had swum underwater too far. Now he wanted to come on the surface as soon as possible. He became quite afraid. Various fears came into his mind. He thought he might not reach the surface in time. He kept on going upwards. Suddenly, he reached the surface. When he put on his specs, he found that instead of the brick, he had brought an old tin box from the bottom.

Return to Air Summary & Translation in Hindi

Return to Air Introduction:
लेखक एक तालाब में तैरा करता था। वह तैराकी में काफी निपुण था। परन्तु वह डाइविंग-बोर्ड से गोता नहीं लगा सकता था। पानी के अन्दर जाने के लिए उसे अपना चश्मा उतारना पड़ता था। इसलिए वह गोताखोरी नहीं सीखना चाहता था। परन्तु उसे बताया गया था कि व्यक्ति को गोता लगाना और पानी के अन्दर जाना आना चाहिए था। इस प्रकार व्यक्ति किसी को भी डूबने से बचा सकता था। लेखक को गोताखारी सिखाने के लिए उसके तैराकी प्रशिक्षक ने तालाब में एक ईंट फेंकी और उसे उसको बाहर निकाल कर लाने के लिए कहा।

जब लेखक ने अपना चश्मा उतारा तो वह धुंधली-सी आकृतियां ही देख पा रहा था। फिर भी उसने पानी में छलांग लगा दी। वह पानी के अंदर ईंट न देख पाया। उसे तालाब की तली पर एक ईंट जैसी चीज़ मिल गई। उसने उसे कीचड़ से खोद कर निकाल लिया। वह पानी के नीचे तैरता हुआ काफ़ी दूर चला गया था। वह अब जितनी जल्दी हो सके, सतह पर आना चाहता था। वह काफ़ी डर गया। विभिन्न प्रकार के भय उसके मन में आ गए। उसने सोचा कि वह समय से सतह पर नहीं पहुंच पाएगा। उसने ऊपर जाना जारी रखा। अचानक वह सतह पर पहुंच गया। जब उसने अपना चश्मा पहना तो उसने पाया कि वह तल से ईंट के स्थान पर टीन का एक पुराना बक्सा ले आया था। कठिन शब्दार्थ और सम्पूर्ण कहानी का हिन्दी अनुवाद.

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 6 Return to Air

Return to Air Summary & Translation in Hindi:

(Page 51-52)
The ponds are ………. never get it.”

Word-meanings : 1. pond-तालाब; 2. bald-गंजे; 3. squeeze-तंग जगह में घुसना; 4. wade –मुश्किल से चलना; 5. float-सतह पर तैरते रहना; 6. sausage-मांस से बनाया हुआ एक प्रकार का कबाब जैसा पदार्थ; 7. glasses—(नज़र का) चश्मा; 8. upend-उल्टा हो जाना।

अनुवाद- तालाब बहुत बड़े हैं, इसलिए एक सिरे पर लोग नहाते हैं और दूसरे सिरे पर मछली का शिकार करते हैं। गंजे सिरों वाले बूढ़े आदमी फोल्डिंग स्टूलों पर बैठे रहते हैं और डंडी और डोरी की सहायता से मछलियों का शिकार करते रहते हैं और छोटे-छोटे बच्चे जंगलों में अपने को सिकोड़ कर घुसते रहते हैं और फिर पानी में धीरे-धीरे चलते हुए अपने जाल से मछलियां पकड़ते हैं। किन्तु तालाब के हमारे वाले सिरे पर पानी ज्यादा

अन्य चीज़ के बारे में नहीं सोचा, सिवाए इसके कि उस ईंट को लिए हुए ऊपर उठू और (पानी से बाहर) हवा में पहुंच जाऊं। तली को मेरे उस तरह छुने ने कीचड़ को हिला दिया था इसलिए इसके एक बादल में से होते हुए मैं ऊपर की तरफ जाना शुरू हो गया। मुझे महसूस हुआ कि मैं खो जाऊंगा। शायद मैं पानी के अन्दर-अन्दर तैरते हुए बहुत दूर तक चला गया था – शायद मैं भटकते हुए उस जगह पर पहुंच जाऊंगा जहां लोग मछली का शिकार कर रहे थे और मेरे गाल के मांस में मछली वाला कांटा फंस जाएगा, या शायद मुझे ऊपरी सतह और बाहर की हवा फिर से नहीं मिल पाने वाली थी

(Page 53)
I was quite ……….. to be hundred.

Word-meanings : 1. exploded—एक तेज़ आवाज़ के साथ पानी से बाहर निकल आया था; 2. for a while – कुछ समय के लिए; 3. trickling down—पतली धाराओं की शक्ल में बह रहा था; 4. mantelpiece – अंगीठी के ऊपर सजावटी चीजें रखने की जगह।

अनुवाद- मैं काफ़ी डरा हुआ था यद्यपि मैं काफ़ी तेज़ी से ऊपर आ रहा था, और पानी अब भूरे-काले से हरा-भूरा और फिर चमकदार लैमनेड के रंग का होता जा रहा था; मैं पानी के अन्दर से सूरज को चमकते हुए भी देख पा रहा था, मैं सतह के नज़दीक आता जा रहा था। मैं काफ़ी धीरे-धीरे जा रहा था; मैं जान गया था कि मैं समय रहते फिर से हवा तक नहीं पहुंच पाऊंगा। अब मैं हवा में कभी नहीं पहुंच सकूँगा फिर अचानक ही मैं सतह पर था – मैं एक धमाके के साथ पानी से दुबारा हवा में आ पहुंचा था। कुछ समय के लिए मैं किसी भी चीज़ के बारे में नहीं सोच सका; और मैं कुछ भी नहीं कर सका, सिवाए इसके कि उस पुरानी सांस को छोड़ दूं, जिसे मैंने अन्दर रोक कर रखा हुआ था और कुछ ताज़ी और तेज़ सांसें लूं और ईंट को पकड़े रखू।

तालाब का पानी पतली धारों में मेरी नाक में से बह रहा था और मेरे मुंह में आ रहा था, जिससे मैं घृणा करता हूं किन्तु मेरे चारों तरफ़ और ऊपर की तरफ़ हवा थी, मेरे सांस लेने के लिए, जीवित रहने के लिए; और अब मैं शायद सौ साल का होने तक ज़िन्दा रहूं और मेरी अपनी हलवाई की दुकान हो, और मैं चांद पर चलं और कुत्तों को पालूं और किसी को डूबने से बचाऊं और इसके लिए मुझे पदक दिया जाए और टी०वी० पर मेरा इंटरव्यू लिया जाए। और फिर मैंने गौर किया कि वे किनारे पर खड़े चिल्ला रहे थे। वे ताली बजा रहे थे और चिल्ला रहे थे, “कबाब! कबाब!” प्रशिक्षक अपने हाथों को मुंह के गिर्द रखे हुए कह रहा था, “अरे, वह तुमने क्या पकड़ रखा है?”

तो उस समय मैं समझा कि मैं लगभग तालाब के दूसरे सिरे पर आ पहुंचा था। मैं पीछे मुड़ा और तैर कर किनारे पर पहुंच गया। उन्होंने मुझे मेरा चश्मा दिया ताकि मैं देख सकूँ कि मैं तली से क्या ले आया था। क्योंकि वह ईंट नहीं थी; उतनी ही बड़ी चीज़, पर वह एक टीन था – एक पुराना टीन – ऐसा बक्सा जिस पर कुछ भी पेंट बाकी नहीं रहा था और उस पर वह काला-भूरा कीचड़ जमा हुआ था जो तालाब की तली में से आया था। वह ईंट जितना ही भारी था क्योंकि इसमें कीचड़ भरा हुआ था – कीचड़ के सिवा कुछ नहीं। वह टीन तली में कई सालों से पड़ा रहा होगा।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 6 Return to Air

मैंने उस टीन को साफ़ कर लिया है और घर में अंगीठी के ऊपर वाली जगह रख दिया है और उसमें मैंने सिक्कों का अपना संग्रह डाल दिया है। मुझे बाद में फिर से एक अन्य ईंट के लिए वह बत्तख-गोता लगाना पड़ा था, और मैं ईंट को लाने में सफल हो गया था तथा मैं बिल्कुल भी डरा नहीं था। मैं उस टीन को रखे रहूंगा जब तक मैं जीवित रहूंगा, और मैं शायद सौ साल की उम्र तक जीवित रहूं।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

Punjab State Board PSEB 10th Class English Book Solutions English Literature Book Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need? Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 10 English Literature Book Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

Question 1.
What did the two women discuss ? Were they related to each other ?
Answer:
The two women discussed about town life and village life. Both of them were sisters. The elder one spoke in praise of town life. The younger one praised country life.

उन दोनों औरतों ने शहरी जीवन और ग्रामीण जीवन के बारे में विचार-विमर्श किया। वे दोनों बहनें थीं। बड़ी ने शहरी जीवन की प्रशंसा की। छोटी ने ग्रामीण जीवन की प्रशंसा की।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

Question 2.
What did one woman say in defence of rural life ? What was the counter argument ?
Answer:
She said that rural life could be rough, but it was free from anxiety. Villagers might never grow rich, but they always had enough to eat. But the other woman boasted of the town life.

उसने कहा कि ग्रामीण जीवन कठिनाई-पूर्ण हो सकता है, परन्तु यह चिन्ता मुक्त होता है। ग्रामीण. लोग चाहे कभी धनी न बन सकें, परन्तु उनके पास खाने के लिए सदा काफी रहता है। परन्तु दूसरी औरत ने शहरी जीवन की डींग मारी।

Question 3.
Pakhom listened to the women’s chatter. He started brooding and reached a conclusion. What was the conclusion ?
Answer:
Pakhom did not have enough land. He thought that if he had plenty of land, he would not fear the Devil himself. And he decided to buy some more land.

पाखोम् के पास पर्याप्त ज़मीन नहीं थी। उसने सोचा कि यदि उसके पास काफ़ी ज़मीन हो जाए तो वह स्वयम् शैतान से भी नहीं डरेगा। और उसने कुछ और ज़मीन खरीदने का मन बनाया।

Question 4.
What did the Devil decide when he heard Pakhom’s musings?
Answer:
The Devil decided to give Pakhom enough land. And by means of that land, he decided to get Pakhom into his power.

शैतान ने पाखोम् को काफी ज़मीन देने का फैसला किया। और इस भूमि के द्वारा उसने पाखोम् को अपने पंजे में करने का फैसला किया।

Question 5.
The estate-owner, on whose land Pakhom was a tenant, sold her land. Who bought the land ?
Answer:
One of Pakhom’s neighbours bought fifty acres of the land. Pakhom also arranged to buy forty acres of that land.

पाखोम् के एक पड़ोसी ने उस ज़मीन के पचास एकड़ खरीद लिए। पाखोम ने भी चालीस एकड़ खरीदने का प्रबन्ध कर लिया।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

Question 6.
How did Pakhom manage to put together the money for buying the land ?
Answer:
Pakhom sold his colt and one half of his bees. He hired out one of his sons as a labourer and took his wages in advance. He also borrowed some money from his brother-in-law.

पाखोम् ने अपना बछेड़ा (घोड़े का बच्चा) और आधी मधुमक्खियां बेच दी। उसने अपने पुत्र को कहीं मज़दूर लगवा दिया और उसका वेतन पेशगी ले लिया। उसने अपने बहनोई से भी कुछ पैसा उधार लिया।

Question 7.
Pakhom met a stranger one day. Who was this stranger ? What information did he give to Pakhom ?
Answer:
This stranger was a peasant. He told Pakhom that he had come from beyond the Volga. He said that the land there was very fertile. The rye sown on it grew as high as a horse.

यह अजनबी एक किसान था। उसने पाखोम् को बताया कि वह वोल्गा नदी के पार से आया था। उसने कहा कि वहां पर की जमीन बहुत उपजाऊ थी। इस पर उगाई गई राई एक घोड़े जितनी ऊंची हो जाती थी।

Question 8.
A trader told Pakhom something about the land of Bashkirs. What was it ?
Answer:
He told Pakhom that the Bashkirs had plenty of land. It was near a river and was very fertile. They sold it at a very low price – 13,000 acres for only 1,000 roubles.

उसने पाखोम् को बताया कि बशकीर लोगों के पास काफ़ी ज़मीन थी। यह एक नदी के नज़दीक थी और बहुत उपजाऊ थी। वे इसे बहुत कम कीमत पर बेच देते थे -.13,000 एकड़ केवल 1,000 रूबल में।

Question 9.
Who were the Bashkirs ? How did Pakhom make friends with them ?
Answer:
The Bashkirs were very simple people. They lived in tents. They had plenty of land. Pakhom made friends with them by giving them various gifts.

बशकीर लोग बहुत सीधे-सादे थे। वे तम्बुओं में रहते थे। उनके पास काफ़ी ज़मीन थी। पाखोम् ने उन्हें विभिन्न उपहार देकर उनसे मित्रता कर ली।

Question 10.
Bashkirs wanted to repay Pakhom for his gifts. What did Pakhom want from them ?
Answer:
Pakhom wanted from them their land. It was for this purpose only that he had come there.

पाखोम् उनसे उनकी ज़मीन चाहता था। वह केवल इसी उद्देश्य के लिए वहां पर आया था।

Question 11.
‘Our price is always the same : one thousand roubles a day, the chief said. What did he mean ?
Answer:
The Bashkirs did not sell their land by acres. They sold it by the day. It meant one could have for one thousand roubles as much land as one could walk round in one day.

बशकीर लोग अपनी ज़मीन एकड़ों के हिसाब से नहीं बेचते थे। वे इसे दिन के हिसाब से बेचते थे। इसका मतलब था कि व्यक्ति एक हज़ार रूबल में उतनी ज़मीन प्राप्त कर सकता था, जितनी ज़मीन का वह पैदल चल कर एक दिन में चक्कर काट सकता था।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

Question 12.
On what condition did the chief agree to sell land to Pakhom ?
Answer:
For one thousand roubles, Pakhom could have as much land as he could walk round in a day. But there was one condition. He had to come back to the starting point before sunset.

एक हज़ार रूबल देकर पाखोम् एक दिन में जितनी भी जगह का चलकर चक्कर काट सकता था, उसे प्राप्त कर सकता था। परन्तु वहां एक शर्त थी। उसे सूर्यास्त से पहले उसी जगह पर वापस आना था, जहां से वह चला था।

Question 13.
What is the moral of the story ?
Answer:
Man’s physical needs on this earth are not many. Yet he keeps hungering for them all his life. He never feels satisfied till he meets his end.

इस धरती पर मनुष्य की भौतिक आवश्यकताएं अधिक नहीं होती हैं। फिर भी वह सारा जीवन उनके लिए तड़पता रहता है। वह सन्तुष्ट नहीं होता जब तक उसकी मृत्यु नहीं हो जाती।

Objective Type Questions

Question 1.
The two women discussing about village and town life were
(i) friends
(ii) sisters
(iii) neighbours
(iv) enemies.
Answer:
(ii) sisters

Question 2.
The Bashkirs had plenty of ……………
(i) cattle
(ii) money
(iii) land
(iv) gold.
Answer:
(iii) land

Question 3.
How much land did Pakhom manage to buy from the estate owner ?
Answer:
Forty acres

Question 4.
Pakhom was a very …………… man.
(i) helpful
(ii) greedy
(iii) kind
(iv) selfish.
Answer:
(ii) greedy

Question 5.
Pakhom was dead in the end. (True/False)
Answer:
True

Question 6.
Pakhom borrowed some money from his brother-in-law. (True/False)
Answer:
True

Question 7.
Pakhom met a stranger who was a peasant. (True/False)
Answer:
True

Answer each of the following in one word / phrase / sentence :

Question 1.
Who is the writer of the story ?
Answer:
Leo Tolstoy.

Question 2.
What is the story about ?
Answer:
About the sin of greed.

Question 3.
Were the two women discussing about the town and village life ?
Answer:
Yes, they were.

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

Question 4.
How were the two women related to each other ?
Answer:
Both of them were sisters.

Question 5.
What did Pakhom decide ?
Answer:
To buy some more land.

Question 6.
Who purchased the estate-owner’s land ?
Answer:
Pakhom.

Question 7.
How did Pakhom arrange to buy the land ?
Answer:
By selling his colt and half of his bees.

Question 8.
Who told Pakhom something about the land of Bashkirs ?
Answer:
A trader.

Question 9.
Who were Bashkirs ?
Answer:
They were very simple people.

Question 10.
What sum was agreed upon to sell land to Pakhom ?
Answer:
One thousand roubles.

Complete the following:

1. The elder woman spoke ……….. .. town life.
2. Pakhom thought if he had plenty of land, he would not fear …………..
3. The Devil decided to give Pakhom ….
4. The stranger told that he had come from beyond …………..
5. One of Pakhom’s neighbours bought ……………… acres of land.
6. Pakhom was supposed to come back to the starting point before the sun had …
7. Pakhom met a stranger one day. The stranger was a ………..
Answer:
1. in favour of
2. the Devil
3. enough
4. the Volga
5. fifty
6. set
7. peasant.

Write True or False against each statement :

1. Pakhom did not have enough land.
Answer:
True

2. The younger woman praised town life.
Answer:
False

3. Pakhom purchased the estate-owner’s land.
Answer:
True

4. The Bashkirs lived in palaces.
Answer:
False

5. The Bashkirs did not sell their land by acres.
Answer:
True

6. Man never feels satisfied till his death.
Answer:
True

Choose the correct option for each of the following:

1. Man wants more and more of ……………..
(a) greed
(b) wealth
(c) education
(d) satisfaction.

2. What were the two women discussing ?
(a) The town life and village life.
(b) Domestic problems
(c) Military life.
(d) Kashmir issue.

3. Pakhom borrowed money from his …..
(a) maternal uncle
(b) neighbour
(c) colleague
(d) brother-in-law.

4. Pakhom wanted from the Bashkirs ……………
(a) their land
(b) their clothes
(c) their guns
(d) their horses.

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

How Much Land Does A Man Need? Summary & Translation in English

How Much Land Does A Man Need? Introduction:
This story by Leo Tolstoy is about the sin of greed. Man’s material needs on this earth are not many. Yet he troubles himself all his life. He wants more and more of wealth. He runs from one sin to the other till he meets his end. Tolstoy has illustrated this idea through the story of Pakhom. Pakhom had an insatiable greed for land.

The more land he had, the more greedy he grew. Once he said, “If I had plenty of land, I shouldn’t fear the devil himself.” On hearing this, the devil decided to try his strength against Pakhom. He thought that he would give Pakhom as much land as he desired, and thus get him into his power. In course of time, Pakhom came to have 125 acres of land, yet he was not satisfied.

He came to know about the land of Bashkir people. There he could get for 1000 roubles as much land as he could go round on his feet in one day. In his greed, he exerted himself too much. Yet he did not stop. He fell down dead just when he had completed the circuit. A grave was dug for him. Six feet from head to heels was all that Pakhom needed. Thus Tolstoy shows that greed brings man’s ruin.

How Much Land Does A Man Need? Summary & Translation in Hindi

How Much Land Does A Man Need? Introduction:
लियो टालस्टाए द्वारा लिखित यह कहानी लालच की बुराई के सम्बन्ध में है। इस धरती पर मनुष्य की भौतिक आवश्यकताएं अधिक नहीं होती हैं। फिर भी वह आयु-भर अपने आप को तड़पाता रहता है। वह अधिकाधिक दौलत प्राप्त करना चाहता है। वह एक पाप से दूसरे पाप की ओर भागा चला जाता है तथा अन्त में अपने अन्त को प्राप्त हो जाता है। टालस्टाए ने इस विचार को पाखोम् की कहानी द्वारा स्पष्ट किया है। पाखोम् के मन में ज़मीन प्राप्त करने के लिए न सन्तुष्ट हो सकने वाला लालच भरा हुआ था।

उसके पास जितनी अधिक ज़मीन होती जाती, वह उतना ही अधिक लालची होता जाता। एक बार उसने कहा, “यदि मेरे पास बहुत-सी ज़मीन हो जाए, तो मैं स्वयम् शैतान से भी नहीं डरूंगा।” यह सुनकर शैतान ने अपनी शक्ति उस पर आज़माने का निश्चय किया। उसने सोचा कि वह पाखोम् को जितनी भी ज़मीन वह चाहेगा, दे देगा और इस प्रकार उसे अपने शिकंजे में फंसा लेगा। कुछ समय के बाद पाखोम् के पास 125 एकड़ भूमि हो गई, परन्तु फिर भी वह सन्तुष्ट न हुआ। उसे बशकीर लोगों की जमीन के विषय में पता लगा।

वहां पर वह 1000 रूबल में उतनी ज़मीन प्राप्त कर सकता था जितनी ज़मीन का वह पैदल चल कर एक दिन में चक्कर काट सकता था। अपने लालच में उसने स्वयम् को बहुत थका लिया। परन्तु वह फिर भी नहीं रुका। ठीक उसी समय, जब उसने अपना चक्कर पूरा कर लिया था, वह मर कर गिर पड़ा। उसके लिए कब्र खोदी गई। सिर से पांव तक पाखोम् को केवल छः फुट की ज़रूरत थी। इस प्रकार टालस्टाए यह दिखाता है कि लालच मनुष्य का विनाश ले आता है।

How Much Land Does A Man Need? Summary & Translation in Hindi:

कहानी का विस्तृत सार

दो बहनें थीं। बड़ी का विवाह शहर में एक व्यापारी के साथ हुआ था। छोटी का विवाह गांव में एक किसान के साथ हुआ था। एक बार बड़ी बहन अपनी छोटी बहन से मिलने के लिए उसके गांव में आई। दोनों बहनें चाय पीते हुए बातें करने लगीं। बड़ी बहन ने शहरी जीवन के लाभों के बारे में डींगें मारनी शुरू कर दी। उसने कहा कि वे शहर में खाने और पहनने को बहुत अच्छी चीजें प्राप्त कर सकते थे। वहां मनोविनोद के बहुत- से साधन थे।

छोटी बहन को बहुत बुरा महसूस हुआ। उसने बदले में एक व्यापारी के जीवन में दोष निकालने शुरू कर दिए तथा उसकी अपेक्षा एक किसान के जीवन को बेहतर ठहराया। उसने यह स्वीकार किया कि शहरी लोग अधिक धन कमा सकते हैं, किन्तु उनका जीवन चिन्ताओं से भरा होता है। उसने कहा कि यद्यपि किसान का शरीर मोटा नहीं होता, किन्तु उसका जीवन लम्बा अवश्य होता है। उसने कहा, “हम कभी धनी तो नहीं बन सकते हैं, किन्तु हमारे पास खाने के लिए सदा पर्याप्त रहेगा।”

छोटी बहन का पति, जिसका नाम पाखोम् (Pakhom) था, पास बैठा दोनों बहनों की बातें सुन रहा था। अपनी पत्नी के मुंह से किसान के जीवन की जोरदार प्रशंसा सुन कर उसे बहुत गर्व महसूस हुआ। वह एक किसान के जीवन से पूरी तरह सन्तुष्ट था। यद्यपि किसान का जीवन व्यस्त तथा कठिन परिश्रम वाला होता है, किन्तु यह प्रत्येक प्रकार की बुराई से मुक्त होता है। पाखोम् ने अपने मन में सोचा, “हमारी एकमात्र कठिनाई यह है कि हमारे पास पर्याप्त भूमि नहीं है। यदि मेरे पास बहुत-सी ज़मीन होती, तो मैंने स्वयं शैतान से भी नहीं डरना था।” इस सारे समय के दौरान शैतान पाखोम् के पिछली ओर बैठा हुआ था। उसने वे सब बातें सुन ली जो वहां की जा रही थीं। उसे इस बात पर बहुत प्रसन्नता हुई कि किसान की बीवी ने अपने पति के मन में घमंड पैदा कर दिया था। शैतान ने पाखोम् पर अपनी शक्ति परखने का निश्चय कर लिया। उसने सोचा कि वह पाखोम् को बहुत-सी ज़मीन दे देगा और इस प्रकार उसे अपने पंजे में फंसा लेगा।

पाखोम् के गांव के समीप ही एक औरत रहती थी। उसके पास 300 एकड़ ज़मीन की जायदाद थी। वह एक बहुत भद्र और दयालु-हृदय स्त्री थी। एक शीत-ऋतु के दिनों में यह समाचार फैल गया कि वह औरत अपनी ज़मीन बेच रही थी। पाखोम् को बहुत ईर्ष्या महसूस हुई जब उसे पता चला कि उसका पड़ोसी पचास एकड़ जमीन खरीद रहा था। उसके पास केवल एक सौ रूबल (रूस में प्रचलित मुद्रा) थे। उसने अपनी एक घोड़ी और आधी मधुमक्खियां बेच दीं। उसने अपने लड़कों में से एक को कहीं नौकर लगवा दिया और उसका वेतन पेशगी ले लिया। शेष धन-राशि उसने अपने एक सम्बन्धी से उधार ले ली।

यह सब करने के बाद पाखोम् उस औरत के पास गया। उसने 40 एकड़ भूमि के एक टुकड़े के लिए उसके साथ सौदा कर लिया। उसने आधे पैसे नकद दे दिए और शेष राशि दो वर्ष के अन्दर चुकता करने का वचन दे दिया। इस प्रकार पाखोम् के पास अब अपनी निजी भूमि हो गई। उसने कहीं से बीज उधार ले लिए और ज़मीन में बो दिए। फसल बहुत अच्छी हुई और एक ही वर्ष के भीतर पाखोम् ने पूरा ऋण चुकता कर दिया।

एक दिन पाखोम् अपने घर में बैठा हुआ था कि वहां एक किसान आया। पाखोम्. ने किसान को अपने पास रात गुजारने की इजाजत दे दी। उसने किसान को भोजन भी खिलाया। किसान ने पाखोम् को बतलाया कि वह एक किसान था तथा वोल्गा नदी के दूसरी ओर से आया था। बहुत-से लोग वहां आ कर बस रहे थे। कोई भी व्यक्ति जिसके पास धन हो, वह दो शिलिंग प्रति एकड़ की दर से जितनी ज़मीन चाहे, खरीद सकता था। उसने बताया कि वहां ज़मीन इतनी उपजाऊ थी कि इस पर बोये हुए अनाज की फसल एक घोड़े जितनी ऊंची उग आती थी।

पाखोम के दिल में प्रबल इच्छा भर आई। उसने अपना मकान, अपने पश तथा अपनी सारी ज़मीन बेच डाली। वहां उसने नई भूमि खरीदी। यह भूमि अनाज की उपज के लिए बहुत अच्छी थी। पाखोम् ने वहां अपनी आवश्यकतानुसार इमारत खड़ी कर ली और पशु भी खरीद लिए। वह अब पहले की अपेक्षा दस गुणा धनी हो गया था।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

आरम्भ में तो पाखोम् अपने नए जीवन से बहुत प्रसन्न था। किन्तु जब वह इस का आदी हो गया तो वह सोचने लग गया कि यहां भी उसके पास पर्याप्त ज़मीन नहीं थी। वह गेहूं बोने के लिए अधिक, तथा और अधिक जगह प्राप्त करना चाहता था। हर वर्ष वह अन्य लोगों से ज़मीन किराए पर ले लेता था। मौसम ठीक होने के कारण उसे फसलें बहुत अच्छी प्राप्त हुईं। उसने पैसे बचाने शुरू कर दिए। किन्तु पाखोम् हर वर्ष अन्य लोगों की ज़मीन किराए पर लेने की मजबूरी से तंग आ गया। उसने गेहूं बोने के लिए अधिक भूमि खरीदने का निश्चय कर लिया। अचानक उसे एक ऐसा किसान मिल गया जो अपनी 1300 एकड़ जमीन बेचना चाहता था। पाखोम् ने सौदा कर लिया और 1500 रूबल पर मूल्य निश्चित हो गया। इस में से कुछ राशि नकद तथा शेष राशि बाद में दी जानी थी।
ठीक जिस समय सौदा पक्का किया जाना था, उस गांव में से एक व्यापारी गुजरा। वह अपने घोड़ों के वास्ते चारा प्राप्त करने के लिए पाखोम् के यहां आ कर रुका। उसने पाखोम् के साथ बैठ कर चाय पी, और उन्होंने

एक-दूसरे से बातें कीं। व्यापारी ने पाखोम् को बतलाया कि वह बशकीर लोगों के प्रदेश से आ रहा था जहां उसने केवल 1000 रूबल में 13000 एकड़ जमीन खरीदी थी। पाखोम् ने तुरन्त बशकीर लोगों के प्रदेश जाने का निश्चय कर लिया। उसने अपनी पत्नी को घर की देखभाल करने के लिए छोड़ा, और एक नौकर को साथ लेकर अपनी यात्रा पर निकल पडा।

पाखोम् तथा उसका नौकर सात दिन तक यात्रा करते रहे। अन्त में वे बशकीर लोगों के प्रदेश में पहुंच गए। ज्योंहि बशकीर लोगों ने पाखोम को देखा वे अपने तम्बुओं में से बाहर निकल आए। वे बहुत प्रसन्न लग रहे थे। उन्होंने अपने अतिथि का बड़े स्नेह से स्वागत किया। पाखोम् ने कुछ उपहार अपने छकड़े में से निकाले और बशकीर लोगों में बांट दिए। इसी दौरान बशकीर मुखिया भी वहां आ पहुंचा। पाखोम् ने कुछ सुन्दर उपहार मुखिया को भी दिए। फिर उसने उन लोगों को अपने वहां आने का उद्देश्य समझाया। मुखिया ने पाखोम् से कहा कि वह 1000 रूबल प्रति दिन के हिसाब से जितनी ज़मीन चाहे, खरीद सकता था। पाखोम् को मुखिया की 1000 रूबल प्रति दिन के हिसाब वाली बात समझ में न आई।

उसने मुखिया से पूछा, “जमीन मापने की यह कौन-सी इकाई होती है ? इसमें कितने एकड होते हैं ?” मुखिया ने उत्तर दिया कि उन्हें एकड़ों में मापना नहीं आता था। इसलिए वे दिनों के हिसाब से ज़मीन बेचते थे। मुखिया ने अपनी बात को इस प्रकार से कह कर स्पष्ट किया, “तुम अपने पैरों से चल कर एक दिन में जितनी भी जगह का चक्कर काट लोगे, वह तुम्हारी हो जाएगी, इसकी कीमत 1000 रूबल प्रति दिन होगी। किन्तु इसमें एक शर्त है। यदि तुम उसी दिन उस स्थान पर वापस पहुंच नहीं पाते जहां से तुम चले थे तो तुम्हारे पैसे ज़ब्त कर लिए जाएंगे। तुम जितना बड़ा चक्कर चाहो, काट सकते हो किन्तु सूर्य डूबने से पहले तुम्हें उस स्थान पर लौटना होगा जहां से तुम चले थे। वह सारी ज़मीन, जिस का तुम चक्कर काट लोगे, तुम्हारी हो जायेगी।” __ पाखोम् को यह सब सुन कर बहुत प्रसन्नता हुई। यह फैसला हो गया कि अगली प्रातः पाखोम् चलना शुरू करेगा। पाखोम् इतना उत्तेजित था कि उस रात को वह सो न सका। वह अपने मन में यही हिसाब-किताब लगाता रहा कि वह कितनी जगह का चक्कर काट पाएगा। वह रात-भर जागता रहा और प्रभात होने से थोड़े ही समय पहले उसकी आंख लग गई। सुबह उसने तुरन्त अपने नौकर को जगाया और बशकीर लोगों को बुलाने के लिए चल पड़ा।

वे सभी एक पहाड़ी पर पहुंच गए। चारों और असीमित भूमि फैली थी जो अति उपजाऊ थी। मुखिया ने पाखोम् से कहा, “जितनी दूरी तक तुम्हारी आंखें देख रही हैं, यह सब जगह हमारी है। तुम इसका जो भी भाग चाहो, ले सकते हो।” पाखोम् की आंखें चमकने लगीं। मुखिया ने टोपी उतारी, इसे ज़मीन पर रखा तथा कहने लगा, “यह निशान होगा। यहां से शुरू हो जाओ और लौट कर यहीं पहुंच जाओ। जितनी भी जगह का तुम चक्कर काट लोगे, तुम्हारी हो जाएगी।”

पाखोम ने अपने पैसे निकाल कर टोपी पर रख दिए। ज्योंहि सूर्य क्षितिज से ऊपर उठा, उसने चलना शुरू कर दिया। उसने अपने साथ कुछ रोटी और पानी की एक सुराही ले ली। ज़मीन के हर मोड़ पर निशान खोदने के लिए उसने अपने साथ एक फावड़ा भी ले लिया। आरम्भ में पाखोम् न तो बहुत धीरे और न ही बहुत तेज़ चला। एक हज़ार गज़ चलने के बाद उसने एक गड्ढा खोदा। इस निशान को और अधिक नज़र आ सकने योग्य बनाने के लिए उसने वहां घास वाली मिट्टी की एक ढेरी बना दी। पाखोम् ने अब अपनी गति और तेज कर दी।

गरमी बढ़ रही थी। उसने अपना कोट उतार कर कन्धे पर रख लिया। पाखोम् तीन मील तक चलता गया। फिर उसने मुड़ कर पीछे देखा। वह पहाड़ी मुश्किल से ही दिखाई दे रही थी। इस पर खड़े लोग काली चींटियों जैसे लग रहे थे। पाखोम् ने एक गड्ढा खोदा और वहां घास वाली मिट्टी की एक और ढेरी बना दी।

पाखोम् को अब थकावट महसूस होने लगी।
उसने सूर्य की ओर देखा तो पता चला कि अब दोपहर हो गई थी। वह कुछ आराम करने के लिए बैठ गया। बाद दोपहर पाखोम् ने शेष दूरी सीधी रेखा में दौड़ कर पूरी करने का निश्चय कर लिया।

पाखोम् ने जल्दी से एक गड्ढा खोदा और फिर सीधा पहाड़ी की ओर चल पड़ा।
वह अब मुश्किल से ही चल पा रहा था। गर्मी की वजह से उस का बुरा हाल हो गया था। उसके पैर कट गये थे और उनमें घाव हो गए थे। उसकी टांगें जवाब देने लगीं और उसे यह भय हो गया कि कहीं थकावट से उसकी मौत न हो जाए। फिर भी पाखोम् रुका नहीं। उसने अपना कोट, अपने बूट, अपनी सुराही और अपनी टोपी – सब फेंक दिए। उसने अपने पास केवल फावड़ा ही रखा क्योंकि इससे उसे चलने में सहारा मिलता रहा था। जब वह पहाड़ी के समीप पहुंचा तो सूर्य डूबने ही वाला था। पाखोम् ने एक लम्बी सांस भरी और पहाड़ी के ऊपर की ओर दौड़ पड़ा।

पाखोम् चोटी पर पहुंच गया और उसने वहां पड़ी हुई टोपी देखी। वह आगे की ओर गिर पड़ा और उसके हाथ टोपी तक पहुंच गये। मुखिया ने चिल्ला कर कहा, “वाह, कितना अच्छा आदमी है। उसने बहुत सारी जगह हासिल कर ली है।”

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 5 How Much Land Does A Man Need?

पाखोम् का नौकर दौड़ता हुआ आगे आया। उसने अपने स्वामी को ऊपर उठाने की कोशिश की, किन्तु पाखोम् तो मर चुका था। उसके मुंह से खून बह रहा था।

नौकर ने फावड़ा लिया और इतनी बड़ी कब्र खोदी जिसमें पाखोम् को दफनाया जा सके।
फिर उसने अपने स्वामी को इस में दफना दिया। पाखोम् को अपने सिर से लेकर एड़ियों तक के लिए केवल छ: फुट जगह की ही ज़रूरत थी।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Punjab State Board PSEB 10th Class English Book Solutions English Literature Book Chapter 4 The Dying Detective Textbook Exercise Questions and Answers.

PSEB Solutions for Class 10 English Literature Book Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Question 1.
Who was Mrs. Hudson ? Why did she go to Watson’s house ?
Or
Who was Mrs. Hudson ? Where did she go ? Why did she go there ?
Answer:
Mrs. Hudson was Sherlock Holmes’ landlady. She went to Watson’s house to tell him that his friend, Sherlock Holmes, was critically ill. She wanted Watson to come and save his friend’s life.

श्रीमती हडसन शरलॉक होम्ज़ की मकान-मालकिन थी। वह वाटसन के घर उसे यह बताने के लिए गई कि उसका मित्र, शरलॉक होम्ज़, सख्त बीमार था। वह चाहती थी कि वाटसन आए और अपने मित्र की जान बचाए।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Question 2.
Where did Holmes get the illness from ? When did he get it ?
Answer:
Holmes got the illness from some Chinese sailors. He got it when he was working on a case at a place near a river. But as we know, it was all a made-up story.

होम्ज़ को यह बीमारी कुछ चीनी नाविकों से लगी। उसे यह तब लगी जब वह एक नदी के समीप किसी जगह पर एक मामले पर काम कर रहा था। किन्तु जैसा कि हम जानते हैं, यह सब एक गढ़ी हुई कहानी थी।

Question 3.
What was Holmes’ condition when Watson saw him ?
Answer:
Holmes’ eyes had the brightness of fever. There was red flush on his cheeks. His thin hands were twitching all the time.

होम्ज़ की आंखों में बुखार वाली चमक थी। उसके गालों पर लाली थी। उसके पतले हाथ लगातार फड़क रहे थे।

Question 4.
Why did Holmes not let Watson examine him ?
Answer:
Holmes’ illness was a feigned one. Watson was a doctor by profession. He would have known the truth if he had examined Holmes. That was why, Holmes did not let Watson examine him.

होम्ज़ की बीमारी बनावटी थी। वाटसन व्यवसाय से डॉक्टर था। उसे सच्चाई का पता चल जाता यदि वह होम्ज़ की जांच कर लेता। इसी कारण से होम्ज़ ने वाटसन को खुद की जांच न करने दी।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Question 5.
Till when was Watson asked to stay in Holmes’ house ?
Answer:
He was asked to stay in there till 6 o’clock.

उसे वहां छ: बजे तक रुकने के लिए कहा गया।

Question 6.
Why did Holmes not let Watson touch his things ? What did Watson think about Holmes then ?
Answer:
Watson picked up an ivory box. Holmes knew it had a poisonous spring in it. Therefore, Holmes told him to put it down. He said that he hated to have his things touched. Watson thought that illness had affected Holmes’ mind.

वाटसन ने हाथीदांत की बनी एक डिबिया उठा ली। होम्ज़ जानता था कि इसमें एक ज़हरीला स्प्रिंग लगा था। इसलिए होम्ज़ ने उसे इसे नीचे रखने के लिए कहा। उसने कहा कि उसे पसन्द नहीं था कि उसकी चीजें छुई जाएं। वाटसन ने सोचा कि बीमारी ने होम्ज़ के दिमाग पर असर डाल दिया था।

Question 7.
What did Holmes ask Watson to do before leaving his room ?
Answer:
He asked Watson to light the gas-lamp, but only half on. Then he asked him to put on the table some letters, paper and the ivory box and the tongs.

उसने वाटसन से कहा कि वह गैस-लैंप को जला दे, किन्तु केवल आधी रोशनी पर। फिर उसने उसे मेज पर कुछ पत्र, कागज़, हाथीदांत वाली डिब्बी और चिमटी रखने को कहा।

Question 8.
Who was Culverton Smith ? Why did Holmes want him for the treatment of his disease ?
Answer:
Culverton Smith was a resident of Sumatra and a tea planter. Holmes wanted him for the treatment of his disease only to have him in his trap.

कल्वर्टन स्मिथ सुमात्रा का रहने वाला और चाय-बागानों का मालिक था। होम्ज़ उसे केवल अपने जाल में फंसाने के लिए उससे अपनी बीमारी का इलाज करवाना चाहता था।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Question 9.
What did Holmes ask Watson to say to Mr. Smith ?
Answer:
Holmes asked Watson to tell Mr. Smith how critically Holmes was ill and was at the point of death. Holmes wanted Watson to persuade Mr. Smith to come to Holmes’ house.

होम्ज़ ने वाटसन से कहा कि वह मिस्टर स्मिथ को बताए कि होम्ज़ कितना भयानक बीमार था और मरने के किनारे पर था। होम्ज चाहता था कि वाटसन मिस्टर स्मिथ को होम्ज़ के घर पर आने को सहमत करवा ले।

Question 10.
Did Smith welcome Watson calling on him ? How do you know ?
Answer:
No, Smith did not welcome Watson calling on him. He asked his butler to tell Watson that he was not at home.

नहीं, स्मिथ ने वाटसन के आने का स्वागत न किया। उसने अपने खानसामे से कहा कि वह वाटसन से कह दे कि वह (स्मिथ) घर पर नहीं था।

Question 11.
Why did Watson not come back with Smith ?
Answer:
Watson did not come with Smith because Holmes had asked him to do so. Watson pretended that he had some other appointment.

वाटसन स्मिथ के साथ इसलिए न आया क्योंकि ऐसा करने के लिए उसे होम्ज़ ने कहा था। वाटसन ने बहाना बना दिया कि उसे कोई दूसरा काम था।

Question 12.
What did Smith ask Watson when he finally met him ?
Answer:
Smith asked Watson if he was coming from Holmes’. He also asked him how Holmes was.

स्मिथ ने वाटसन से पूछा कि क्या वह होम्ज़ के यहां से आ रहा था। उसने उससे यह भी पूछा कि होम्ज़ का क्या हाल था।

Question 13.
Did Smith go near Holmes to examine him ? How do you know ?
Answer:
No, Smith did not go near Holmes to examine him. He well knew what had happened and only wanted Holmes to die.

नहीं, स्मिथ होम्ज़ के नज़दीक उसकी जांच करने के लिए नहीं गया। वह अच्छी तरह जानता था कि क्या हुआ था और केवल यही चाहता था कि होम्ज़ की मृत्यु हो जाए।

Question 14.
Who was Victor Smith ? What had happened to him and how ?
Answer:
Victor was Culverton Smith’s nephew. He had been murdered by Culverton Smith by the use of a poisonous spring.

विक्टर कल्वर्टन स्मिथ का भतीजा था। उसकी हत्या कल्वर्टन स्मिथ ने एक जहरीले स्प्रिंग का प्रयोग कर के कर दी थी।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Question 15.
“You did it. I’ll forget everything,” Holmes said to Smith. What did Smith do and how ? Did Holmes really mean what he said ? Give examples in support of your answer.
Answer:
Smith had conspired to kill Holmes by sending him a poisoned spring-box by post. Holmes did not really mean what he said. He was not ill at all. He was only laying a trap for Smith and trying to make him confess his crime.

स्मिथ ने डाक द्वारा एक जहरीले स्प्रिंग वाली डिब्बी होम्ज़ को भेज कर उसे मारने की योजना बनाई थी। होम्ज़ का वास्तव में वह अर्थ नहीं था जो उसने कहा। वह बिल्कुल भी बीमार नहीं था। वह स्मिथ के लिए केवल एक जाल बिछा रहा था और उससे उसका अपराध स्वीकार करवाने की कोशिश कर रहा था।

Question 16.
Why did Smith send an infected sharp spring in an ivory box ?
Answer:
Smith had killed his nephew. Holmes knew this fact. He was gathering evidence to prove it. That was why Smith sent him an infected spring to kill him.

स्मिथ ने अपने भतीजे को मार डाला था। होम्ज़ यह बात जानता था। वह इसे सिद्ध करने के लिए सबूत इकट्ठे कर रहा था। इसी कारण से स्मिथ ने उसे मारने के लिए एक संक्रमित स्प्रिंग भेज दिया।

Question 17.
Why did Holmes ask Smith to turn up the gas ?
Answer:
Holmes asked Smith to turn up the gas. It was, in fact, a signal for Inspector Morton to come in and arrest Smith.

होम्ज़ ने स्मिथ को गैस तेज़ करने को कहा। वास्तव में यह इंस्पैक्टर मार्टन के लिए एक इशारा था कि वह अन्दर आए और स्मिथ को गिरफ्तार कर ले।

Question 18.
Who arrested Smith ? What were the charges against him ?
Answer:
Inspector Morton arrested Smith. The charges against Smith were the murder of Victor and the attempted murder of Sherlock Holmes.

इंस्पैक्टर मार्टन ने स्मिथ को गिरफ्तार किया। उसके विरुद्ध आरोप थे – विक्टर की हत्या और शरलॉक होम्ज़ की हत्या का प्रयास।

Question 19.
Why did Holmes pretend to be ill ? What did he do and say to appear ill ?
Answer:
Holmes’ pretended illness was all a trap laid for Mr. Smith. In order to look ill, he did not eat for three days. He also applied a little make-up on his face. He also talked deliriously.

होम्ज़ की बीमारी का बहाना मिस्टर स्मिथ के लिए बिछाया गया मात्र एक जाल था। बीमार दिखने के लिए उसने तीन दिन तक कुछ न खाया। उसने अपने चेहरे पर थोड़ा-सा मेकअप भी लगाया। उसने
बड़बड़ाते हुए बातें भी की।

Question 20.
Should Holmes have spoken so rudely to Watson ? Why ?
Answer:
Holmes’ show of rudeness was a dramatic necessity. It was necessary to make Watson believe that Holmes was really critically ill and at the point of death.

होम्ज़ द्वारा उद्दण्डता का दिखावा करना एक नाटकीय आवश्यकता थी। यह वाटसन को विश्वास दिलाने के लिए ज़रूरी थी कि होम्ज़ सचमुच भयानक रूप से बीमार था और मरने के किनारे पर था।

Objective Type Questions

Question 1.
What was Watson by profession ?
Answer:
Watson was a doctor by profession

Question 2.
Holmes got the illness from some …
(i) Chinese sailors
(ii) Indian sailors
(iii) English sailors
(iv) Russian sailors.
Answer:
(i) Chinese sailors

Question 3.
Smith sent Holmes an infected sharp spring in …..
(i) a silver box
(ii) an ivory box
(iii) a golden box
(iv) a red box.
Answer:
(ii) an ivory box

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Question 4.
Victor smith killed Culverton Smith. (True/False)
Answer:
False

Question 5.
Holmes did not want Watson to touch his things. (True/False)
Answer:
True

Question 6.
Who was charged with the murder of his nephew ?
(i) Mrs Hudson
(ii) Morton
(iii) Smith
(iv) Watson.
Answer:
(iii) Smith

Answer each of the following in one word / phrase / sentence :

Question 1.
Who wrote the story, ‘The Dying Detective’ ?
Answer:
Arthur Conan Doyle.

Question 2.
Who was the detective in this story ?
Answer:
Sherlock Holmes.

Question 3.
Give the name of Sherlock Holme’s landlady ?
Answer:
Mrs Hudson.

Question 4.
Who was Dr Watson ?
Answer:
Sherlock Holmes’ friend.

Question 5.
Where did Sherlock get the illness from ?
Answer:
From some Chinese sailors.

Question 6.
Sherlock did not let the doctor examine him. Why ?
Answer:
Because his illness was a feigned one.

Question 7.
Who was asked to stay in Sherlock’s house till 6 o’clock ?
Answer:
Dr Watson.

Question 8.
Who had murdered Victor Smith ?
Answer:
Culverton Smith.

Question 9.
Who was Victor Smith ?
Answer:
Culverton’s nephew.

Question 10.
What were the charges against Culverton Smith ?
Answer:
The charges were the murder of Victor and the attempted murder of Sherlock.

Complete the following :

1. Culverton Smith was a resident of ………..
2. Victor was a nephew of ………..
3. Holmes asked Watson to tell Culverton …….
4. …… arrested Culverton Smith.
5. The ivory box contained an ……………..
6. Holmes was the only person who knew that Culverton ………….
Answer:
1. Sumatra
2. Culverton Smith
3. about his illness
4. Inspector Morton
5. infected spring
6. had killed Victor.

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Write True or False against each statement :

1. Holmes’ show of rudeness was a dramatic necessity.
2. Smith had not murdered his nephew
3. Culverton Smith did not go near Holmes to examine him.
4. Watson came back with Smith.
5. Holmes was a doctor by profession.
6. Holmes requested Dr Watson to examine him.
Answer:
1. True
2. False
3. True
4. False
5. False
6. False.

Choose the correct option for each of the following :

Question 1.
Dr Watson did not come back with Culverton Smith because ……..
(a) he had to go to his clinic
(b) Sherlock had asked him to do so
(c) he was not feeling well
(d) he went to meet Mrs. Hudson.
Answer:
(b) Sherlock had asked him to do so

Question 2.
Watson was asked to stay in Holmes’ house till …………
(a) 9 o’clock
(b) 8 o’clock
(c) 6 o’clock
(d) 4 o’clock.
Answer:
(c) 6 o’clock

Question 3.
Culverton Smith confessed before Holmes that
(a) he had killed Victor
(b) he had sent Holmes an ivory box by post
(c) the ivory box contained a killer spring
(d) all of these three.
Answer:
(d) all of these three.

Question 4.
Holmes wanted Watson to persuade Smith to …………
(a) come to Holmes’ house
(b) confess his crime
(c) go back to Sumatra
(d) kill Victor Smith.
Answer:
(a) come to Holmes’ house

Question 5.
Victor Smith had been murdered by Culverton Smith by the use of ……….
(a) a poisonous ring
(b) an ivory box
(c) a poisonous spring
(d) a sharp spring.
Answer:
(d) a sharp spring.

The Dying Detective Summary & Translation in English

The Dying Detective Introduction:
Sherlock Holmes was a detective. He had a friend named Dr Watson. One day, Holmes’ landlady came to Watson’s house and told him that Holmes was critically ill. Watson lost no time in coming to the flat where Holmes lived. He found Holmes lying in bed and feeling very restless. He tried to know about Holmes’ disease and its symptoms. But Holmes didn’t let Watson come near him. He said that it was a horribly contagious disease and Watson knew nothing about it. So he asked Watson to fetch one Mr. Culverton Smith who, he said, had all the knowledge of this disease. Then he told him to come back to him before Mr. Smith reached there. “This is very important,” he said. “Make any excuse so as not to come back with him. Don’t forget, Watson.”

Watson met Mr. Smith and told him about Holmes’ trouble. Mr. Smith at once agreed to go with Watson. But Watson remembered what Holmes had said. So he made an excuse that he had another appointment. When Watson came back, Holmes asked him to go to another room. While Watson was hiding there, he heard the footsteps upon the stairs.

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

Then he heard the opening and closing of the door. It was Mr. Smith who had come into the room. He felt quite delighted on seeing Holmes in a critical condition. Holmes was the only person who knew that Mr. Smith had killed his nephew Victor, but he had not been able to prove it. Now seeing Holmes dying, Smith confesses it to him that Victor had died the same way Holmes was dying now. He confesses that he had sent Holmes an ivory box by post. The box contained a killer spring. While talking thus, Mr. Smith picks up the box and puts it into his pocket.

At once, Holmes gives up his pretence of a dying man. He applauds his successful acting. This acts as a signal for Inspector Morton who at once comes in. He arrests Mr. Smith on the charges of Victor’s murder and Holmes’ attempted murder. Mr. Smith tries to deny his confession to Holmes, but there is Watson who has witnessed the entire drama.

The Dying Detective Summary & Translation in Hindi

The Dying Detective Introduction:
शरलॉक होम्ज एक जासूस था। उस का डॉक्टर वाटसन नाम का एक मित्र था। एक दिन होम्ज़ की मकान-मालकिन वाटसन के घर पर आई और उसे बतलाया कि होम्ज़ बहुत सख़्त बीमार था। वाटसन ने उस फ्लैट पर पहुंचने में कोई देरी न की जहां होम्ज़ रहता था। उसने देखा कि होम्ज़ बिस्तर पर पड़ा हुआ था और बहुत बेचैन था। उसने होम्ज़ की बीमारी और इसके लक्षणों के बारे में जानने की कोशिश की। किन्तु होम्ज़ ने उसे अपने नज़दीक न आने दिया। उसने कहा कि यह एक भयानक छूत का रोग था और वाटसन इसके बारे में कुछ नहीं जानता था। इसलिए उसने वाटसन को कलवर्टन स्मिथ नामक एक व्यक्ति को बुला लाने को कहा जो उसके अनुसार उस बीमारी के सम्बन्ध में सब कुछ जानता था। फिर उसने उससे कहा कि वह मिस्टर कलवर्टन स्मिथ के वहां पहुंचने से पहले ही वापस उसके पास आ जाए। “यह बहुत ज़रूरी है,” उसने कहा। “उसके सामने कोई भी बहाना बना देना। वाटसन, भूलना नहीं।”

वाटसन मिस्टर कलवर्टन स्मिथ से मिला और उसे होम्ज़ की बीमारी के बारे में सब कुछ बता दिया। मिस्टर स्मिथ वाटसन के साथ जाने को तुरन्त सहमत हो गया। किन्तु वाटसन को याद था कि होम्ज़ ने क्या कहा था। इसलिए उसने बहाना बना दिया कि उसे किसी दूसरी जगह जाना था। जब वाटसन वापस आया तो होम्ज़ ने उसे वहां से दूसरे कमरे में जाने को कहा। जब वाटसन वहां छिपा हुआ था तो उसे सीढ़ियों पर कदमों की आवाज़ सुनाई दी। फिर उसे दरवाज़े का खुलना और बन्द होना सुनाई दिया। यह कलवर्टन स्मिथ था जो कमरे में आया था। होम्ज़ को नाजुक हालत में देखकर उसे बहुत खुशी महसूस हुई। होम्ज़ एकमात्र व्यक्ति था जो जानता था कि स्मिथ ने अपने भतीजे विक्टर का वध किया था, किन्तु वह इसे साबित करने में असफल रहा था।

अब होम्ज़ को मरते हुए देखकर स्मिथ उसके सामने स्वीकार करता है कि विक्टर की मृत्यु उसी तरह से हुई थी जैसे अब होम्ज़ मर रहा था। वह स्वीकार करता है कि उसने होम्ज़ को डाक द्वारा एक डिबिया भेजी थी। इसमें एक जानलेवा स्प्रिंग लगा हुआ था। इस तरह बातें करते हुए स्मिथ मेज़ पर से वह डिबिया उठा लेता है और इसे अपनी जेब में डाल लेता है। वह कहता है कि सबूत का मात्र यही एक अंश था जो उसके विरुद्ध जा सकता था।

तुरन्त होम्ज़ एक मरते हुए आदमी वाला अपना नाटक समाप्त कर देता है। वह अपने सफल अभिनय पर तालियां बजाता है। इन्स्पेक्टर मार्टन के लिए यह एक इशारे का काम करता है, जो तुरन्त अन्दर आ जाता है और स्मिथ को विक्टर के वध और होम्ज़ के वध की कोशिश के दोष में गिरफ्तार कर लेता है। स्मिथ होम्ज़ के सामने अपना अपराध स्वीकार करने की बात से इन्कार करने की कोशिश करता है, किन्तु वहां वाटसन है जो पूरे नाटक की गवाही दे सकता है। कठिन शब्दार्थ तथा सम्पूर्ण कहानी का हिन्दी अनुवाद

The Dying Detective Summary & Translation in Hindi:

(Page 25-26)
Mrs. Hudson, the ……………… back !” he cried.

Word-meanings : 1. sinking-कमज़ोर होता जा रहा है; 2. last-चल सकना, जीवित रहना; 3. stand -सहन करना; 4. horrified-डर से भर गया; 5. details-विस्तृत विवरण; 6. foggy-कोहरे से भरी; 7. gloomy-अन्धेरा, उदासी-भरा; 8. gaunt-पतला, मरियल; 9. chill-ठण्डक, डर; 10. flushed—लाल पड़े हुए थे; 11. twitch-फड़कना; 12. listless-निर्जीव-सा, उत्साहहीन।

अनुवाद- श्रीमती हडसन, शरलॉक होम्ज़ की मकान-मालकिन, मेरे पास आई और बोली, “मिस्टर होम्ज़ मर रहा है, मिस्टर वॉटसन। तीन दिनों से वह कमज़ोर होता जा रहा है, और मुझे सन्देह है कि वह एक भी दिन और जिन्दा रह पाएगा। वह मुझे किसी डॉक्टर को भी लाने नहीं देता था। मैंने उससे कह दिया कि अब मैं ज़्यादा सहन नहीं कर सकती और एक डॉक्टर को ले ही आऊंगी। उसने उत्तर दिया, “ठीक है, फिर वह डॉक्टर वॉटसन ही होना चाहिए।’

मैं डर से भर उठा क्योंकि मैंने उससे पहले उसकी बीमारी के विषय में नहीं सुना था। मैं जल्दी से अपना हैट और कोट लेने भागा। जब हम कार में वापस जा रहे थे तो मैंने श्रीमती हडसन से पूरा ब्यौरा मांगा। “ज़्यादा कुछ नहीं जो आप को मैं बता सकू, श्रीमान। वह (पिछले कुछ समय से) नदी के पास स्थित रौदरहाइथ में एक मामले को सुलझाने के लिए काम करता रहा है और वहीं से यह बीमारी अपने साथ ले आया है। बुधवार को उसने बिस्तर पकड़ लिया और तभी से वह वहां से हिला तक नहीं है। तीन दिनों से कोई भोजन या पेय उसके होंठों से नहीं गुज़रा है।”

“आपने किसी डॉक्टर को क्यों नहीं बुलाया?” मैंने पूछा। “वह मुझे लाने नहीं देता था, श्रीमान। उसका कहना न मानने की हिम्मत मैं नहीं कर पाई।” होम्ज़ को देखना सचमुच बहुत कष्टदायक था। नवम्बर के एक कोहरे-भरे दिन की धुन्धली रोशनी में वह रोगी-कक्ष एक उदास कर देने वाला स्थान था किन्तु बिस्तर से एक मरियल-सा चेहरा मेरी तरफ़ टकटकी बांध कर देख रहा था जिसने मेरे मन को डरा कर रख दिया। उसकी आंखों में बुखार वाली चमक थी, उसके गाल लाल हो रहे थे और उसके हाथ लगातार फड़क रहे थे। वह निर्जीव-सा पड़ा हुआ था। “मेरे प्रिय मित्र!” उसके नज़दीक पहुंचते हुए मैं चीखा। “पीछे खड़े रहो! बिल्कुल पीछे ही खड़े रहो!” वह चिल्लाया।

(Page 26-27)
“But why …….. in his bed.

Word-meanings : 1. for your own sake-तुम्हारे ही भले के लिए; 2. deadly-जानलेवाः 3. contagious-छूत की, संक्रामक; 4. good heavens-हे ईश्वर; 5. advancing-आगे बढ़ते हुए; 6. give in-हार मान लेना; 7. aroused—जागृत हो उठी थी; 8. symptoms—लक्षण, निशानियां; 9. ignorant-अज्ञानी; 10. groan-कराहट; 11. admitted—स्वीकार कर लिया; 12. bolt—छलांग लगाकर जाना।

अनुवाद- “परन्तु क्यों? मैं तो तुम्हारी मदद करना चाहता हूं,” मैंने कहा। “वह मैं मानता हूं वाटसन, परन्तु यह सब मैं तुम्हारे ही भले के लिए कर रहा हूं।” “मेरे भले के लिए?” मैं चकित हो उठा।
“मैं जानता हूं कि मुझे क्या हुआ है। यह बीमारी सुमात्रा से आई है। यह बहुत जानलेवा है और यह छूत की बीमारी है, वॉटसन, सचमुच यह छूने मात्र से अन्य व्यक्ति को लग जाती है।”
“हे ईश्वर, होम्ज़! क्या तुम सोचते हो कि यह सुनकर मैं रुक जाऊंगा?” मैंने उसकी तरफ़ बढ़ते हुए कहा।

“यदि तुम वहीं खड़े रहोगे तभी मैं तुमसे बात करूंगा। अगर नहीं, तो तुम्हें कमरे से जाना होगा,” मेरे उस्ताद ने कहा। मैं हमेशा होम्ज की इच्छाओं के सामने सिर झुकाता रहा हूं। किन्तु उस समय मेरी डॉक्टरों वाली भावनाएं जाग उठीं। कम-से-कम रोगी-कक्ष में मैं उससे ऊंचा दर्जा रखता था। “होम्ज़,” मैं बोला, “तुम अपने आपे में नहीं हो, तुम चाहे इसे पसन्द करो या न करो। मैं तुम्हारे लक्षणों की जांच करूंगा और तुम्हारा इलाज करूंगा।”

“यदि मझे किसी डॉक्टर ने देखना ही है.” उसने कहा, “तो मेरे पास कम-से-कम कोई ऐसा डॉक्टर लाओ जिस पर मुझे विश्वास हो।”
“तो मुझ पर तुम्हारा कोई विश्वास नहीं है?”

“तुम्हारी दोस्ती पर निश्चित रूप से हैं। परन्तु सच्चाई सच्चाई होती है, वॉटसन। तुम एक सामान्य डॉक्टर मात्र हो, इस बीमारी के स्पेशलिस्ट नहीं हो।” “यदि ऐसा है तो मुझे सर जैस्पर मीक या पैनरोज़ फिशर को लाने दो या फिर लंन्दन के किसी अन्य सर्वोत्तम डॉक्टर को।” “तुम कितने अज्ञानी हो! वॉटसन,” एक कराह के साथ उसने कहा, “तुम टारपौनली बुखार या ब्लैक फारमोसा प्लेग के बारे में क्या जानते हो?”
“मैंने इन बीमारियों के बारे में कभी नहीं सुना,” मैंने स्वीकार किया।

“पूर्वी देशों में बीमारी की बहुत-सी समस्याएं हैं। मैंने हाल में किए गए अपने अनुसन्धानों से इतना ही सीखा है। और उसी दौरान इस बीमारी ने मुझे जकड़ लिया,” वह बोला।

“फिर मैं डॉक्टर आइनस्ट्री को ले आता हूं,” दरवाज़े की तरफ जाते हुए मैंने कहा। मुझे आज तक इतना घोर आश्चर्य नहीं हुआ था जब वह मरता हुआ आदमी छलांग लगाकर दरवाजे पर पहुंचा और उसे ताला लगा दिया और चाबी अपने हाथ में ले ली। अगले ही क्षण वह अपने बिस्तर में वापस पहुंच गया।

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

(Page 27-28)
“You won’t have ………. with him, watson.”

Word-meanings : 1. by force-बलपूर्वक, ज़बरदस्ती; 2. choice-पसन्द, चुनाव; 3. settle down to reading-पढ़ने में मन लगाना; 4. ‘mantelpiece-अंगीठी के ऊपर की तरफ़ सजावटी चीजें रखने की जगह; 5. ivory-हाथीदांत; 6. sliding-एक तरफ़ को हटाया जा सकने वाला; 7. dreadful डरावनी;

“उसका क्या हाल है?” उसने पूछा। “वह सख़्त बीमार है,” मैंने जवाब दिया। मैं मिस्टर कलवर्टन स्मिथ के घर पहुंच गया। खानसामा दरवाज़े पर दिखाई दिया। आधे-खुले दरवाजे से मैंने एक आवाज़ को खानसामा से कहते सुना, “मैं घर पर नहीं हूं, ऐसा कह दो।” मैं धक्का देकर खानसामा से आगे चला गया और कमरे में घुस गया। मैंने एक गंजे सिर वाले दुबले-पतले व्यक्ति को बैठे हुए देखा। “मुझे अफ़सोस है,” मैंने कहा, “किन्तु ऐसे मामले में देर नहीं की जा सकती। मिस्टर शरलॉक होम्ज ………..”

उसके नाम को सुनने मात्र से ही उस व्यक्ति पर एक भिन्न प्रभाव पड़ा। “क्या तुम होम्ज़ के पास से आ रहे हो? वह कैसा है?” उसने पूछा। “वह सख़्त बीमार हैं। इसी कारण से मैं यहां आया हूं। मिस्टर होम्ज़ आपके विषय में बहुत ऊंची धारणा रखते हैं और वह सोचते हैं कि लन्दन में आप एकमात्र व्यक्ति हैं जो उसकी मदद कर सकते हैं।”

वह छोटे कद का व्यक्ति चौंक उठा। “वह ऐसा क्यों सोचता है?” उसने पूछा। “पूर्वी देशों की बीमारियों के विषय में आप के ज्ञान के कारण,” मैंने उत्तर दिया। “उसे यह बीमारी कैसे लगी?” उससे पूछा। मैंने उसे सब कुछ बता दिया। वह मुस्कराया और आने के लिए सहमत हो गया। यह बहाना बनाते हुए कि मुझे कोई दूसरा ज़रूरी काम था, मैं उसके घर से निकल आया। मन-ही-मन में घबराते हुए मैं होम्ज़ के कमरे में पहुंचा। मैंने उसे बता दिया कि मिस्टर स्मिथ आ रहा था। “बहुत अच्छा किया! वॉटसन,” उसने कहा। “तुमने वह हर काम कर दिया है जो एक अच्छा दोस्त कर सकता था। अब तुम जल्दी से अगले कमरे में चले जाओ। और कुछ भी न बोलना और यहां मत आना।”

(Page 29-30)
I heard the ……….. “What’s all this per

Word-meanings : 1. footsteps-कदमों की आवाज़; 2. whispered-धीमी आवाज़ में बोला; 3. coincidence-संयोग; 4. indeed—सचमुच; 5. groaned—कराहा; 6. my mind is gone-मेरा दिमाग़ काम नहीं कर रहा; 7. pleaded—विनय की, बिनती की; 8. sharp-तीखा, नुकीला; 9. evidence -सबूत।

अनुवाद-मैंने कदमों की आवाज़ सुनी। मैंने एक आवाज़ को कहते सुना, “होम्ज! होम्ज़! क्या तुम मेरी आवाज़ सुन सकते हो?”
“क्या यह आप हैं, मिस्टर स्मिथ?” होम्ज़ ने बहुत धीमी आवाज़ में कहा। “आप अच्छी तरह जानते हैं कि मुझे क्या बीमारी है। लन्दन में आप ही एक अकेले व्यक्ति हैं जो मेरा इलाज कर सकते हैं।” . “क्या तुम्हें लक्षणों का पता है?” स्मिथ ने पूछा। “हां, बहुत अच्छी तरह, मिस्टर स्मिथ,” और उसने लक्षणों का वर्णन किया।

“ये लक्षण बिल्कुल वैसे ही हैं, होम्ज,” स्मिथ ने कहा। “बेचारा विक्टर (इस बीमारी से) चौथे दिन ही मर गया था – वह एक शक्तिशाली और स्वस्थ युवक था। सचमुच कैसा संयोग है!” “मैं जानता हूं कि तुमने ही वह सब किया था,” होम्ज़ बोला।
“ठीक है, लेकिन तुम इसे साबित नहीं कर सकते।” “कृपया मुझे पानी दो,” होम्ज़ कराहा।। “लो,” मैंने स्मिथ की आवाज़ सुनी।
“मुझे ठीक कर दो, कृपा करके। अब विक्टर सैवेज की मृत्यु के विषय में (बात करें)। तुम्हीं ने उसे मारा था। मैं इस विषय में सब कुछ भूल जाऊंगा, लेकिन मुझे रोगमुक्त कर दो। मैं वह सारा मामला भूल जाऊंगा।”

“तुम उसे भूल जाओ या याद रखो, जैसा चाहो, वैसा करो। अब मेरे लिए इस बात का कोई महत्त्व नहीं है कि मेरा भतीजा कैसे मरा। वॉटसन ने बताया था कि तुम्हें यह बीमारी चीनी नाविकों से लगी है। क्या इसका और भी कोई कारण हो सकता है?” “मैं सोच-विचार नहीं कर सकता। मेरा दिमाग बिल्कुल भी काम नहीं कर रहा, मेरी मदद करो,” होम्ज़ ने बिनती की।
“क्या कोई चीज़ डाक से आई थी? एक डिब्बा, संयोग से? बुधवार को?”

“हां. मैंने वह डिबिया खोली और उसके अन्दर एक तीखा स्प्रिंग था। शायद वह एक मज़ाक मात्र था। उस स्प्रिंग ने मेरा खन निकाल दिया,” होम्ज़ बोला।
“नहीं, वह मज़ाक नहीं था। ऐ बेवकूफ़ आदमी, तुम्हें वही बीमारी लग गई है। तुम्हें किसने कहा था कि मेरे रास्ते में आओ? तुम विक्टर की मौत के बारे में बहुत कुछ जान गए थे। तुम्हारा अन्त निकट आ पहुंचा है, होम्ज। अब मैं इस डिबिया को अपनी जेब में डालकर ले जाऊंगा। यही एक आखिरी सबूत बचा है !”

“गैस (की रोशनी) को तेज़ कर दो, स्मिथ,” होम्ज़ ने अपनी स्वाभाविक आवाज़ में कहा।
“हां, मैं रोशनी को तेज़ कर दूंगा ताकि मैं तुम्हें बेहतर ढंग से देख सकू।” उसके बाद खामोशी छा गई। फिर मैंने स्मिथ को कहते सुना, “यह सब क्या है?”

(Page 30)
“successful acting, said …………. Watson,” he said.

Word-meanings : 1. charge-आरोप; 2. scuffle-झगड़ा, हाथापाई; 3. rude-अशिष्ट; 4. undermine-कम कर के आंकना; 5. capability-योग्यता, सामर्थ्य; 6. fasting-भूखे रहना; 7. signal-इशारा।

अनुवाद- “एक सफल अभिनय,” होम्ज़ बोला, “तीन दिन से मैंने किसी चीज़ का स्वाद नहीं लिया है -न भोजन का, और न ही किसी पेय का।” बाहर से कदमों की आवाज़ आई। दरवाजा खुला और मैंने इंस्पैक्टर मार्टन की आवाज़ सुनी। “मैं तुम्हें हत्या के आरोप में गिरफ्तार करता हूं,” उसने कहा।

“और शरलॉक होम्ज की हत्या करने के प्रयास के आरोप में भी,” होम्ज़ ने हंसते हुए कहा। फिर इधर-उधर भागने और हाथापाई की आवाजें आई, फिर उसके बाद लोहे की खनक और अचानक पीडा की आवाज़ सुनाई दी। हथकड़ियों को बन्द करने का खटका हुआ। होम्ज़ ने मुझे अन्दर आने के लिए आवाज़ दी।

“मुझे अफ़सोस है, वॉटसन, मैंने तुम्हारे साथ बहुत अशिष्टता की। मैंने एक डॉक्टर के रूप में तुम्हारी योग्यता का मजाक उड़ाया था। वह स्मिथ को यहां लेकर आने की एक चाल मात्र थी। और मैं नहीं चाहता था कि तुम्हें पता लग जाए कि मैं वास्तव में बीमार नहीं था।”
“किन्तु आपकी वह शक्ल ……..?” मैंने पूछा।

“वह तीन दिन भूखे रहने और सही मेक-अप का ही कमाल था और मॉर्टन को अन्दर आने का इशारा देने के लिए गैस को तेज़ किया गया था।” “और वह सिक्कों वाली बातें?”

PSEB 10th Class English Literature Book Solutions Chapter 4 The Dying Detective

“ओह! वह सिर्फ इस बात को सिद्ध करने के लिए की गईं थीं कि मैं उन्मादी प्रलाप (बीमारी में अनाप-शनाप बोलना) कर रहा था,” वह हंसा। “अब मुझे कुछ खाने की ज़रूरत है, वॉटसन। मिस्टर स्मिथ ने अपने भतीजे की हत्या की थी और कैद से बचने के लिए मुझे भी उसी तरीके से मार देना चाहता था। अब मुझे खाने की ज़रूरत महसूस हो रही है, वॉटसन। और तुम्हारा बहुत धन्यवाद है, वॉटसन,” वह बोला।